Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FANG vs MTDR vs CTRA vs SM vs PARR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Exploration & Production
Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing
FANG vs MTDR vs CTRA vs SM vs PARR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Exploration & Production | Oil & Gas Refining & Marketing |
| Market Cap | $53.57B | $6.90B | $24.72B | $3.35B | $3.08B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $15.19B | $3.36B | $6.48B | $3.79B | $7.54B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $403M | $483M | $1.67B | $131M | $454M |
| Gross Margin | 41.8% | 102.0% | 40.6% | 45.1% | 19.5% |
| Operating Margin | 22.1% | 26.3% | 30.7% | 6.5% | 8.2% |
| Forward P/E | 10.7x | 7.7x | 11.5x | 4.4x | 5.6x |
| Total Debt | $14.49B | $3.55B | $4.01B | $2.30B | $1.39B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $106M | $79M | $119M | $368M | $164M |
FANG vs MTDR vs CTRA vs SM vs PARR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Diamondback Energy,… (FANG) | 100 | 443.2 | +343.2% |
| Matador Resources C… (MTDR) | 100 | 809.2 | +709.2% |
| Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) | 100 | 180.9 | +80.9% |
| SM Energy Company (SM) | 100 | 836.4 | +736.4% |
| Par Pacific Holding… (PARR) | 100 | 692.9 | +592.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FANG vs MTDR vs CTRA vs SM vs PARR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FANG ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 36.3%, EPS growth -63.1%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.2%
- 36.3% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6%
Among these 5 stocks, MTDR doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
CTRA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 0.03, yield 2.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.03, Low D/E 27.0%, current ratio 1.19x
- Beta 0.03, yield 2.8%, current ratio 1.19x
- 25.7% margin vs FANG's 2.7%
SM is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (4.4x vs 5.6x)
PARR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if long-term compounding is your priority.
- 255.3% 10Y total return vs FANG's 162.5%
- +276.6% vs SM's +41.1%
- 11.2% ROA vs FANG's 0.6%, ROIC 15.1% vs 6.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 36.3% revenue growth vs CTRA's -49.6% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (4.4x vs 5.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 25.7% margin vs FANG's 2.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.03 vs SM's 0.16, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 2.8% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs MTDR's 2.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +276.6% vs SM's +41.1% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 11.2% ROA vs FANG's 0.6%, ROIC 15.1% vs 6.7% |
FANG vs MTDR vs CTRA vs SM vs PARR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FANG vs MTDR vs CTRA vs SM vs PARR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PARR leads in 2 of 6 categories
CTRA leads 1 • SM leads 1 • FANG leads 0 • MTDR leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
CTRA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FANG is the larger business by revenue, generating $15.2B annually — 4.5x MTDR's $3.4B. CTRA is the more profitable business, keeping 25.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FANG's 2.7%. On growth, SM holds the edge at +76.2% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $15.2B | $3.4B | $6.5B | $3.8B | $7.5B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $8.6B | $2.1B | $4.4B | $1.6B | $760M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $403M | $483M | $1.7B | $131M | $454M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1.6B | $518M | $2.6B | -$226M | $282M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +41.8% | +102.0% | +40.6% | +45.1% | +19.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +22.1% | +26.3% | +30.7% | +6.5% | +8.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +2.7% | +14.4% | +25.7% | +3.4% | +6.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +10.5% | +15.4% | +40.8% | -5.9% | +3.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +5.2% | -33.2% | -43.3% | +76.2% | +4.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -98.3% | -115.1% | -10.3% | -2.1% | +2.9% |
Valuation Metrics
SM leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 5.2x trailing earnings, SM trades at a 84% valuation discount to FANG's 33.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, SM's 2.6x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FANG's 6.8x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $53.6B | $6.9B | $24.7B | $3.3B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $68.0B | $10.4B | $28.6B | $5.3B | $4.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 33.24x | 9.12x | 14.47x | 5.16x | 8.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 10.68x | 7.72x | 11.54x | 4.42x | 5.62x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 0.41x | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 6.83x | 4.34x | 5.93x | 2.60x | 6.30x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.57x | 1.89x | 8.98x | 1.06x | 0.41x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.28x | 1.15x | 1.67x | 0.70x | 2.04x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 10.23x | 28.57x | 15.13x | 5.84x | 10.39x |
Profitability & Efficiency
PARR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
