Software - Infrastructure
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FATN vs NTCT vs DDOG vs FTNT vs PANW
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Application
Software - Infrastructure
Software - Infrastructure
FATN vs NTCT vs DDOG vs FTNT vs PANW — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Application | Software - Infrastructure | Software - Infrastructure |
| Market Cap | $85M | $2.91B | $82.47B | $105.84B | $181.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $859M | $3.67B | $7.11B | $10.61B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $5M | $96M | $136M | $1.95B | $843M |
| Gross Margin | 87.2% | 78.1% | 79.9% | 80.7% | 71.9% |
| Operating Margin | 18.7% | 12.8% | -0.7% | 31.1% | 9.6% |
| Forward P/E | 20.8x | 16.8x | 95.6x | 45.4x | 70.6x |
| Total Debt | $6M | $40M | $1.54B | $996M | $338M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $586M | $401M | $2.50B | $2.27B |
FATN vs NTCT vs DDOG vs FTNT vs PANW — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 25 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FatPipe, Inc. Commo… (FATN) | 100 | Infinity | +Infinity% |
| NetScout Systems, I… (NTCT) | 100 | 193.5 | +93.5% |
| Datadog, Inc. (DDOG) | 100 | 233.5 | +133.5% |
| Fortinet, Inc. (FTNT) | 100 | 148.6 | +48.6% |
| Palo Alto Networks,… (PANW) | 100 | 156.0 | +56.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FATN vs NTCT vs DDOG vs FTNT vs PANW
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FATN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
NTCT ranks third and is worth considering specifically for sleep-well-at-night and valuation efficiency.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.07, Low D/E 2.4%, current ratio 1.85x
- PEG 0.44 vs FTNT's 1.37
- Lower P/E (16.8x vs 70.6x)
DDOG is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if growth exposure is your priority.
- Rev growth 27.7%, EPS growth -41.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 26.9%
- 27.7% revenue growth vs NTCT's 4.5%
- +91.2% vs FATN's -24.3%
FTNT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 1.03
- 19.6% 10Y total return vs PANW's 10.7%
- Beta 1.03, current ratio 1.17x
- 27.5% margin vs DDOG's 3.7%
Among these 5 stocks, PANW doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.7% revenue growth vs NTCT's 4.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (16.8x vs 70.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 27.5% margin vs DDOG's 3.7% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.03 vs FATN's 2.17 | |
| Dividends | Tie | None of these 5 stocks pay a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +91.2% vs FATN's -24.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 19.4% ROA vs DDOG's 2.1% |
FATN vs NTCT vs DDOG vs FTNT vs PANW — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FATN vs NTCT vs DDOG vs FTNT vs PANW — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FTNT leads in 2 of 6 categories
NTCT leads 1 • DDOG leads 1 • FATN leads 0 • PANW leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FATN and FTNT each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PANW is the larger business by revenue, generating $10.6B annually — 552.2x FATN's $19M. FTNT is the more profitable business, keeping 27.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to DDOG's 3.7%. On growth, FATN holds the edge at +129.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $859M | $3.7B | $7.1B | $10.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $169M | $73M | $2.5B | $1.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $5M | $96M | $136M | $2.0B | $843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$788,908 | $285M | $1.1B | $2.4B | $4.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +87.2% | +78.1% | +79.9% | +80.7% | +71.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +18.7% | +12.8% | -0.7% | +31.1% | +9.6% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +25.9% | +11.1% | +3.7% | +27.5% | +7.9% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -4.1% | +33.2% | +29.4% | +34.3% | +40.5% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +129.5% | -1.0% | +32.2% | +20.1% | +31.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | 0.0% | +120.9% | +28.6% | -175.7% |
Valuation Metrics
NTCT leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 17.4x trailing earnings, FATN trades at a 98% valuation discount to DDOG's 772.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NTCT offers better value at 0.82x vs FTNT's 1.77x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $85M | $2.9B | $82.5B | $105.8B | $181.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $86M | $2.4B | $83.6B | $104.3B | $179.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 17.40x | 31.28x | 772.27x | 58.86x | 166.40x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 20.76x | 16.85x | 95.56x | 45.41x | 70.65x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 0.82x | — | 1.77x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 21.70x | 14.03x | 1069.69x | 46.71x | 113.17x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.45x | 3.38x | 24.06x | 15.57x | 19.68x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.38x | 1.77x | 22.56x | 86.46x | 24.14x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 10.18x | 82.42x | 47.55x | 52.29x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FTNT leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FTNT delivers a 155.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $156 in annual profit, vs $4 for DDOG. NTCT carries lower financial leverage with a 0.02x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FTNT's 0.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), NTCT scores 7/9 vs PANW's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +22.7% | +6.0% | +3.8% | +155.7% | +6.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +15.2% | +4.2% | +2.1% | +19.4% | +2.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +11.9% | +7.3% | -0.8% | — | +17.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +13.8% | +6.1% | -1.0% | +37.7% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.02x | 0.41x | 0.81x | 0.04x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $493,351 | -$547M | $1.1B | -$1.5B | -$1.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $586M | $401M | $2.5B | $2.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $6M | $40M | $1.5B | $996M | $338M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 7.75x | 67.81x | 4.46x | 121.54x | 3119.75x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
