EPRT
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
REIT - Diversified
Market Cap$6.79B
5Y Perf.+130.2%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
EPRT vs PINE
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
REIT - Retail
Market Cap$279M
5Y Perf.+57.5%
EPRT vs PINE — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | EPRT | PINE |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | REIT - Diversified | REIT - Retail |
| Market Cap | $6.79B | $279M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $593M | $65M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $257M | $-415K |
| Gross Margin | 84.7% | -4.1% |
| Operating Margin | 65.0% | 28.0% |
| Forward P/E | 24.1x | 58.8x |
| Total Debt | $2.52B | $394M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $60M | $5M |
EPRT vs PINE — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
EPRT
PINE
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Essential Propertie… (EPRT) | 100 | 230.2 | +130.2% |
| Alpine Income Prope… (PINE) | 100 | 157.5 | +57.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPRT vs PINE
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: EPRT leads in 6 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
EPRT
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
EPRT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.01, yield 3.7%
- Rev growth 25.0%, EPS growth 11.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 25.2%
- 189.7% 10Y total return vs PINE's 37.4%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PINE
Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.
The Real Estate Income Play
PINE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +35.5% vs EPRT's +2.3%
Best for: momentum
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EPRT | 25.0% FFO/revenue growth vs PINE's 15.9% |
| Value | EPRT | Lower P/E (24.1x vs 58.8x) |
| Quality / Margins | EPRT | 43.3% margin vs PINE's -0.6% |
| Stability / Safety | EPRT | Beta 0.01 vs PINE's 0.33, lower leverage |
| Dividends | EPRT | 3.7% yield, 7-year raise streak, vs PINE's 0.2% |
| Momentum (1Y) | PINE | +35.5% vs EPRT's +2.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | EPRT | 3.8% ROA vs PINE's -0.1%, ROIC 4.4% vs 2.2% |
EPRT vs PINE — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
EPRT vs PINE — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLEPRTLAGGINGPINE
PINEAlpine Income Propert…
2leads
EPRTEssential Properties …
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PINEMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
EPRT4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
PINE4/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
EPRT7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PINE4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
EPRT2/2
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EPRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $593M annually — 9.2x PINE's $65M. EPRT is the more profitable business, keeping 43.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PINE's -0.6%. On growth, PINE holds the edge at +29.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | EPRTEssential Propert… | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $593M | $65M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $548M | $45M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $257M | -$415,000 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$151M | -$46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +84.7% | -4.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +65.0% | +28.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +43.3% | -0.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -25.5% | -71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.1% | +29.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | +185.7% |
EPRT leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, PINE's 14.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EPRT's 17.9x.
| Metric | EPRTEssential Propert… | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $6.8B | $279M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $9.3B | $669M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 24.53x | -88.55x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 24.08x | 58.83x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 1.03x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 17.93x | 14.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.08x | 4.61x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.50x | 1.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 17.82x | — |
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPRT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
EPRT delivers a 6.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-0 for PINE. EPRT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.60x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PINE's 1.31x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EPRT scores 5/9 vs PINE's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | EPRTEssential Propert… | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.3% | -0.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | -0.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.4% | +2.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.8% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.60x | 1.31x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.5B | $390M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $60M | $5M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $394M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.17x | 0.82x |
EPRT leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in EPRT five years ago would be worth $14,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,113 for PINE. Over the past 12 months, PINE leads with a +35.5% total return vs EPRT's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PINE at 13.3% vs EPRT's 11.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EPRTEssential Propert… | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.5% | +17.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.3% | +35.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +38.0% | +45.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +44.2% | +41.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +189.7% | +37.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +11.3% | +13.3% |
PINE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — EPRT and PINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
EPRT is the less volatile stock with a 0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PINE's 0.33 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PINE currently trades 93.7% from its 52-week high vs EPRT's 90.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | EPRTEssential Propert… | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.01x | 0.33x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.73 | $20.80 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $28.95 | $13.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +90.4% | +93.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 42.5 | 53.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.0M | 175K |
Evenly matched — EPRT and PINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
EPRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EPRT as "Buy" and PINE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 16.2% upside for EPRT (target: $37) vs 6.5% for PINE (target: $21). For income investors, EPRT offers the higher dividend yield at 3.70% vs PINE's 0.18%.
| Metric | EPRTEssential Propert… | PINEAlpine Income Pro… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $36.50 | $20.75 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 22 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.7% | +0.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 7 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.16 | $0.04 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +3.2% |
EPRT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
EPRT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). PINE leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallEssential Properties Realty… (EPRT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
EPRT vs PINE: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPRT or PINE a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger pick with 25. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 15. 9% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) offers the better valuation at 24. 5x trailing P/E (24. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) a "Buy" — based on 22 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EPRT or PINE?
On forward P/E, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
is actually cheaper at 24. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EPRT or PINE?
Over the past 5 years, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) delivered a total return of +44. 2%, compared to +41. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EPRT returned +189. 7% versus PINE's +37. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EPRT or PINE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 01β versus Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. 's 0. 33β — meaning PINE is approximately 3677% more volatile than EPRT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 60% versus 131% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EPRT or PINE?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is pulling ahead at 25. 0% versus 15. 9% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. grew EPS 11. 3% year-over-year, compared to -257. 1% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EPRT leads at 25. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EPRT or PINE?
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the more profitable company, earning 45. 0% net margin versus -4. 4% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — meaning it keeps 45. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EPRT leads at 64. 5% versus 30. 5% for PINE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EPRT leads at 84. 0%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EPRT or PINE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) trades at 24. 1x forward P/E versus 58. 8x for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. — 34. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPRT: 16. 2% to $36. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — EPRT or PINE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc. (EPRT) offers the highest yield at 3. 7%, versus 0. 2% for Alpine Income Property Trust, Inc. (PINE).
09Is EPRT or PINE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Essential Properties Realty Trust, Inc.
(EPRT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 01), 3. 7% yield, +189. 7% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EPRT: +189. 7%, PINE: +37. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EPRT and PINE?
Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
EPRT pays a dividend while PINE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(EPRT: 24.1% · PINE: 29.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.