Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ESE vs RBC vs ITRI vs TRMB vs LDOS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Information Technology Services
ESE vs RBC vs ITRI vs TRMB vs LDOS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $8.62B | $20.01B | $3.60B | $14.65B | $16.51B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.25B | $1.79B | $2.35B | $3.69B | $17.48B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $308M | $269M | $289M | $456M | $1.36B |
| Gross Margin | 21.7% | 44.3% | 38.6% | 68.8% | 17.3% |
| Operating Margin | 13.7% | 23.8% | 13.2% | 17.7% | 11.6% |
| Forward P/E | 40.9x | 50.3x | 13.5x | 20.0x | 11.1x |
| Total Debt | $230M | $1.03B | $1.29B | $1.39B | $5.93B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $101M | $37M | $1.02B | $253M | $1.20B |
ESE vs RBC vs ITRI vs TRMB vs LDOS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| ESCO Technologies I… (ESE) | 100 | 403.1 | +303.1% |
| RBC Bearings Incorp… (RBC) | 100 | 769.2 | +669.2% |
| Itron, Inc. (ITRI) | 100 | 126.0 | +26.0% |
| Trimble Inc. (TRMB) | 100 | 158.1 | +58.1% |
| Leidos Holdings, In… (LDOS) | 100 | 124.6 | +24.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESE vs RBC vs ITRI vs TRMB vs LDOS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 19.2%, EPS growth 193.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.5%
- 19.2% revenue growth vs ITRI's -3.0%
- 24.7% margin vs LDOS's 7.8%
- +103.8% vs ITRI's -23.7%
RBC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs ESE's 7.7%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 33.9%, current ratio 3.26x
ITRI lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
Among these 5 stocks, TRMB doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
LDOS is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.42, yield 1.2%
- PEG 0.54 vs TRMB's 8.15
- Beta 0.42, yield 1.2%, current ratio 1.70x
- Lower P/E (11.1x vs 20.0x), PEG 0.54 vs 8.15
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.2% revenue growth vs ITRI's -3.0% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (11.1x vs 20.0x), PEG 0.54 vs 8.15 | |
| Quality / Margins | 24.7% margin vs LDOS's 7.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.42 vs ITRI's 1.53 | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs ESE's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +103.8% vs ITRI's -23.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.7% ROA vs TRMB's 5.0%, ROIC 8.7% vs 6.8% |
ESE vs RBC vs ITRI vs TRMB vs LDOS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ESE vs RBC vs ITRI vs TRMB vs LDOS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
LDOS leads in 2 of 6 categories
ESE leads 1 • RBC leads 0 • ITRI leads 0 • TRMB leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — ESE and RBC and TRMB each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
LDOS is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.5B annually — 14.0x ESE's $1.2B. ESE is the more profitable business, keeping 24.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to LDOS's 7.8%. On growth, RBC holds the edge at +17.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.2B | $1.8B | $2.3B | $3.7B | $17.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $218M | $548M | $367M | $785M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $308M | $269M | $289M | $456M | $1.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $274M | $330M | $393M | $253M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +21.7% | +44.3% | +38.6% | +68.8% | +17.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +13.7% | +23.8% | +13.2% | +17.7% | +11.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +24.7% | +15.0% | +12.3% | +12.4% | +7.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +18.4% | +16.7% | +6.9% | +9.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +16.5% | +17.0% | -3.3% | +11.8% | +3.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +11.7% | +17.0% | -16.9% | +55.6% | -7.6% |
Valuation Metrics
LDOS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.8x trailing earnings, LDOS trades at a 85% valuation discount to RBC's 79.5x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), ESE offers better value at 0.43x vs TRMB's 14.39x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $8.6B | $20.0B | $3.6B | $14.7B | $16.5B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $8.8B | $21.0B | $3.9B | $15.8B | $21.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 28.83x | 79.45x | 12.46x | 35.34x | 11.79x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 40.87x | 50.32x | 13.47x | 20.01x | 11.08x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.43x | 9.07x | — | 14.39x | 0.57x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 35.27x | 42.86x | 10.48x | 20.05x | 8.82x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.87x | 12.23x | 1.52x | 4.08x | 0.96x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 5.60x | 6.13x | 2.15x | 2.54x | 3.50x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 45.44x | 82.06x | 9.44x | 110.00x | 10.16x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ESE and LDOS each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
LDOS delivers a 27.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $27 in annual profit, vs $8 for TRMB. ESE carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LDOS's 1.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LDOS scores 8/9 vs ESE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.4% | +8.2% | +17.2% | +8.0% | +27.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.7% | +5.2% | +7.7% | +5.0% | +9.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.7% | +6.9% | +13.1% | +6.8% | +17.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +10.2% | +8.5% | +11.4% | +7.8% | +21.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 7 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.15x | 0.34x | 0.74x | 0.24x | 1.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $129M | $992M | $267M | $1.1B | $4.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $101M | $37M | $1.0B | $253M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $230M | $1.0B | $1.3B | $1.4B | $5.9B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.86x | 7.78x | 14.38x | 12.26x | 9.91x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ESE leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RBC five years ago would be worth $40,698 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,797 for TRMB. Over the past 12 months, ESE leads with a +103.8% total return vs ITRI's -23.