Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
EVGO
EVgo, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$659M
5Y Perf.-78.9%
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.

Specialty Retail

Consumer CyclicalNYSE • US
Market Cap$137M
5Y Perf.-99.1%
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.

Engineering & Construction

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$83M
5Y Perf.-97.1%
AMPY
Amplify Energy Corp.

Oil & Gas Exploration & Production

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$255M
5Y Perf.+519.8%
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Asset Management

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$222M
5Y Perf.-57.5%

EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
EVGO logoEVGO
CHPT logoCHPT
BLNK logoBLNK
AMPY logoAMPY
TPVG logoTPVG
IndustrySpecialty RetailSpecialty RetailEngineering & ConstructionOil & Gas Exploration & ProductionAsset Management
Market Cap$659M$137M$83M$255M$222M
Revenue (TTM)$418M$411M$106M$263M$97M
Net Income (TTM)$-51M$-220M$-126M$44M$49M
Gross Margin20.2%30.5%26.0%93.2%83.5%
Operating Margin-27.2%-51.1%-119.5%29.2%77.9%
Forward P/E23.2x5.9x
Total Debt$107M$272M$11M$3M$469M
Cash & Equiv.$151M$142M$42M$61M$20M

EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVGLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

EVGO
CHPT
BLNK
AMPY
TPVG
StockNov 20May 26Return
EVgo, Inc. (EVGO)10021.1-78.9%
ChargePoint Holding… (CHPT)1000.9-99.1%
Blink Charging Co. (BLNK)1002.9-97.1%
Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY)100619.8+519.8%
TriplePoint Venture… (TPVG)10042.5-57.5%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TPVG leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Amplify Energy Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment and operational efficiency and capital deployment. EVGO also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
EVGO
EVgo, Inc.
The Growth Play

EVGO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 49.6%, EPS growth 24.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 91.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 2.04, Low D/E 27.7%, current ratio 2.19x
  • Beta 2.04, current ratio 2.19x
  • 49.6% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
CHPT
ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
The Income Pick

CHPT is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.

  • Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 2.61
Best for: income & stability
BLNK
Blink Charging Co.
The Industrials Pick

Among these 5 stocks, BLNK doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
AMPY
Amplify Energy Corp.
The Long-Run Compounder

AMPY is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.

  • 10.4% 10Y total return vs TPVG's 87.5%
  • +140.8% vs CHPT's -45.4%
  • 6.2% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs -109.7%
Best for: long-term compounding
TPVG
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Banking Pick

TPVG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for value and quality.

  • Lower P/E (5.9x vs 23.2x)
  • 50.6% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
  • Beta 0.83 vs BLNK's 2.96
Best for: value and quality
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthEVGO logoEVGO49.6% revenue growth vs BLNK's -11.2%
ValueTPVG logoTPVGLower P/E (5.9x vs 23.2x)
Quality / MarginsTPVG logoTPVG50.6% margin vs BLNK's -118.7%
Stability / SafetyTPVG logoTPVGBeta 0.83 vs BLNK's 2.96
DividendsTieNone of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)AMPY logoAMPY+140.8% vs CHPT's -45.4%
Efficiency (ROA)AMPY logoAMPY6.2% ROA vs BLNK's -66.7%, ROIC 12.3% vs -109.7%

EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

EVGOEVgo, Inc.
FY 2025
Charging Revenue Retail
50.0%$134M
Ancillary Revenue.
18.4%$49M
Charging Revenue Commercial
13.0%$35M
Charging Revenue OEM
9.8%$26M
Network Revenue OEM
5.0%$13M
Regulatory Credit Sales
3.8%$10M
CHPTChargePoint Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
56.3%$235M
License and Service
34.6%$144M
Product and Service, Other
9.1%$38M
BLNKBlink Charging Co.
FY 2024
Product
57.7%$82M
Service
15.1%$21M
Host Provider Fees
9.1%$13M
Network
6.2%$9M
Warranty
4.5%$6M
Depreciation and Amortization
4.4%$6M
Warranty And Repairs And Maintenance
1.8%$3M
Other (1)
1.1%$2M
AMPYAmplify Energy Corp.
FY 2025
Oil and Gas
97.2%$256M
Product and Service, Other
2.8%$7M
TPVGTriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

Segment breakdown not available.

EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLAMPYLAGGINGTPVG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — AMPY and TPVG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

EVGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $418M annually — 4.3x TPVG's $97M. TPVG is the more profitable business, keeping 50.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to BLNK's -118.7%. On growth, EVGO holds the edge at +45.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricEVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.AMPY logoAMPYAmplify Energy Co…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$418M$411M$106M$263M$97M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax-$58M-$180M-$115M$109M$76M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$51M-$220M-$126M$44M$49M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$165M-$67M-$47M-$13.5B$37M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+20.2%+30.5%+26.0%+93.2%+83.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue-27.2%-51.1%-119.5%+29.2%+77.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-12.1%-53.5%-118.7%+16.7%+50.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-39.5%-16.3%-44.5%-51.1%-58.7%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+45.5%+7.3%+11.7%-18.1%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-33.3%+28.8%+99.9%+8394.1%+2.1%
Evenly matched — AMPY and TPVG each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

AMPY leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

At 4.5x trailing earnings, TPVG trades at a 26% valuation discount to AMPY's 6.1x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, AMPY's 1.8x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TPVG's 8.9x.

MetricEVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.AMPY logoAMPYAmplify Energy Co…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Market CapShares × price$659M$137M$83M$255M$222M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$614M$267M$52M$197M$671M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.77x-0.67x-0.37x6.08x4.49x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.23.19x5.94x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate4.43x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple1.80x8.86x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.71x0.33x0.67x0.97x2.28x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.73x6.96x0.61x0.55x0.62x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF
AMPY leads this category, winning 2 of 5 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

AMPY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

TPVG delivers a 14.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-4 for CHPT. AMPY carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to CHPT's 12.75x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMPY scores 7/9 vs BLNK's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricEVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.AMPY logoAMPYAmplify Energy Co…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-13.3%-3.5%-131.9%+10.6%+14.0%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-5.5%-25.8%-66.7%+6.2%+6.2%
ROICReturn on invested capital-21.9%-83.8%-109.7%+12.3%+7.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-14.5%-41.6%-77.3%+12.6%+9.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–965375
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.28x12.75x0.09x0.01x1.33x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$44M$130M-$31M-$58M$449M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$151M$142M$42M$61M$20M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$107M$272M$11M$3M$469M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-25.87x-8.58x-9064.60x2.86x
AMPY leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

AMPY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in AMPY five years ago would be worth $22,042 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $137 for CHPT. Over the past 12 months, AMPY leads with a +140.8% total return vs CHPT's -45.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TPVG at -1.5% vs CHPT's -67.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricEVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.AMPY logoAMPYAmplify Energy Co…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-31.8%-10.1%-2.2%+35.2%-14.0%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-24.2%-45.4%+1.3%+140.8%+9.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-66.0%-96.4%-89.9%-12.4%-4.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-82.2%-98.6%-97.9%+120.4%-23.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-78.6%-96.8%-97.9%+1044.6%+87.5%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-30.2%-67.0%-53.4%-4.3%-1.5%
AMPY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

AMPY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

AMPY is the less volatile stock with a -0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BLNK's 2.96 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMPY currently trades 92.2% from its 52-week high vs BLNK's 27.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricEVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.AMPY logoAMPYAmplify Energy Co…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.04x2.61x2.96x-0.19x0.83x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$5.18$17.78$2.65$6.79$7.53
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.64$4.45$0.45$2.60$4.48
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+40.5%+35.6%+27.3%+92.2%+72.8%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10054.351.853.658.460.7
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded4.3M470K2.0M1.0M491K
AMPY leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

CHPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: EVGO as "Buy", CHPT as "Hold", AMPY as "Buy", TPVG as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 150.0% upside for EVGO (target: $5) vs 18.5% for CHPT (target: $8).

MetricEVGO logoEVGOEVgo, Inc.CHPT logoCHPTChargePoint Holdi…BLNK logoBLNKBlink Charging Co.AMPY logoAMPYAmplify Energy Co…TPVG logoTPVGTriplePoint Ventu…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyHoldBuyHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$5.25$7.50$10.25$8.95
# AnalystsCovering analysts1621512
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises100
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
CHPT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

AMPY leads in 4 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). CHPT leads in 1 (Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallAmplify Energy Corp. (AMPY)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

EVGO vs CHPT vs BLNK vs AMPY vs TPVG: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG a better buy right now?

For growth investors, EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) is the stronger pick with 49. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. (TPVG) offers the better valuation at 4. 5x trailing P/E (5. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EVgo, Inc. (EVGO) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?

On trailing P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the cheapest at 4. 5x versus Amplify Energy Corp. at 6. 1x. On forward P/E, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. is actually cheaper at 5. 9x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?

Over the past 5 years, Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) delivered a total return of +120. 4%, compared to -98. 6% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMPY returned +1045% versus BLNK's -97. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 19β versus Blink Charging Co. 's 2. 96β — meaning BLNK is approximately -1669% more volatile than AMPY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amplify Energy Corp. (AMPY) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 13% for ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVgo, Inc.

(EVGO) is pulling ahead at 49. 6% versus -11. 2% for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amplify Energy Corp. grew EPS 232. 3% year-over-year, compared to 24. 4% for EVgo, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVGO leads at 91. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?

TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 6% net margin versus -159. 2% for Blink Charging Co. — meaning it keeps 50. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TPVG leads at 77. 9% versus -160. 6% for BLNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMPY leads at 93. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.

(TPVG) trades at 5. 9x forward P/E versus 23. 2x for Amplify Energy Corp. — 17. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVGO: 150. 0% to $5. 25.

08

Which pays a better dividend — EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is EVGO or CHPT or BLNK or AMPY or TPVG better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Amplify Energy Corp.

(AMPY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 19), +1045% 10Y return). Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) carries a higher beta of 2. 96 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMPY: +1045%, BLNK: -97. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between EVGO and CHPT and BLNK and AMPY and TPVG?

These companies operate in different sectors (EVGO (Consumer Cyclical) and CHPT (Consumer Cyclical) and BLNK (Industrials) and AMPY (Energy) and TPVG (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EVGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; CHPT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BLNK is a small-cap quality compounder stock; AMPY is a small-cap deep-value stock; TPVG is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

EVGO

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 22%
  • Gross Margin > 12%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CHPT

Quality Business

  • Sector: Consumer Cyclical
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 18%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BLNK

Quality Business

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 15%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AMPY

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TPVG

High-Growth Quality Leader

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 18%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform EVGO and CHPT and BLNK and AMPY and TPVG on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(EVGO: 45.5% · CHPT: 7.3%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.