Industrial - Distribution
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
EVI vs POOL vs SITE vs WSO vs IBP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
Industrial - Distribution
Residential Construction
EVI vs POOL vs SITE vs WSO vs IBP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Industrial - Distribution | Residential Construction |
| Market Cap | $259M | $6.99B | $5.54B | $17.45B | $5.84B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $427M | $5.36B | $4.71B | $7.24B | $2.95B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $406M | $153M | $496M | $255M |
| Gross Margin | 30.3% | 29.7% | 34.9% | 28.4% | 33.9% |
| Operating Margin | 3.4% | 10.9% | 5.1% | 9.8% | 12.7% |
| Forward P/E | 31.3x | 17.0x | 27.9x | 33.3x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $65M | $349M | $980M | $479M | $1.05B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $9M | $105M | $191M | $433M | $322M |
EVI vs POOL vs SITE vs WSO vs IBP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI) | 100 | 102.0 | +2.0% |
| Pool Corporation (POOL) | 100 | 69.8 | -30.2% |
| SiteOne Landscape S… (SITE) | 100 | 113.8 | +13.8% |
| Watsco, Inc. (WSO) | 100 | 236.4 | +136.4% |
| Installed Building … (IBP) | 100 | 342.2 | +242.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: EVI vs POOL vs SITE vs WSO vs IBP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
EVI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure and valuation efficiency is your priority.
- Rev growth 10.3%, EPS growth 32.4%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.4%
- PEG 0.59 vs SITE's 6.72
- 10.3% revenue growth vs WSO's -5.0%
- PEG 0.59 vs 0.82
POOL ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 1.00, yield 2.6%
- Beta 1.00 vs EVI's 1.50, lower leverage
- 2.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs WSO's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
SITE lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
WSO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.10, Low D/E 14.9%, current ratio 4.12x
- Beta 1.10, yield 2.9%, current ratio 4.12x
IBP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.
- 6.5% 10Y total return vs EVI's 455.1%
- 8.6% margin vs EVI's 1.7%
- +34.0% vs POOL's -33.9%
- 12.2% ROA vs EVI's 2.8%, ROIC 20.7% vs 5.8%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 10.3% revenue growth vs WSO's -5.0% | |
| Value | PEG 0.59 vs 0.82 | |
| Quality / Margins | 8.6% margin vs EVI's 1.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.00 vs EVI's 1.50, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.6% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs WSO's 2.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +34.0% vs POOL's -33.9% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.2% ROA vs EVI's 2.8%, ROIC 20.7% vs 5.8% |
EVI vs POOL vs SITE vs WSO vs IBP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
EVI vs POOL vs SITE vs WSO vs IBP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
IBP leads in 2 of 6 categories
EVI leads 1 • POOL leads 0 • SITE leads 0 • WSO leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — EVI and IBP each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
WSO is the larger business by revenue, generating $7.2B annually — 17.0x EVI's $427M. IBP is the more profitable business, keeping 8.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to EVI's 1.7%. On growth, EVI holds the edge at +24.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $427M | $5.4B | $4.7B | $7.2B | $2.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $20M | $636M | $382M | $757M | $656M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $7M | $406M | $153M | $496M | $255M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $18M | $605M | $246M | $702M | $63M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +30.3% | +29.7% | +34.9% | +28.4% | +33.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +3.4% | +10.9% | +5.1% | +9.8% | +12.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +1.7% | +7.6% | +3.2% | +6.8% | +8.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +4.2% | +11.3% | +5.2% | +9.7% | +2.1% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +24.4% | +6.2% | +0.1% | +0.1% | -3.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +131.3% | +2.1% | +1.6% | -3.1% | -21.3% |
Valuation Metrics
EVI leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.6x trailing earnings, POOL trades at a 57% valuation discount to EVI's 41.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), EVI offers better value at 0.78x vs SITE's 8.94x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $259M | $7.0B | $5.5B | $17.5B | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $314M | $7.2B | $6.3B | $17.5B | $6.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 41.02x | 17.55x | 37.08x | 35.04x | 22.33x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.33x | 16.97x | 27.89x | 33.27x | 19.88x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.78x | 4.53x | 8.94x | 2.97x | 0.92x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.37x | 11.45x | 16.70x | 23.76x | 13.41x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.66x | 1.32x | 1.18x | 2.41x | 1.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.84x | 5.99x | 3.35x | 5.05x | 8.26x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 15.76x | 22.58x | 22.44x | 32.59x | 19.41x |
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
IBP delivers a 37.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $37 in annual profit, vs $5 for EVI. WSO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.15x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to IBP's 1.48x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SITE scores 8/9 vs WSO's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +4.9% | +32.2% | +9.1% | +15.3% | +37.5% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.8% | +11.3% | +4.6% | +10.8% | +12.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.8% | +22.3% | +7.3% | +16.6% | +20.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.3% | +22.0% | +9.6% | +19.0% | +22.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 6 | 8 | 5 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.45x | 0.29x | 0.58x | 0.15x | 1.48x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $56M | $244M | $789M | $46M | $731M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $9M | $105M | $191M | $433M | $322M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $65M | $349M | $980M | $479M | $1.1B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.96x | 12.20x | 6.79x | — | 9.47x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
