EQR vs CPT

For growth investors, Equity Residential (EQR) is the stronger pick with 4.

1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for Camden Property Trust (CPT). Equity Residential (EQR) offers the better valuation at 22. 6x trailing P/E (50. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Equity Residential (EQR) a "Hold" — based on 46 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Equity Residential (EQR) is the cheapest at 22.

6x versus Camden Property Trust at 29. 4x. On forward P/E, Equity Residential is actually cheaper at 50. 6x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Camden Property Trust wins at 2. 91x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x.

Over the past 5 years, Equity Residential (EQR) delivered a total return of +6.

7%, compared to +0. 8% for Camden Property Trust (CPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CPT returned +66. 8% versus EQR's +29. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Camden Property Trust (CPT) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

36β versus Equity Residential's 0. 38β — meaning EQR is approximately 4% more volatile than CPT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Equity Residential (EQR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 77% versus 88% for Camden Property Trust — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Equity Residential (EQR) is pulling ahead at 4.

1% versus 1. 9% for Camden Property Trust (CPT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Camden Property Trust grew EPS 136. 0% year-over-year, compared to 7. 0% for Equity Residential. Over a 3-year CAGR, EQR leads at 4. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Equity Residential (EQR) is the more profitable company, earning 36.

1% net margin versus 24. 4% for Camden Property Trust — meaning it keeps 36. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EQR leads at 36. 3% versus 18. 4% for CPT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CPT leads at 61. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Camden Property Trust (CPT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 91x versus Equity Residential's 9. 94x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Equity Residential (EQR) trades at 50. 6x forward P/E versus 67. 9x for Camden Property Trust — 17. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CPT: 8. 1% to $112. 48.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Equity Residential (EQR) offers the highest yield at 4. 1%, versus 4. 1% for Camden Property Trust (CPT).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Camden Property Trust (CPT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

36), 4. 1% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CPT: +66. 8%, EQR: +29. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Real Estate sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.