EQNR vs TTE

For growth investors, Equinor ASA (EQNR) is the stronger pick with 3.

6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -6. 8% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE). TotalEnergies SE (TTE) offers the better valuation at 15. 6x trailing P/E (8. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate TotalEnergies SE (TTE) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the cheapest at 15.

6x versus Equinor ASA at 19. 5x. On forward P/E, Equinor ASA is actually cheaper at 8. 0x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) delivered a total return of +149.

4%, compared to +131. 9% for Equinor ASA (EQNR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EQNR returned +222. 2% versus TTE's +174. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Equinor ASA (EQNR) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

43β versus TotalEnergies SE's -0. 05β — meaning TTE is approximately -89% more volatile than EQNR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TotalEnergies SE (TTE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 52% versus 83% for Equinor ASA — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Equinor ASA (EQNR) is pulling ahead at 3.

6% versus -6. 8% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: TotalEnergies SE grew EPS -13. 6% year-over-year, compared to -37. 3% for Equinor ASA. Over a 3-year CAGR, EQNR leads at -10. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

TotalEnergies SE (TTE) is the more profitable company, earning 7.

2% net margin versus 4. 8% for Equinor ASA — meaning it keeps 7. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQNR leads at 25. 7% versus 10. 9% for TTE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TTE leads at 28. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Equinor ASA (EQNR) trades at 8.

0x forward P/E versus 8. 5x for TotalEnergies SE — 0. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EQNR: -4. 0% to $36. 50.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Equinor ASA (EQNR) offers the highest yield at 4. 9%, versus 4. 2% for TotalEnergies SE (TTE).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Equinor ASA (EQNR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

43), 4. 9% yield, +222. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EQNR: +222. 2%, TTE: +174. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: EQNR is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; TTE is a large-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.