Electrical Equipment & Parts
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
ESP vs PLTR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
ESP vs PLTR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Electrical Equipment & Parts | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $183M | $294.39B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $42M | $5.22B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $11M | $2.28B |
| Gross Margin | 36.5% | 84.1% |
| Operating Margin | 25.4% | 38.1% |
| Forward P/E | 16.2x | 88.1x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $229M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $19M | $1.42B |
ESP vs PLTR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Sep 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Espey Mfg. & Electr… (ESP) | 100 | 320.9 | +220.9% |
| Palantir Technologi… (PLTR) | 100 | 1352.3 | +1252.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: ESP vs PLTR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
ESP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 0.74, yield 1.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.74, current ratio 2.66x
- Beta 0.74, yield 1.6%, current ratio 2.66x
PLTR is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 56.2%, EPS growth 231.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 32.9%
- 12.5% 10Y total return vs ESP's 167.4%
- 56.2% revenue growth vs ESP's 13.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 56.2% revenue growth vs ESP's 13.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.2x vs 88.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 43.7% margin vs ESP's 25.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.74 vs PLTR's 1.79 | |
| Dividends | 1.6% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +53.2% vs PLTR's -8.2% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.4% ROA vs ESP's 12.5%, ROIC 22.3% vs 17.7% |
ESP vs PLTR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
ESP vs PLTR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PLTR is the larger business by revenue, generating $5.2B annually — 123.7x ESP's $42M. PLTR is the more profitable business, keeping 43.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to ESP's 25.5%. On growth, PLTR holds the edge at +84.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $42M | $5.2B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $11M | $2.0B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $11M | $2.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $4M | $2.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +36.5% | +84.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +25.4% | +38.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.5% | +43.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.4% | +51.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +10.9% | +84.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +57.1% | +3.1% |
Valuation Metrics
ESP leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 20.2x trailing earnings, ESP trades at a 90% valuation discount to PLTR's 203.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, ESP's 19.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PLTR's 203.6x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $183M | $294.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $164M | $293.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 20.19x | 203.92x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.17x | 88.12x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.46x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 19.09x | 203.58x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.16x | 65.78x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.23x | 44.01x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.99x | 140.14x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PLTR leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PLTR delivers a 31.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $20 for ESP. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PLTR scores 8/9 vs ESP's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +20.4% | +31.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +12.5% | +26.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +17.7% | +22.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.6% | +21.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.03x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$19M | -$1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $19M | $1.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $229M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PLTR leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PLTR five years ago would be worth $50,639 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $43,352 for ESP. Over the past 12 months, ESP leads with a +53.2% total return vs PLTR's -8.2%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PLTR at 101.1% vs ESP's 54.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +31.1% | -23.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +53.2% | -8.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +270.2% | +713.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +333.5% | +406.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +167.4% | +1252.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +54.7% | +101.1% |
Risk & Volatility
ESP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
ESP is the less volatile stock with a 0.74 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PLTR's 1.79 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. ESP currently trades 81.5% from its 52-week high vs PLTR's 61.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.74x | 1.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $74.77 | $207.52 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.00 | $122.68 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.5% | +61.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 47.7 | 43.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 34K | 41.3M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates ESP as "Hold" and PLTR as "Hold". ESP is the only dividend payer here at 1.58% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $189.23 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 3 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.6% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.96 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.0% |
PLTR leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). ESP leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Risk & Volatility).
ESP vs PLTR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is ESP or PLTR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the stronger pick with 56. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 13. 5% for Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP). Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP) offers the better valuation at 20. 2x trailing P/E (16. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP) a "Hold" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — ESP or PLTR?
On trailing P/E, Espey Mfg.
& Electronics Corp. (ESP) is the cheapest at 20. 2x versus Palantir Technologies Inc. at 203. 9x. On forward P/E, Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. is actually cheaper at 16. 2x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — ESP or PLTR?
Over the past 5 years, Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) delivered a total return of +406. 4%, compared to +333. 5% for Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PLTR returned +1252% versus ESP's +167. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — ESP or PLTR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Espey Mfg.
& Electronics Corp. (ESP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 74β versus Palantir Technologies Inc. 's 1. 79β — meaning PLTR is approximately 142% more volatile than ESP relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — ESP or PLTR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is pulling ahead at 56. 2% versus 13. 5% for Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. (ESP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Palantir Technologies Inc. grew EPS 231. 6% year-over-year, compared to 31. 9% for Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp.. Over a 3-year CAGR, PLTR leads at 32. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — ESP or PLTR?
Palantir Technologies Inc.
(PLTR) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 3% net margin versus 18. 5% for Espey Mfg. & Electronics Corp. — meaning it keeps 36. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PLTR leads at 31. 6% versus 18. 5% for ESP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PLTR leads at 82. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is ESP or PLTR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Espey Mfg.
& Electronics Corp. (ESP) trades at 16. 2x forward P/E versus 88. 1x for Palantir Technologies Inc. — 71. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis.
08Which pays a better dividend — ESP or PLTR?
In this comparison, ESP (1.
6% yield) pays a dividend. PLTR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is ESP or PLTR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Espey Mfg.
& Electronics Corp. (ESP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 74), 1. 6% yield, +167. 4% 10Y return). Palantir Technologies Inc. (PLTR) carries a higher beta of 1. 79 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (ESP: +167. 4%, PLTR: +1252%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between ESP and PLTR?
These companies operate in different sectors (ESP (Industrials) and PLTR (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: ESP is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PLTR is a large-cap high-growth stock. ESP pays a dividend while PLTR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.