PARR delivers a 32.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $32 in annual profit, vs $1 for FANG. CTRA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.27x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PARR's 0.90x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), SM scores 7/9 vs MTDR's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +0.9% | +8.2% | +11.3% | +2.5% | +32.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.6% | +4.1% | +6.9% | +1.1% | +11.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.7% | +10.5% | +10.9% | +8.9% | +15.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +7.6% | +11.5% | +11.3% | +10.4% | +18.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.34x | 0.59x | 0.27x | 0.48x | 0.90x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $14.4B | $3.5B | $3.9B | $1.9B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $106M | $79M | $119M | $368M | $164M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $14.5B | $3.5B | $4.0B | $2.3B | $1.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.66x | 7.88x | 8.88x | 1.37x | 14.33x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PARR leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PARR five years ago would be worth $42,550 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $17,892 for SM. Over the past 12 months, PARR leads with a +276.6% total return vs SM's +41.1%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PARR at 43.8% vs SM's 5.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +25.7% | +29.0% | +23.2% | +53.3% | +73.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +50.1% | +42.2% | +47.9% | +41.1% | +276.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +57.5% | +29.9% | +41.2% | +18.7% | +197.6% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +163.7% | +105.5% | +125.2% | +78.9% | +325.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +162.5% | +201.8% | +68.7% | +132.6% | +255.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +16.3% | +9.1% | +12.2% | +5.9% | +43.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FANG and PARR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
PARR is the less volatile stock with a -0.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SM's 0.16 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FANG currently trades 88.8% from its 52-week high vs MTDR's 83.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.09x | 0.06x | 0.03x | 0.16x | -0.01x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $214.51 | $66.84 | $36.88 | $33.25 | $70.39 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $127.75 | $37.14 | $22.33 | $17.45 | $14.18 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.8% | +83.1% | +88.3% | +87.5% | +88.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.7 | 43.6 | 62.8 | 47.4 | 49.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 1.8M | 10.2M | 5.9M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — MTDR and CTRA each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FANG as "Buy", MTDR as "Buy", CTRA as "Buy", SM as "Buy", PARR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.9% upside for MTDR (target: $68) vs -1.0% for PARR (target: $62). For income investors, CTRA offers the higher dividend yield at 2.75% vs FANG's 2.10%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $201.27 | $68.29 | $34.00 | $29.00 | $61.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 51 | 42 | 55 | 54 | 17 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.4% | +2.8% | +2.7% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $4.00 | $1.31 | $0.90 | $0.80 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.8% | +0.8% | +0.6% | +0.4% | +4.1% |
PARR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). CTRA leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 2 tied.
FANG vs MTDR vs CTRA vs SM vs PARR: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FANG or MTDR or CTRA or SM or PARR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is the stronger pick with 36. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). SM Energy Company (SM) offers the better valuation at 5. 2x trailing P/E (4. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) a "Buy" — based on 51 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FANG or MTDR or CTRA or SM or PARR?
On trailing P/E, SM Energy Company (SM) is the cheapest at 5.
2x versus Diamondback Energy, Inc. at 33. 2x. On forward P/E, SM Energy Company is actually cheaper at 4. 4x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FANG or MTDR or CTRA or SM or PARR?
Over the past 5 years, Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
(PARR) delivered a total return of +325. 5%, compared to +78. 9% for SM Energy Company (SM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PARR returned +255. 3% versus CTRA's +68. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FANG or MTDR or CTRA or SM or PARR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Par Pacific Holdings, Inc.
(PARR) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 01β versus SM Energy Company's 0. 16β — meaning SM is approximately -1948% more volatile than PARR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 27% versus 90% for Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FANG or MTDR or CTRA or SM or PARR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Diamondback Energy, Inc.
(FANG) is pulling ahead at 36. 3% versus -49. 6% for Coterra Energy Inc. (CTRA). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 1314% year-over-year, compared to -63. 1% for Diamondback Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FANG leads at 16. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FANG or MTDR or CTRA or SM or PARR?
Coterra Energy Inc.
(CTRA) is the more profitable company, earning 62. 4% net margin versus 4. 9% for Par Pacific Holdings, Inc. — meaning it keeps 62. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CTRA leads at 89. 1% versus 7. 2% for PARR. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — CTRA leads at 60. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FANG or MTDR or CTRA or SM or PARR more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, SM Energy Company (SM) trades at 4.
4x forward P/E versus 11. 5x for Coterra Energy Inc. — 7. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for MTDR: 22. 9% to $68. 29.
08Which pays a better dividend — FANG or MTDR or CTRA or SM or PARR?
In this comparison, CTRA (2.
8% yield), SM (2. 7% yield), MTDR (2. 4% yield), FANG (2. 1% yield) pay a dividend. PARR does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FANG or MTDR or CTRA or SM or PARR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Matador Resources Company (MTDR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
06), 2. 4% yield, +201. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MTDR: +201. 8%, PARR: +255. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FANG and MTDR and CTRA and SM and PARR?
Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FANG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; MTDR is a small-cap deep-value stock; CTRA is a mid-cap deep-value stock; SM is a small-cap high-growth stock; PARR is a small-cap deep-value stock. FANG, MTDR, CTRA, SM pay a dividend while PARR does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.