IBP leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in IBP five years ago would be worth $18,064 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,771 for POOL. Over the past 12 months, IBP leads with a +34.0% total return vs POOL's -33.9%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors IBP at 25.6% vs POOL's -16.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -20.5% | -16.6% | -0.1% | +25.4% | -18.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +24.1% | -33.9% | +5.6% | -6.0% | +34.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +4.3% | -42.1% | -18.7% | +37.6% | +98.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -21.2% | -52.3% | -38.4% | +59.8% | +80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +455.1% | +145.0% | +368.6% | +281.5% | +650.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +1.4% | -16.6% | -6.7% | +11.2% | +25.6% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — POOL and WSO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
POOL is the less volatile stock with a 1.00 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than EVI's 1.50 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WSO currently trades 86.5% from its 52-week high vs POOL's 55.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.48x | 0.91x | 1.15x | 1.12x | 1.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $34.82 | $345.00 | $168.56 | $496.25 | $349.00 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $15.59 | $186.95 | $112.23 | $323.05 | $150.83 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +57.7% | +55.2% | +74.1% | +86.5% | +62.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.2 | 29.7 | 36.8 | 56.2 | 55.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 30K | 764K | 689K | 452K | 344K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — POOL and WSO each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: EVI as "Buy", POOL as "Buy", SITE as "Buy", WSO as "Hold", IBP as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 64.2% upside for EVI (target: $33) vs -6.9% for WSO (target: $400). For income investors, WSO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.91% vs IBP's 1.49%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $33.00 | $279.29 | $162.29 | $399.80 | $251.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 21 | 15 | 26 | 27 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.7% | +2.6% | — | +2.9% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 4 | 15 | 2 | 12 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.35 | $4.96 | — | $12.50 | $3.24 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +5.0% | +1.8% | +0.0% | +3.0% |
IBP leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). EVI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 3 tied.
EVI vs POOL vs SITE vs WSO vs IBP: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is EVI or POOL or SITE or WSO or IBP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, EVI Industries, Inc.
(EVI) is the stronger pick with 10. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 0% for Watsco, Inc. (WSO). Pool Corporation (POOL) offers the better valuation at 17. 6x trailing P/E (17. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — EVI or POOL or SITE or WSO or IBP?
On trailing P/E, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the cheapest at 17.
6x versus EVI Industries, Inc. at 41. 0x. On forward P/E, Pool Corporation is actually cheaper at 17. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: EVI Industries, Inc. wins at 0. 59x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 72x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — EVI or POOL or SITE or WSO or IBP?
Over the past 5 years, Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) delivered a total return of +80. 6%, compared to -52. 3% for Pool Corporation (POOL). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: IBP returned +660. 5% versus POOL's +142. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — EVI or POOL or SITE or WSO or IBP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Pool Corporation (POOL) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
91β versus EVI Industries, Inc. 's 1. 48β — meaning EVI is approximately 62% more volatile than POOL relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Watsco, Inc. (WSO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 15% versus 148% for Installed Building Products, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — EVI or POOL or SITE or WSO or IBP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), EVI Industries, Inc.
(EVI) is pulling ahead at 10. 3% versus -5. 0% for Watsco, Inc. (WSO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: EVI Industries, Inc. grew EPS 32. 4% year-over-year, compared to -7. 9% for Watsco, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, EVI leads at 13. 4% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — EVI or POOL or SITE or WSO or IBP?
Installed Building Products, Inc.
(IBP) is the more profitable company, earning 8. 9% net margin versus 1. 9% for EVI Industries, Inc. — meaning it keeps 8. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: IBP leads at 13. 0% versus 3. 5% for EVI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SITE leads at 34. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is EVI or POOL or SITE or WSO or IBP more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, EVI Industries, Inc. (EVI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 59x versus SiteOne Landscape Supply, Inc. 's 6. 72x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Pool Corporation (POOL) trades at 17. 0x forward P/E versus 33. 3x for Watsco, Inc. — 16. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EVI: 64. 2% to $33. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — EVI or POOL or SITE or WSO or IBP?
In this comparison, WSO (2.
9% yield), POOL (2. 6% yield), EVI (1. 7% yield), IBP (1. 5% yield) pay a dividend. SITE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is EVI or POOL or SITE or WSO or IBP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Pool Corporation (POOL) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
91), 2. 6% yield, +142. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (POOL: +142. 2%, SITE: +353. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between EVI and POOL and SITE and WSO and IBP?
These companies operate in different sectors (EVI (Industrials) and POOL (Industrials) and SITE (Industrials) and WSO (Industrials) and IBP (Consumer Cyclical)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: EVI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; POOL is a small-cap deep-value stock; SITE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WSO is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; IBP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. EVI, POOL, WSO, IBP pay a dividend while SITE does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.