DDOG leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PANW five years ago would be worth $45,210 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,336 for NTCT. Over the past 12 months, DDOG leads with a +91.2% total return vs FATN's -24.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors DDOG at 34.1% vs NTCT's 10.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +183.3% | +51.4% | +73.2% | +83.7% | +48.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -24.3% | +70.3% | +91.2% | +40.1% | +35.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +34.9% | +141.3% | +107.3% | +139.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +33.4% | +150.5% | +214.6% | +352.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +64.2% | +517.0% | +1955.2% | +1066.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | +10.5% | +34.1% | +27.5% | +33.7% |
Risk & Volatility
FTNT leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FTNT is the less volatile stock with a 1.03 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATN's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FTNT currently trades 95.3% from its 52-week high vs FATN's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 1.07x | 1.32x | 1.03x | 1.08x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $10.90 | $43.80 | $278.70 | $150.05 | $302.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.31 | $20.39 | $98.01 | $70.12 | $139.57 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +55.9% | +92.8% | +83.1% | +95.3% | +87.9% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56.4 | 56.3 | 61.1 | 73.0 | 64.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.4M | 549K | 5.8M | 5.8M | 8.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FATN as "Buy", NTCT as "Hold", DDOG as "Buy", FTNT as "Hold", PANW as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 22.0% upside for PANW (target: $325) vs -32.2% for FTNT (target: $97).
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $38.00 | $209.58 | $97.05 | $324.79 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 1 | 21 | 47 | 68 | 88 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | — | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.6% | 0.0% | +2.2% | 0.0% |
FTNT leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Risk & Volatility). NTCT leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
FATN vs NTCT vs DDOG vs FTNT vs PANW: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FATN or NTCT or DDOG or FTNT or PANW a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is the stronger pick with 27. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 5% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) offers the better valuation at 17. 4x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FATN or NTCT or DDOG or FTNT or PANW?
On trailing P/E, FatPipe, Inc.
Common Stock (FATN) is the cheapest at 17. 4x versus Datadog, Inc. at 772. 3x. On forward P/E, NetScout Systems, Inc. is actually cheaper at 16. 8x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NetScout Systems, Inc. wins at 0. 44x versus Fortinet, Inc. 's 1. 37x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FATN or NTCT or DDOG or FTNT or PANW?
Over the past 5 years, Palo Alto Networks, Inc.
(PANW) delivered a total return of +352. 1%, compared to +33. 4% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FTNT returned +1955% versus NTCT's +64. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FATN or NTCT or DDOG or FTNT or PANW?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fortinet, Inc.
(FTNT) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 03β versus FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 17β — meaning FATN is approximately 110% more volatile than FTNT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 2% versus 81% for Fortinet, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FATN or NTCT or DDOG or FTNT or PANW?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Datadog, Inc.
(DDOG) is pulling ahead at 27. 7% versus 4. 5% for NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to -56. 0% for Palo Alto Networks, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, DDOG leads at 26. 9% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FATN or NTCT or DDOG or FTNT or PANW?
Fortinet, Inc.
(FTNT) is the more profitable company, earning 27. 3% net margin versus 3. 1% for Datadog, Inc. — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FTNT leads at 30. 6% versus -1. 3% for DDOG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FTNT leads at 80. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FATN or NTCT or DDOG or FTNT or PANW more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 44x versus Fortinet, Inc. 's 1. 37x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, NetScout Systems, Inc. (NTCT) trades at 16. 8x forward P/E versus 95. 6x for Datadog, Inc. — 78. 7x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PANW: 22. 0% to $324. 79.
08Which pays a better dividend — FATN or NTCT or DDOG or FTNT or PANW?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
09Is FATN or NTCT or DDOG or FTNT or PANW better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Fortinet, Inc.
(FTNT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +1955% 10Y return). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FATN and NTCT and DDOG and FTNT and PANW?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FATN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NTCT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DDOG is a mid-cap high-growth stock; FTNT is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; PANW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.