Specialty Business Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FA vs TRU
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Consulting Services
FA vs TRU — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Specialty Business Services | Consulting Services |
| Market Cap | $2.24B | $13.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.57B | $4.73B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-35M | $705M |
| Gross Margin | — | 52.7% |
| Operating Margin | 8.4% | 18.1% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 14.8x |
| Total Debt | $9M | $5.16B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $240M | $854M |
FA vs TRU — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 21 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Advantage Cor… (FA) | 100 | 64.6 | -35.4% |
| TransUnion (TRU) | 100 | 64.4 | -35.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FA vs TRU
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.15
- Rev growth 83.0%, EPS growth 73.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.15, Low D/E 0.7%, current ratio 2.44x
TRU is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 142.8% 10Y total return vs FA's -27.1%
- 14.9% margin vs FA's -2.2%
- 0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 83.0% revenue growth vs TRU's 9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 14.8x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 14.9% margin vs FA's -2.2% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.15 vs TRU's 1.36, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 0.7% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -13.3% vs TRU's -15.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.2% ROA vs FA's -0.9%, ROIC 7.3% vs 4.5% |
FA vs TRU — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FA vs TRU — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRU leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TRU is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.7B annually — 3.0x FA's $1.6B. TRU is the more profitable business, keeping 14.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FA's -2.2%. On growth, FA holds the edge at +36.8% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.6B | $4.7B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $381M | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$35M | $705M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $191M | $697M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +52.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +8.4% | +18.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +14.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.1% | +14.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +36.8% | +13.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +103.8% | +172.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FA leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FA's 5.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than TRU's 12.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.2B | $13.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.0B | $17.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -64.27x | 30.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.71x | 14.80x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 5.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 5.27x | 12.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.42x | 2.98x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.69x | 3.06x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 11.47x | 20.62x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TRU leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
TRU delivers a 15.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $-3 for FA. FA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRU's 1.13x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), TRU scores 8/9 vs FA's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.7% | +15.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.9% | +6.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +7.3% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +3.6% | +8.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.01x | 1.13x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$231M | $4.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $240M | $854M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $5.2B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.79x | 3.61x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FA five years ago would be worth $7,286 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $6,930 for TRU. Over the past 12 months, FA leads with a -13.3% total return vs TRU's -15.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FA at 4.1% vs TRU's 3.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.8% | -15.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -13.3% | -15.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +12.8% | +10.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.1% | -30.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -27.1% | +142.8% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +4.1% | +3.4% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FA and TRU each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FA is the less volatile stock with a 1.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TRU's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRU currently trades 71.1% from its 52-week high vs FA's 67.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.15x | 1.36x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $19.01 | $99.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $8.82 | $65.23 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +67.6% | +71.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.6 | 39.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.3M |
Analyst Outlook
TRU leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FA as "Buy" and TRU as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 34.2% upside for TRU (target: $95) vs 16.7% for FA (target: $15). TRU is the only dividend payer here at 0.65% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.00 | $94.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 12 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $0.46 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.5% |
TRU leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FA leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FA vs TRU: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FA or TRU a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Advantage Corporation (FA) is the stronger pick with 83.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 4% for TransUnion (TRU). TransUnion (TRU) offers the better valuation at 30. 5x trailing P/E (14. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Advantage Corporation (FA) a "Buy" — based on 12 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FA or TRU?
On forward P/E, First Advantage Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.
7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FA or TRU?
Over the past 5 years, First Advantage Corporation (FA) delivered a total return of -27.
1%, compared to -30. 7% for TransUnion (TRU). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: TRU returned +142. 8% versus FA's -27. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FA or TRU?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Advantage Corporation (FA) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
15β versus TransUnion's 1. 36β — meaning TRU is approximately 19% more volatile than FA relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Advantage Corporation (FA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 113% for TransUnion — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FA or TRU?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Advantage Corporation (FA) is pulling ahead at 83.
0% versus 9. 4% for TransUnion (TRU). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Advantage Corporation grew EPS 73. 0% year-over-year, compared to 60. 0% for TransUnion. Over a 3-year CAGR, FA leads at 24. 8% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FA or TRU?
TransUnion (TRU) is the more profitable company, earning 10.
0% net margin versus -2. 2% for First Advantage Corporation — meaning it keeps 10. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRU leads at 18. 7% versus 8. 4% for FA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TRU leads at 59. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FA or TRU more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, First Advantage Corporation (FA) trades at 10.
7x forward P/E versus 14. 8x for TransUnion — 4. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TRU: 34. 2% to $94. 88.
08Which pays a better dividend — FA or TRU?
In this comparison, TRU (0.
7% yield) pays a dividend. FA does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FA or TRU better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, TransUnion (TRU) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (0.
7% yield, +142. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (TRU: +142. 8%, FA: -27. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FA and TRU?
Both stocks operate in the Industrials sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FA is a small-cap high-growth stock; TRU is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. TRU pays a dividend while FA does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.