Comprehensive Stock Comparison
Compare Equinor ASA (EQNR) vs TotalEnergies SE (TTE) Stock
Analyze side-by-side fundamentals, valuation, growth, and profitability to decide which stock is the better buy.
Selected Stocks
Add up to 10 tickers. Use presets or search to get started.
Quick Verdict
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | EQNR | 3.6% revenue growth vs TTE's -3.0% |
| Value | EQNR | Lower P/E (11.4x vs 12.2x) |
| Quality / Margins | TTE | 7.2% net margin vs EQNR's 4.7% |
| Stability / Safety | EQNR | Beta 0.49 vs TTE's 0.49 |
| Dividends | EQNR | 6.2% yield, vs TTE's 4.8% |
| Momentum (1Y) | TTE | +43.1% vs EQNR's +33.0% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | TTE | 4.5% ROA vs EQNR's 3.8%, ROIC 10.9% vs 30.7% |
Who Each Stock Is For
Income & stability
Growth exposure
Long-term compounding (10Y)
Sleep-well-at-night portfolio
Defensive / Recession hedge
Business Model
What each company does and how it makes money
Equinor is a Norwegian integrated energy company that explores for, produces, refines, and markets oil and natural gas while expanding into renewable energy. It generates most revenue from oil and gas production—primarily from Norwegian continental shelf operations—with additional income from refining, marketing, and emerging renewables like offshore wind. The company's key advantage is its dominant position in Norway's prolific oil and gas fields, combined with government backing and decades of expertise in harsh offshore environments.
TotalEnergies is a global integrated energy company that produces and markets oil, natural gas, and increasingly renewable electricity. It generates revenue through four main segments: Exploration & Production (upstream oil and gas), Refining & Chemicals (downstream processing), Integrated Gas & Power (LNG and electricity), and Marketing & Services (retail fuel stations). The company's competitive advantage lies in its integrated model—spanning upstream production to downstream retail—and its strategic pivot toward low-carbon energy including LNG and renewables.
Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Financial Metrics Comparison
Side-by-side fundamentals across 2 stocks. BestLagging
Financial Scorecard
TTE leads in 2 of 6 categories (Financial Metrics, Total Returns). EQNR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
Financial Metrics (TTM)
TTE is the larger business by revenue, generating $182.6B annually — 1.7x EQNR's $106.2B. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 7.2% (TTE) to 4.7% (EQNR).
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | TTETotalEnergies SE |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $106.2B | $182.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $37.2B | $34.5B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5.0B | $13.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $6.0B | $10.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +33.7% | +20.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.7% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +4.7% | +7.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.6% | +5.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -3.4% | -1.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -28.8% | -22.9% |
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, TTE trades at a 13% valuation discount to EQNR's 15.3x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, EQNR's 2.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TTE's 5.8x.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | TTETotalEnergies SE |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $74.5B | $172.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $102.9B | $206.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.30x | 13.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.35x | 12.23x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 2.77x | 5.80x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 0.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.92x | 1.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.42x | 15.92x |
Profitability & Efficiency
EQNR delivers a 12.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $12 in annual profit, vs $11 for TTE. TTE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.52x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to EQNR's 0.83x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), EQNR scores 5/9 vs TTE's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | TTETotalEnergies SE |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +12.4% | +11.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.8% | +4.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +30.7% | +10.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +27.8% | +11.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.83x | 0.52x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $28.4B | $34.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5.0B | $26.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $33.4B | $61.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 18.46x | 6.07x |
Total Returns (with DRIP)
A $10,000 investment in TTE five years ago would be worth $21,325 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $21,062 for EQNR. Over the past 12 months, TTE leads with a +43.1% total return vs EQNR's +33.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TTE at 14.4% vs EQNR's 7.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | TTETotalEnergies SE |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +22.6% | +22.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +33.0% | +43.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +23.0% | +49.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +110.6% | +113.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +209.4% | +155.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +7.1% | +14.4% |
Risk & Volatility
EQNR is the less volatile stock with a 0.49 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TTE's 0.49 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | TTETotalEnergies SE |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.49x | 0.49x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $29.93 | $80.35 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $21.41 | $52.78 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +99.6% | +100.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 64.0 | 71.4 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.4M | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates EQNR as "Hold" and TTE as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 176.6% upside for EQNR (target: $83) vs -6.6% for TTE (target: $75). For income investors, EQNR offers the higher dividend yield at 6.19% vs TTE's 4.75%.
| Metric | EQNREquinor ASA | TTETotalEnergies SE |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $82.50 | $75.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 23 | 33 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +6.2% | +4.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 2 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.85 | $3.82 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +8.0% | +4.7% |
Historical Charts
Charts are rendered on first load. Hover for details.
