Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
RBC vs TKR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories
RBC vs TKR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories | Manufacturing - Tools & Accessories |
| Market Cap | $20.38B | $8.35B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.79B | $4.67B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $269M | $316M |
| Gross Margin | 44.3% | 20.4% |
| Operating Margin | 23.8% | 12.6% |
| Forward P/E | 51.3x | 20.3x |
| Total Debt | $1.03B | $2.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $37M | $365M |
RBC vs TKR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| RBC Bearings Incorp… (RBC) | 100 | 783.4 | +683.4% |
| The Timken Company (TKR) | 100 | 281.4 | +181.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: RBC vs TKR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
RBC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 4.9%, EPS growth 20.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.2%
- 8.7% 10Y total return vs TKR's 292.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.05, Low D/E 33.9%, current ratio 3.26x
TKR is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 16 yrs, beta 1.50, yield 1.2%
- Lower P/E (20.3x vs 51.3x)
- 1.2% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs RBC's 0.1%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 4.9% revenue growth vs TKR's 0.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (20.3x vs 51.3x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs TKR's 6.8% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.05 vs TKR's 1.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.2% yield, 16-year raise streak, vs RBC's 0.1% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +82.7% vs RBC's +82.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 5.2% ROA vs TKR's 4.7%, ROIC 6.9% vs 8.5% |
RBC vs TKR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
RBC vs TKR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TKR is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 2.6x RBC's $1.8B. RBC is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to TKR's 6.8%. On growth, RBC holds the edge at +17.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.8B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $548M | $766M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $269M | $316M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $330M | $383M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.3% | +20.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +23.8% | +12.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +15.0% | +6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +18.4% | +8.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.0% | +8.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.0% | +26.1% |
Valuation Metrics
TKR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 29.1x trailing earnings, TKR trades at a 64% valuation discount to RBC's 80.9x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), RBC offers better value at 9.24x vs TKR's 14.46x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $20.4B | $8.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $21.4B | $10.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 80.93x | 29.12x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 51.25x | 20.31x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 9.24x | 14.46x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 43.62x | 12.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 12.45x | 1.82x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 6.24x | 2.51x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 83.58x | 20.57x |
Profitability & Efficiency
RBC leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TKR delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $8 for RBC. RBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.34x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TKR's 0.64x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RBC scores 7/9 vs TKR's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.2% | +9.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +5.2% | +4.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.9% | +8.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +8.5% | +10.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.64x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $992M | $1.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $37M | $365M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1.0B | $2.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.78x | 6.17x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RBC leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RBC five years ago would be worth $41,339 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,955 for TKR. Over the past 12 months, TKR leads with a +82.7% total return vs RBC's +82.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RBC at 40.7% vs TKR's 17.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +35.8% | +39.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +82.4% | +82.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +178.6% | +62.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +313.4% | +39.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +869.6% | +292.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +40.7% | +17.6% |
Risk & Volatility
RBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RBC is the less volatile stock with a 1.05 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TKR's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.05x | 1.50x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $631.88 | $123.67 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $337.43 | $65.49 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +98.6% | +96.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 57.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 177K | 757K |
Analyst Outlook
TKR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates RBC as "Buy" and TKR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -3.7% upside for TKR (target: $115) vs -8.1% for RBC (target: $573). TKR is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $572.60 | $115.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 26 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.1% | +1.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 16 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.57 | $1.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | +0.7% |
RBC leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). TKR leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).
RBC vs TKR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is RBC or TKR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the stronger pick with 4.
9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 2% for The Timken Company (TKR). The Timken Company (TKR) offers the better valuation at 29. 1x trailing P/E (20. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) a "Buy" — based on 26 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — RBC or TKR?
On trailing P/E, The Timken Company (TKR) is the cheapest at 29.
1x versus RBC Bearings Incorporated at 80. 9x. On forward P/E, The Timken Company is actually cheaper at 20. 3x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: RBC Bearings Incorporated wins at 5. 85x versus The Timken Company's 10. 08x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — RBC or TKR?
Over the past 5 years, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) delivered a total return of +313.
4%, compared to +39. 5% for The Timken Company (TKR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RBC returned +869. 6% versus TKR's +292. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — RBC or TKR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
05β versus The Timken Company's 1. 50β — meaning TKR is approximately 43% more volatile than RBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 34% versus 64% for The Timken Company — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — RBC or TKR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is pulling ahead at 4.
9% versus 0. 2% for The Timken Company (TKR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: RBC Bearings Incorporated grew EPS 20. 3% year-over-year, compared to -17. 6% for The Timken Company. Over a 3-year CAGR, RBC leads at 20. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — RBC or TKR?
RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the more profitable company, earning 15.
0% net margin versus 6. 3% for The Timken Company — meaning it keeps 15. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RBC leads at 22. 6% versus 12. 4% for TKR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RBC leads at 44. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is RBC or TKR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 5. 85x versus The Timken Company's 10. 08x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, The Timken Company (TKR) trades at 20. 3x forward P/E versus 51. 3x for RBC Bearings Incorporated — 30. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TKR: -3. 7% to $115. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — RBC or TKR?
In this comparison, TKR (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. RBC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is RBC or TKR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RBC Bearings Incorporated (RBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
05), +869. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (RBC: +869. 6%, TKR: +292. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between RBC and TKR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
TKR pays a dividend while RBC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.