Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EPSN vs REPX vs CIVI vs BATL vs MTDR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
EPSN vs REPX vs CIVI vs BATL vs MTDR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production |
| Market Cap | $130M | $743M | $2.34B | $47M | $6.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $46M | $403M | $4.71B | $165M | $3.36B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $6M | $62M | $638M | $12M | $483M |
| Gross Margin | 47.6% | 63.5% | 43.9% | 72.8% | 102.0% |
| Operating Margin | 21.9% | 32.1% | 31.1% | -4.0% | 26.3% |
| Forward P/E | 17.3x | 6.4x | 6.8x | 12.4x | 7.7x |
| Total Debt | $477K | $255M | $4.49B | $23M | $3.55B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $7M | $18M | $76M | $28M | $79M |
EPSN vs REPX vs CIVI vs BATL vs MTDR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN) | 100 | 202.1 | +102.1% |
| Riley Exploration P… (REPX) | 100 | 530.7 | +430.7% |
| Civitas Resources, … (CIVI) | 100 | 160.3 | +60.3% |
| Battalion Oil Corpo… (BATL) | 100 | 49.4 | -50.6% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | 100 | 708.8 | +608.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EPSN vs REPX vs CIVI vs BATL vs MTDR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EPSN is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 0.15, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 2.02x
- Beta 0.15, yield 4.3%, current ratio 2.02x
REPX carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.47, yield 4.6%
- Lower P/E (6.4x vs 7.7x)
- 15.3% margin vs BATL's 7.2%
- 4.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BATL's 100.0%
CIVI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 49.8%, EPS growth -6.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 77.5%
- 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9%
BATL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +128.8% vs EPSN's -4.7%
MTDR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 201.8% 10Y total return vs EPSN's -66.9%
- Beta 0.06 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.8% revenue growth vs BATL's -14.9% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (6.4x vs 7.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.3% margin vs BATL's 7.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.06 vs CIVI's 1.10, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.6% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs BATL's 100.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +128.8% vs EPSN's -4.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.4% ROA vs BATL's 2.4%, ROIC 12.9% vs -3.4% |
EPSN vs REPX vs CIVI vs BATL vs MTDR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
EPSN vs REPX vs CIVI vs BATL vs MTDR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
BATL leads in 1 of 6 categories
EPSN leads 1 • MTDR leads 1 • REPX leads 0 • CIVI leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EPSN and REPX each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CIVI is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 102.9x EPSN's $46M. REPX is the more profitable business, keeping 15.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BATL's 7.2%. On growth, EPSN holds the edge at +23.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $46M | $403M | $4.7B | $165M | $3.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $22M | $229M | $3.4B | $74M | $2.1B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $6M | $62M | $638M | $12M | $483M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $10M | $68M | $934M | $39M | $518M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +47.6% | +63.5% | +43.9% | +72.8% | +102.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +32.1% | +31.1% | -4.0% | +26.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +12.9% | +15.3% | +13.6% | +7.2% | +14.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +22.7% | +16.9% | +19.8% | +23.7% | +15.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +23.2% | +11.2% | -8.1% | -37.0% | -33.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.0% | -3.5% | -33.9% | +59.0% | -115.1% |
Valuation Metrics
BATL leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 3.2x trailing earnings, CIVI trades at a 95% valuation discount to EPSN's 66.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, CIVI's 1.9x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than EPSN's 9.1x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $130M | $743M | $2.3B | $47M | $6.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $124M | $980M | $6.8B | $42M | $10.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 66.89x | 4.51x | 3.24x | -1.28x | 9.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 17.29x | 6.41x | 6.75x | 12.43x | 7.72x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.15x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.09x | 4.18x | 1.89x | — | 4.34x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.11x | 1.89x | 0.45x | 0.29x | 1.89x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.33x | 1.14x | 0.41x | — | 1.15x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 8.61x | 2.61x | 1.20x | 28.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EPSN leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BATL delivers a 14.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $6 for EPSN. EPSN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CIVI's 0.68x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BATL scores 8/9 vs MTDR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +5.9% | +10.7% | +9.5% | +14.5% | +8.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +4.7% | +5.4% | +4.2% | +2.4% | +4.1% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +2.9% | +12.9% | +10.8% | -3.4% | +10.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.0% | +15.0% | +12.1% | -1.8% | +11.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 5 | 8 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.40x | 0.68x | — | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$6M | $237M | $4.4B | -$5M | $3.5B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $7M | $18M | $76M | $28M | $79M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $476,911 | $255M | $4.5B | $23M | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 157.74x | 5.60x | 2.80x | 0.57x | 7.88x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MTDR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MTDR five years ago would be worth $20,548 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $2,252 for BATL. Over the past 12 months, BATL leads with a +128.8% total return vs EPSN's -4.