EXPE vs MMYT

For growth investors, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the stronger pick with 25.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 7. 6% for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE). Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) offers the better valuation at 25. 8x trailing P/E (13. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) a "Buy" — based on 11 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) is the cheapest at 25. 8x versus MakeMyTrip Limited at 60. 9x. On forward P/E, Expedia Group, Inc. is actually cheaper at 13. 0x.

Over the past 5 years, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) delivered a total return of +97.

0%, compared to +46. 9% for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MMYT returned +190. 1% versus EXPE's +130. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

17β versus Expedia Group, Inc. 's 1. 47β — meaning EXPE is approximately 26% more volatile than MMYT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 20% versus 3% for Expedia Group, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is pulling ahead at 25.

0% versus 7. 6% for Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Expedia Group, Inc. grew EPS 9. 6% year-over-year, compared to -54. 6% for MakeMyTrip Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, MMYT leads at 47. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

MakeMyTrip Limited (MMYT) is the more profitable company, earning 9.

7% net margin versus 8. 8% for Expedia Group, Inc. — meaning it keeps 9. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EXPE leads at 13. 4% versus 12. 3% for MMYT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EXPE leads at 84. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

On forward earnings alone, Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) trades at 13. 0x forward P/E versus 73. 2x for MakeMyTrip Limited — 60. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MMYT: 80. 2% to $91. 00.

In this comparison, EXPE (0.

6% yield) pays a dividend. MMYT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, Expedia Group, Inc.

(EXPE) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0. 6% yield, +130. 6% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (EXPE: +130. 6%, MMYT: +190. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: EXPE is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; MMYT is a small-cap high-growth stock. EXPE pays a dividend while MMYT does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.