EXOD vs SMLR vs MSTR vs CLSK vs MARA

For growth investors, CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is the stronger pick with 102. 2% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -17. 4% for Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR). Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) offers the better valuation at 4. 0x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Exodus Movement, Inc. (EXOD) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Semler Scientific, Inc.

(SMLR) is the cheapest at 4. 0x versus CleanSpark, Inc. at 12. 5x. On forward P/E, Strategy Inc is actually cheaper at 2. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Strategy Inc (MSTR) delivered a total return of +189.

8%, compared to -81. 8% for Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: SMLR returned +1110% versus CLSK's -84. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Semler Scientific, Inc.

(SMLR) is the lower-risk stock at 2. 48β versus CleanSpark, Inc. 's 3. 39β — meaning CLSK is approximately 37% more volatile than SMLR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 105% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), CleanSpark, Inc.

(CLSK) is pulling ahead at 102. 2% versus -17. 4% for Semler Scientific, Inc. (SMLR). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: CleanSpark, Inc. grew EPS 262. 3% year-over-year, compared to -314. 5% for Marathon Digital Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, CLSK leads at 79. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Semler Scientific, Inc.

(SMLR) is the more profitable company, earning 72. 7% net margin versus -844. 8% for Strategy Inc — meaning it keeps 72. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CLSK leads at 41. 6% versus -1140. 8% for MSTR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SMLR leads at 91. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Strategy Inc (MSTR) trades at 2.

4x forward P/E versus 1516. 0x for Exodus Movement, Inc. — 1513. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for EXOD: 190. 2% to $22. 00.

In this comparison, MSTR (0.

7% yield), CLSK (0. 2% yield) pay a dividend. EXOD, SMLR, MARA do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Strategy Inc (MSTR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.

7% yield, +855. 6% 10Y return). CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) carries a higher beta of 3. 39 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (MSTR: +855. 6%, CLSK: -84. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

These companies operate in different sectors (EXOD (Technology) and SMLR (Healthcare) and MSTR (Technology) and CLSK (Technology) and MARA (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: EXOD is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SMLR is a small-cap deep-value stock; MSTR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; CLSK is a small-cap high-growth stock; MARA is a small-cap high-growth stock. MSTR pays a dividend while EXOD, SMLR, CLSK, MARA do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.