Engineering & Construction
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
ESOA vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM vs PWR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
Engineering & Construction
ESOA vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM vs PWR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction | Engineering & Construction |
| Market Cap | $286M | $1.10B | $6.65B | $5.86B | $112.65B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $424M | $684M | $3.82B | $7.49B | $29.99B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $2M | $56M | $142M | $248M | $1.12B |
| Gross Margin | 10.0% | 38.2% | 11.9% | 10.4% | 13.6% |
| Operating Margin | 1.8% | 6.5% | 5.1% | 4.9% | 5.8% |
| Forward P/E | 30.2x | 18.1x | 44.0x | 18.1x | 57.4x |
| Total Debt | $72M | $69M | $104M | $1.28B | $1.19B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $12M | $66M | $150M | $541M | $440M |
ESOA vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM vs PWR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Energy Services of … (ESOA) | 100 | 1813.7 | +1713.7% |
| Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) | 100 | 304.6 | +204.6% |
| MYR Group Inc. (MYRG) | 100 | 1483.4 | +1383.4% |
| Primoris Services C… (PRIM) | 100 | 647.2 | +547.2% |
| Quanta Services, In… (PWR) | 100 | 2032.8 | +1932.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESOA vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM vs PWR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESOA is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.
- Dividend streak 3 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 0.5%
- Beta 1.52, yield 0.5%, current ratio 0.05x
- 0.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
WLDN carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 20.5%, EPS growth 120.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.7%
- 20.5% revenue growth vs MYRG's 8.8%
- 8.2% margin vs ESOA's 0.5%
- 11.0% ROA vs ESOA's 1.1%, ROIC 11.5% vs 3.1%
MYRG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.
- +175.2% vs PRIM's +62.4%
PRIM is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.98 vs PWR's 3.33
- Lower P/E (18.1x vs 57.4x), PEG 0.98 vs 3.33
PWR is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 31.4% 10Y total return vs ESOA's 10.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.30, Low D/E 13.2%, current ratio 1.14x
- Beta 1.30 vs WLDN's 1.96, lower leverage
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 20.5% revenue growth vs MYRG's 8.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (18.1x vs 57.4x), PEG 0.98 vs 3.33 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.2% margin vs ESOA's 0.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.30 vs WLDN's 1.96, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.5% yield, 3-year raise streak, vs PWR's 0.1%, (2 stocks pay no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +175.2% vs PRIM's +62.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.0% ROA vs ESOA's 1.1%, ROIC 11.5% vs 3.1% |
ESOA vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM vs PWR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
ESOA vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM vs PWR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
WLDN leads in 1 of 6 categories
PRIM leads 1 • MYRG leads 1 • ESOA leads 1 • PWR leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WLDN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PWR is the larger business by revenue, generating $30.0B annually — 70.7x ESOA's $424M. WLDN is the more profitable business, keeping 8.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ESOA's 0.5%. On growth, PWR holds the edge at +26.3% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $424M | $684M | $3.8B | $7.5B | $30.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $17M | $64M | $261M | $437M | $2.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $2M | $56M | $142M | $248M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $17M | $43M | $231M | $165M | $1.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +10.0% | +38.2% | +11.9% | +10.4% | +13.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +1.8% | +6.5% | +5.1% | +4.9% | +5.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +0.5% | +8.2% | +3.7% | +3.3% | +3.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +3.9% | +6.3% | +6.0% | +2.2% | +5.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +13.4% | +1.8% | +20.0% | -5.4% | +26.3% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +2.1% | +71.9% | +106.2% | -60.5% | +51.0% |
Valuation Metrics
PRIM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.3x trailing earnings, WLDN trades at a 97% valuation discount to ESOA's 755.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), PRIM offers better value at 1.17x vs PWR's 6.40x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $286M | $1.1B | $6.7B | $5.9B | $112.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $346M | $1.1B | $6.6B | $6.6B | $113.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 755.70x | 21.34x | 56.76x | 21.52x | 110.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 30.23x | 18.06x | 44.03x | 18.06x | 57.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 3.40x | 1.17x | 6.40x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 20.07x | 17.59x | 28.84x | 13.03x | 45.68x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.70x | 1.62x | 1.82x | 0.77x | 3.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 4.85x | 3.68x | 10.18x | 3.52x | 12.61x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 47.64x | 15.59x | 28.66x | 17.20x | 69.50x |
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MYRG delivers a 22.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $22 in annual profit, vs $4 for ESOA. PWR carries lower financial leverage with a 0.13x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to ESOA's 1.22x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MYRG scores 8/9 vs ESOA's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +3.7% | +19.4% | +22.1% | +15.2% | +13.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +11.0% | +8.7% | +5.6% | +4.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +3.1% | +11.5% | +18.3% | +13.6% | +11.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.1% | +12.4% | +19.4% | +16.3% | +11.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 7 | 8 | 5 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.22x | 0.23x | 0.16x | 0.76x | 0.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $72M | $3M | -$47M | $735M | $748M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $12M | $66M | $150M | $541M | $440M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $72M | $69M | $104M | $1.3B | $1.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.31x | 12.45x | 39.49x | 21.02x | 6.27x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
