Specialty Retail
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Specialty Retail
Engineering & Construction
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Asset Management
EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Retail | Specialty Retail | Engineering & Construction | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Asset Management |
| Market Cap | $659M | $137M | $83M | $255M | $222M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $418M | $411M | $106M | $263M | $97M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-51M | $-220M | $-126M | $44M | $49M |
| Gross Margin | 20.2% | 30.5% | 26.0% | 93.2% | 83.5% |
| Operating Margin | -27.2% | -51.1% | -119.5% | 29.2% | 77.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | — | 23.2x | 5.9x |
| Total Debt | $107M | $272M | $11M | $3M | $469M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $151M | $142M | $42M | $61M | $20M |
EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Nov 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) | 100 | 21.1 | -78.9% |
| ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT) | 100 | 0.9 | -99.1% |
| Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) | 100 | 2.9 | -97.1% |
| Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) | 100 | 619.8 | +519.8% |
| TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG) | 100 | 42.5 | -57.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 49.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 91.6%
- Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 27.7%, current ratio 2.19x
- Beta 2.04, current ratio 2.19x
- 49.6% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
CHPT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.61
Among these 5 stocks, BLNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
AMPY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 10.4% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 87.5%
- +140.8% vs CHPT's -45.4%
- 6.2% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs -109.7%
TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.
- Lower P/E (5.9x vs 23.2x)
- 50.6% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
- Beta 0.83 vs BLNK's 2.96
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 49.6% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.9x vs 23.2x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 50.6% margin vs BLNK's -118.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.83 vs BLNK's 2.96 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +140.8% vs CHPT's -45.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs -109.7% |
EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
AMPY leads in 4 of 6 categories
CHPT leads 1 • EVGO leads 0 • BLNK leads 0 • TPVG leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — AMPY and TPVG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
EVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $418M annually — 4.3x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLNK's -118.7%. On growth, EVGO holds the edge at +45.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $418M | $411M | $106M | $263M | $97M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$58M | -$180M | -$115M | $109M | $76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$51M | -$220M | -$126M | $44M | $49M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$165M | -$67M | -$47M | -$13.5B | $37M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +20.2% | +30.5% | +26.0% | +93.2% | +83.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -27.2% | -51.1% | -119.5% | +29.2% | +77.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -12.1% | -53.5% | -118.7% | +16.7% | +50.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -39.5% | -16.3% | -44.5% | -51.1% | -58.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +45.5% | +7.3% | +11.7% | -18.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -33.3% | +28.8% | +99.9% | +8394.1% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
AMPY leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 4.5x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 26% valuation discount to AMPY's 6.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMPY's 1.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TPVG's 8.9x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $659M | $137M | $83M | $255M | $222M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $614M | $267M | $52M | $197M | $671M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -6.77x | -0.67x | -0.37x | 6.08x | 4.49x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | — | 23.19x | 5.94x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | 4.43x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | — | 1.80x | 8.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.71x | 0.33x | 0.67x | 0.97x | 2.28x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 6.96x | 0.61x | 0.55x | 0.62x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | — | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
AMPY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TPVG delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. AMPY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHPT's 12.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMPY scores 7/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -13.3% | -3.5% | -131.9% | +10.6% | +14.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.5% | -25.8% | -66.7% | +6.2% | +6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -21.9% | -83.8% | -109.7% | +12.3% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -14.5% | -41.6% | -77.3% | +12.6% | +9.4% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.28x | 12.75x | 0.09x | 0.01x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$44M | $130M | -$31M | -$58M | $449M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $151M | $142M | $42M | $61M | $20M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $107M | $272M | $11M | $3M | $469M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -25.87x | -8.58x | -9064.60x | — | 2.86x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMPY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMPY five years ago would be worth $22,042 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for CHPT. Over the past 12 months, AMPY leads with a +140.8% total return vs CHPT's -45.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -1.5% vs CHPT's -67.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -31.8% | -10.1% | -2.2% | +35.2% | -14.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.2% | -45.4% | +1.3% | +140.8% | +9.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -66.0% | -96.4% | -89.9% | -12.4% | -4.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -82.2% | -98.6% | -97.9% | +120.4% | -23.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.6% | -96.8% | -97.9% | +1044.6% | +87.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -30.2% | -67.0% | -53.4% | -4.3% | -1.5% |
Risk & Volatility
AMPY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
AMPY is the less volatile stock with a -0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMPY currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 27.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 2.61x | 2.96x | -0.19x | 0.83x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $5.18 | $17.78 | $2.65 | $6.79 | $7.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.64 | $4.45 | $0.45 | $2.60 | $4.48 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +40.5% | +35.6% | +27.3% | +92.2% | +72.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.3 | 51.8 | 53.6 | 58.4 | 60.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.3M | 470K | 2.0M | 1.0M | 491K |
Analyst Outlook
CHPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EVGO as "Buy", CHPT as "Hold", AMPY as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 150.0% upside for EVGO (target: $5) vs 18.5% for CHPT (target: $8).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | — | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $5.25 | $7.50 | — | $10.25 | $8.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 21 | — | 5 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 | — | 0 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
AMPY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CHPT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EVgo, Inc.
(EVGO) is the stronger pick with 49. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 5x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?
On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 5x versus Amplify Energy Corp. at 6. 1x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?
Over the past 5 years, Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) delivered a total return of +120. 4%, compared to -98. 6% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMPY returned +1045% versus BLNK's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 19β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 2. 96β — meaning BLNK is approximately -1669% more volatile than AMPY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVgo, Inc.
(EVGO) is pulling ahead at 49. 6% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amplify Energy Corp. grew EPS 232. 3% year-over-year, compared to 24. 4% for EVgo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVGO leads at 91. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -159. 2% for Blink Charging Co. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -160. 6% for BLNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMPY leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
(TPVG) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 23. 2x for Amplify Energy Corp. — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVGO: 150. 0% to $5. 25.
08Which pays a better dividend — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amplify Energy Corp.
(AMPY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 19), +1045% 10Y return). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMPY: +1045%, BLNK: -97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EVGO and CHPT and BLNK and AMPY and TPVG?
These companies operate in different sectors (EVGO (Consumer Cyclical) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical) and BLNK (Industrials) and AMPY (Energy) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EVGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMPY is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.