Chart 1Total Return — 5 Years (Rebased to 100)
| Stock | Mar 20 | Feb 26 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinor ASA (EQNR) | 100 | 162.8 | +62.8% |
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | 100 | 161.82 | +61.8% |
TotalEnergies SE (TTE) returned +113% over 5 years vs Equinor ASA (EQNR)'s +111%. A $10,000 investment in TTE 5 years ago would be worth $21,325 today (including dividends reinvested).
Chart 2Revenue Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinor ASA (EQNR) | $45.7B | $106.2B | +132.4% |
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | $127.9B | $189.8B | +48.3% |
Equinor ASA's revenue grew from $45.7B (2016) to $106.2B (2025) — a 9.8% CAGR. TotalEnergies SE's revenue grew from $127.9B (2016) to $189.8B (2025) — a 4.5% CAGR.
Chart 3Net Margin Trend — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinor ASA (EQNR) | -6.4% | 4.8% | +174.5% |
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | 4.8% | 7.2% | +48.6% |
Equinor ASA's net margin went from -6% (2016) to 5% (2025). TotalEnergies SE's net margin went from 5% (2016) to 7% (2025).
Chart 4P/E Ratio History — 8 Years
| Stock | 2017 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinor ASA (EQNR) | 15.3 | 12.1 | -20.9% |
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | 13.2 | 10.9 | -17.4% |
Equinor ASA has traded in a 4x–36x P/E range over 8 years; current trailing P/E is ~15x. TotalEnergies SE has traded in a 8x–13x P/E range over 6 years; current trailing P/E is ~13x.
Chart 5EPS Growth — 10 Years
| Stock | 2016 | 2025 | Change |
|---|---|---|---|
| Equinor ASA (EQNR) | -0.91 | 1.95 | +314.3% |
| TotalEnergies SE (TTE) | 0 | 6.02 | — |
Equinor ASA's EPS grew from $-0.91 (2016) to $1.95 (2025). TotalEnergies SE's EPS grew from $0.00 (2016) to $6.02 (2025).
Chart 6Free Cash Flow — 5 Years
Equinor ASA generated $6B FCF in 2025 (-71% vs 2021). TotalEnergies SE generated $11B FCF in 2025 (-40% vs 2021).
EQNR vs TTE: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EQNR or TTE a better buy right now?
TotalEnergies SE (TTE) offers the better valuation at 13.3x trailing P/E (12.2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TotalEnergies SE (TTE) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EQNR or TTE?
On trailing P/E, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the cheapest at 13.3x versus Equinor ASA at 15.3x. On forward P/E, Equinor ASA is actually cheaper at 11.4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EQNR or TTE?
Over the past 5 years, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) delivered a total return of +113.3%, compared to +110.6% for Equinor ASA (EQNR). A $10,000 investment in TTE five years ago would be worth approximately $21K today (assuming dividends reinvested). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EQNR returned +209.4% versus TTE's +155.4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EQNR or TTE?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equinor ASA (EQNR) is the lower-risk stock at 0.49β versus TotalEnergies SE's 0.49β — meaning TTE is approximately 1% more volatile than EQNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 83% for Equinor ASA — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which has better profit margins — EQNR or TTE?
TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the more profitable company, earning 7.2% net margin versus 4.8% for Equinor ASA — meaning it keeps 7.2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQNR leads at 25.7% versus 11.5% for TTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EQNR leads at 26.8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is EQNR or TTE more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Equinor ASA (EQNR) trades at 11.4x forward P/E versus 12.2x for TotalEnergies SE — 0.9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EQNR: 176.6% to $82.50.
07Which pays a better dividend — EQNR or TTE?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends. Equinor ASA (EQNR) offers the highest yield at 6.2%, versus 4.8% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE).
08Is EQNR or TTE better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Equinor ASA (EQNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.49), 6.2% yield, +209.4% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EQNR: +209.4%, TTE: +155.4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between EQNR and TTE?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that beat both.