EXPD vs FDX

For growth investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the stronger pick with 4. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 0. 3% for FedEx Corporation (FDX). FedEx Corporation (FDX) offers the better valuation at 22. 4x trailing P/E (19. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FedEx Corporation (FDX) a "Buy" — based on 49 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, FedEx Corporation (FDX) is the cheapest at 22.

4x versus Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. at 25. 4x. On forward P/E, FedEx Corporation is actually cheaper at 19. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: FedEx Corporation wins at 0. 68x versus Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. 's 3. 17x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) delivered a total return of +36. 7%, compared to +29. 0% for FedEx Corporation (FDX). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: EXPD returned +236. 2% versus FDX's +156. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 75β versus FedEx Corporation's 1. 03β — meaning FDX is approximately 36% more volatile than EXPD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 24% versus 133% for FedEx Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is pulling ahead at 4. 4% versus 0. 3% for FedEx Corporation (FDX). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. grew EPS 4. 0% year-over-year, compared to -2. 3% for FedEx Corporation. Over a 3-year CAGR, FDX leads at -2. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the more profitable company, earning 7. 4% net margin versus 4. 7% for FedEx Corporation — meaning it keeps 7. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPD leads at 9. 5% versus 6. 9% for FDX. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FDX leads at 21. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, FedEx Corporation (FDX) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 68x versus Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. 's 3. 17x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, FedEx Corporation (FDX) trades at 19. 1x forward P/E versus 25. 0x for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FDX: -3. 4% to $364. 19.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

FedEx Corporation (FDX) offers the highest yield at 1. 5%, versus 1. 0% for Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD).

For long-horizon retirement investors, Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.

(EXPD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 75), 1. 0% yield, +236. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPD: +236. 2%, FDX: +156. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.