ESLT vs CACI

For growth investors, Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) is the stronger pick with 23. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 6% for CACI International Inc (CACI). CACI International Inc (CACI) offers the better valuation at 22. 4x trailing P/E (17. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate CACI International Inc (CACI) a "Buy" — based on 29 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, CACI International Inc (CACI) is the cheapest at 22.

4x versus Elbit Systems Ltd. at 67. 3x. On forward P/E, CACI International Inc is actually cheaper at 17. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: CACI International Inc wins at 1. 46x versus Elbit Systems Ltd. 's 3. 64x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

Over the past 5 years, Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) delivered a total return of +518. 9%, compared to +90. 8% for CACI International Inc (CACI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: ESLT returned +779. 1% versus CACI's +423. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), CACI International Inc (CACI) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

30β versus Elbit Systems Ltd. 's 0. 35β — meaning ESLT is approximately 18% more volatile than CACI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Elbit Systems Ltd. (ESLT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 86% for CACI International Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) is pulling ahead at 23. 9% versus 12. 6% for CACI International Inc (CACI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Elbit Systems Ltd. grew EPS 71. 7% year-over-year, compared to 20. 0% for CACI International Inc. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESLT leads at 17. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) is the more profitable company, earning 6. 7% net margin versus 5. 8% for CACI International Inc — meaning it keeps 6. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CACI leads at 8. 9% versus 8. 8% for ESLT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — ESLT leads at 24. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, CACI International Inc (CACI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 46x versus Elbit Systems Ltd. 's 3. 64x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, CACI International Inc (CACI) trades at 17. 7x forward P/E versus 59. 8x for Elbit Systems Ltd. — 42. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for CACI: 45. 3% to $725. 50.

In this comparison, ESLT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. CACI does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Elbit Systems Ltd.

(ESLT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 35), +779. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (ESLT: +779. 1%, CACI: +423. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (ESLT (Industrials) and CACI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: ESLT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; CACI is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.