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MTDR at 9.1% vs BATL's -23.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +29.2% | +31.7% | -1.5% | +140.3% | +29.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -4.7% | +43.9% | +6.8% | +128.8% | +42.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +27.8% | -8.8% | -41.7% | -54.3% | +29.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +76.2% | +20.4% | +31.9% | -77.5% | +105.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.9% | +183.6% | -86.2% | -72.1% | +201.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +8.5% | -3.0% | -16.5% | -23.0% | +9.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — REPX and BATL each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BATL is the less volatile stock with a -1.71 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than CIVI's 1.10 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. REPX currently trades 83.5% from its 52-week high vs BATL's 9.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.15x | 0.47x | 1.10x | -1.71x | 0.06x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $8.50 | $40.98 | $37.45 | $29.70 | $66.84 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $4.20 | $24.08 | $25.38 | $1.00 | $37.14 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.2% | +83.5% | +73.1% | +9.6% | +83.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 44.5 | 40.3 | 54.8 | 37.6 | 43.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 246K | 457K | 22.4M | 16.6M | 1.8M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — REPX and BATL and MTDR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: REPX as "Buy", CIVI as "Hold", BATL as "Buy", MTDR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 42.9% upside for EPSN (target: $8) vs 8.1% for REPX (target: $37). For income investors, BATL offers the higher dividend yield at 100.00% vs MTDR's 2.36%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $8.40 | $37.00 | $31.00 | — | $68.29 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 3 | 16 | 2 | 42 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +4.3% | +4.6% | +18.2% | +100.0% | +2.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.25 | $1.57 | $4.98 | $2.96 | $1.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +1.4% | +0.4% | +18.3% | 0.0% | +0.8% |
BATL leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). EPSN leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 3 tied.
EPSN vs REPX vs CIVI vs BATL vs MTDR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EPSN or REPX or CIVI or BATL or MTDR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the stronger pick with 49. 8% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Civitas Resources, Inc. (CIVI) offers the better valuation at 3. 2x trailing P/E (6. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. (REPX) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EPSN or REPX or CIVI or BATL or MTDR?
On trailing P/E, Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is the cheapest at 3. 2x versus Epsilon Energy Ltd. at 66. 9x. On forward P/E, Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. is actually cheaper at 6. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EPSN or REPX or CIVI or BATL or MTDR?
Over the past 5 years, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) delivered a total return of +105.
5%, compared to -77. 5% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MTDR returned +201. 8% versus CIVI's -86. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EPSN or REPX or CIVI or BATL or MTDR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the lower-risk stock at -1.
71β versus Civitas Resources, Inc. 's 1. 10β — meaning CIVI is approximately -164% more volatile than BATL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Epsilon Energy Ltd. (EPSN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 68% for Civitas Resources, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EPSN or REPX or CIVI or BATL or MTDR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Civitas Resources, Inc.
(CIVI) is pulling ahead at 49. 8% versus -14. 9% for Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Riley Exploration Permian, Inc. grew EPS 78. 2% year-over-year, compared to -71. 6% for Epsilon Energy Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CIVI leads at 77. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EPSN or REPX or CIVI or BATL or MTDR?
Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.
(REPX) is the more profitable company, earning 41. 0% net margin versus 6. 1% for Epsilon Energy Ltd. — meaning it keeps 41. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: REPX leads at 36. 0% versus -4. 0% for BATL. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BATL leads at 72. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EPSN or REPX or CIVI or BATL or MTDR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Riley Exploration Permian, Inc.
(REPX) trades at 6. 4x forward P/E versus 17. 3x for Epsilon Energy Ltd. — 10. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EPSN: 42. 9% to $8. 40.
08Which pays a better dividend — EPSN or REPX or CIVI or BATL or MTDR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) offers the highest yield at 100. 0%, versus 2. 4% for Matador Resources Company (MTDR).
09Is EPSN or REPX or CIVI or BATL or MTDR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Battalion Oil Corporation (BATL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -1.
71), 100. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BATL: -72. 1%, CIVI: -86. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EPSN and REPX and CIVI and BATL and MTDR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: EPSN is a small-cap income-oriented stock; REPX is a small-cap deep-value stock; CIVI is a small-cap high-growth stock; BATL is a small-cap income-oriented stock; MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.