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESE at 51.3% vs ITRI's 6.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +68.6% | +33.3% | -14.1% | -21.0% | -28.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +103.8% | +78.8% | -23.7% | -6.7% | -14.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +246.3% | +173.5% | +20.8% | +30.1% | +71.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +205.5% | +307.0% | -7.2% | -22.0% | +33.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +773.0% | +867.2% | +94.4% | +166.8% | +223.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +51.3% | +39.9% | +6.5% | +9.2% | +19.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — RBC and LDOS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LDOS is the less volatile stock with a 0.42 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than ITRI's 1.53 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. RBC currently trades 96.8% from its 52-week high vs ITRI's 57.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.19x | 1.05x | 1.53x | 1.46x | 0.42x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $346.20 | $632.00 | $142.00 | $87.50 | $205.77 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $162.74 | $339.53 | $78.53 | $61.63 | $129.35 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +96.2% | +96.8% | +57.1% | +70.7% | +63.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 67.4 | 66.1 | 35.2 | 36.8 | 24.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 297K | 176K | 893K | 1.7M | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
LDOS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: ESE as "Buy", RBC as "Buy", ITRI as "Hold", TRMB as "Buy", LDOS as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 68.8% upside for ITRI (target: $137) vs -6.4% for RBC (target: $573). LDOS is the only dividend payer here at 1.21% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $350.00 | $572.60 | $137.00 | $95.00 | $204.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 26 | 37 | 28 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +0.1% | — | — | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 0 | 1 | — | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.32 | $0.57 | — | — | $1.59 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% | +2.8% | +5.9% | +5.7% |
LDOS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). ESE leads in 1 (Total Returns). 3 tied.
ESE vs RBC vs ITRI vs TRMB vs LDOS: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESE or RBC or ITRI or TRMB or LDOS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, ESCO Technologies Inc.
(ESE) is the stronger pick with 19. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 0% for Itron, Inc. (ITRI). Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (11. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) a "Buy" — based on 15 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESE or RBC or ITRI or TRMB or LDOS?
On trailing P/E, Leidos Holdings, Inc.
(LDOS) is the cheapest at 11. 8x versus RBC Bearings Incorporated at 79. 5x. On forward P/E, Leidos Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Leidos Holdings, Inc. wins at 0. 54x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 15x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESE or RBC or ITRI or TRMB or LDOS?
Over the past 5 years, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) delivered a total return of +307.
0%, compared to -22. 0% for Trimble Inc. (TRMB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RBC returned +867. 2% versus ITRI's +94. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESE or RBC or ITRI or TRMB or LDOS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Leidos Holdings, Inc.
(LDOS) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 42β versus Itron, Inc. 's 1. 53β — meaning ITRI is approximately 261% more volatile than LDOS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, ESCO Technologies Inc. (ESE) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 119% for Leidos Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESE or RBC or ITRI or TRMB or LDOS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), ESCO Technologies Inc.
(ESE) is pulling ahead at 19. 2% versus -3. 0% for Itron, Inc. (ITRI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: ESCO Technologies Inc. grew EPS 193. 1% year-over-year, compared to -71. 3% for Trimble Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBC leads at 20. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESE or RBC or ITRI or TRMB or LDOS?
ESCO Technologies Inc.
(ESE) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 3% net margin versus 8. 5% for Leidos Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RBC leads at 22. 6% versus 12. 3% for LDOS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRMB leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESE or RBC or ITRI or TRMB or LDOS more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 54x versus Trimble Inc. 's 8. 15x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) trades at 11. 1x forward P/E versus 50. 3x for RBC Bearings Incorporated — 39. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for ITRI: 68. 8% to $137. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESE or RBC or ITRI or TRMB or LDOS?
In this comparison, LDOS (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. ESE, RBC, ITRI, TRMB do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ESE or RBC or ITRI or TRMB or LDOS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Leidos Holdings, Inc.
(LDOS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 42), 1. 2% yield, +223. 8% 10Y return). Itron, Inc. (ITRI) carries a higher beta of 1. 53 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LDOS: +223. 8%, ITRI: +94. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESE and RBC and ITRI and TRMB and LDOS?
These companies operate in different sectors (ESE (Technology) and RBC (Industrials) and ITRI (Technology) and TRMB (Technology) and LDOS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ESE is a small-cap high-growth stock; RBC is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; ITRI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRMB is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; LDOS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. LDOS pays a dividend while ESE, RBC, ITRI, TRMB do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.