ESOA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in ESOA five years ago would be worth $85,882 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $19,696 for WLDN. Over the past 12 months, MYRG leads with a +175.2% total return vs PRIM's +62.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors ESOA at 98.6% vs MYRG's 47.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +113.3% | -30.2% | +88.5% | -17.2% | +70.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +84.8% | +85.8% | +175.2% | +62.4% | +132.1% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +683.4% | +339.1% | +219.8% | +346.5% | +345.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +758.8% | +97.0% | +417.6% | +234.4% | +651.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +1078.0% | +581.3% | +1680.8% | +402.0% | +3143.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +98.6% | +63.8% | +47.3% | +64.7% | +64.5% |
Risk & Volatility
PWR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PWR is the less volatile stock with a 1.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than WLDN's 1.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PWR currently trades 95.2% from its 52-week high vs PRIM's 52.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.52x | 1.96x | 1.70x | 1.83x | 1.30x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $18.13 | $137.00 | $475.39 | $205.50 | $788.72 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $7.83 | $39.57 | $152.10 | $65.23 | $315.45 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.0% | +54.4% | +89.9% | +52.6% | +95.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 73.3 | 46.8 | 80.7 | 30.3 | 87.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 130K | 345K | 306K | 1.1M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — ESOA and PWR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: WLDN as "Buy", MYRG as "Hold", PRIM as "Buy", PWR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.8% upside for WLDN (target: $118) vs -15.3% for MYRG (target: $362). For income investors, ESOA offers the higher dividend yield at 0.52% vs PRIM's 0.29%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Hold | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $117.50 | $362.00 | $160.63 | $647.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 | 21 | 22 | 35 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.5% | — | — | +0.3% | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 3 | 0 | 4 | 2 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.09 | — | — | $0.32 | $0.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | 0.0% | +1.2% | +0.2% | +0.1% |
WLDN leads in 1 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow). PRIM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
ESOA vs WLDN vs MYRG vs PRIM vs PWR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESOA or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM or PWR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the stronger pick with 20. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) offers the better valuation at 21. 3x trailing P/E (18. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESOA or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM or PWR?
On trailing P/E, Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the cheapest at 21. 3x versus Energy Services of America Corporation at 755. 7x. On forward P/E, Primoris Services Corporation is actually cheaper at 18. 1x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Primoris Services Corporation wins at 0. 98x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESOA or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM or PWR?
Over the past 5 years, Energy Services of America Corporation (ESOA) delivered a total return of +758.
8%, compared to +97. 0% for Willdan Group, Inc. (WLDN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PWR returned +31. 4% versus PRIM's +402. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESOA or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM or PWR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Quanta Services, Inc.
(PWR) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 30β versus Willdan Group, Inc. 's 1. 96β — meaning WLDN is approximately 50% more volatile than PWR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 13% versus 122% for Energy Services of America Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — ESOA or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM or PWR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is pulling ahead at 20. 5% versus 8. 8% for MYR Group Inc. (MYRG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: MYR Group Inc. grew EPS 311. 5% year-over-year, compared to -98. 5% for Energy Services of America Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, ESOA leads at 27. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESOA or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM or PWR?
Willdan Group, Inc.
(WLDN) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 7% net margin versus 0. 1% for Energy Services of America Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: WLDN leads at 6. 5% versus 1. 0% for ESOA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — WLDN leads at 37. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESOA or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM or PWR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 98x versus Quanta Services, Inc. 's 3. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) trades at 18. 1x forward P/E versus 57. 4x for Quanta Services, Inc. — 39. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for WLDN: 57. 8% to $117. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESOA or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM or PWR?
In this comparison, ESOA (0.
5% yield), PRIM (0. 3% yield) pay a dividend. WLDN, MYRG, PWR do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ESOA or WLDN or MYRG or PRIM or PWR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Energy Services of America Corporation (ESOA) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
5% yield, +1078% 10Y return). Primoris Services Corporation (PRIM) carries a higher beta of 1. 83 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ESOA: +1078%, PRIM: +402. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESOA and WLDN and MYRG and PRIM and PWR?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: ESOA is a small-cap high-growth stock; WLDN is a small-cap high-growth stock; MYRG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PRIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; PWR is a mid-cap high-growth stock. ESOA pays a dividend while WLDN, MYRG, PRIM, PWR do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.