Holding +1.7% · day 12
44 stocks · 5 setups today · as of Nov 6, 2026
Each stock once, in its most actionable state, ranked as on the breakout page. Chart data is 15-minute delayed; setups update after the close. For information only, not a recommendation.
| Stock | Industry | Tier | Watchlist | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
 NTSKNetskope, Inc. Class A Common Stock | Holding +1.7% · day 12 | -1.71% | $21.30 | 97 | $8.6B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 VRNSVaronis Systems, Inc. | Near pivot -3.0% | +0.14% | $48.80 | 95 | $5.61B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 CSCOCisco Systems, Inc. | — | -1.95% | $93.85 | 54 | $369.9B | Networking & Telecom Equipment | Major | |
 CRWDCrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. | — | -0.14% | $216.90 | 95 | $220.86B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 PANWPalo Alto Networks, Inc. | — | -0.26% | $313.84 | 93 | $213.89B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 NETCloudflare, Inc. | — | +9.62% | $268.75 | 86 | $95.39B | Cloud & Data Centers | Major | |
 FTNTFortinet, Inc. | — | -3.00% | $118.84 | 70 | $87.07B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 ZSZscaler, Inc. | — | -3.05% | $197.66 | 92 | $31.96B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 OKTAOkta, Inc. | — | -1.44% | $168.69 | 96 | $28.02B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 RBRKRubrik, Inc. | — | +0.01% | $105.75 | 96 | $21.77B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 GENGen Digital Inc. | — | -2.65% | $29.79 | 87 | $17.83B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 FFIVF5, Inc. | — | -0.29% | $310.84 | 45 | $17.54B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 CHKPCheck Point Software Technologies Ltd. | — | -2.71% | $144.17 | 76 | $14.72B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 AKAMAkamai Technologies, Inc. | — | +6.74% | $83.09 | 32 | $12.08B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 SAILSailPoint, Inc. | — | +4.46% | $19.21 | 90 | $10.9B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 ESTCElastic N.V. | — | +2.23% | $86.08 | 93 | $8.91B | Data & Analytics Software | Major | |
 SSentinelOne, Inc. | — | +1.63% | $21.77 | 92 | $7.33B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 QLYSQualys, Inc. | — | -4.70% | $190.24 | 96 | $6.7B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 CVLTCommvault Systems, Inc. | — | +0.47% | $158.36 | 94 | $6.56B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 BBBlackBerry Limited | — | +4.42% | $8.74 | 95 | $5.12B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 TENBTenable Holdings, Inc. | — | -4.60% | $42.13 | 96 | $4.65B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 FSLYFastly, Inc. | — | +3.06% | $15.85 | 29 | $2.48B | Cloud & Data Centers | Major | |
 NTCTNetScout Systems, Inc. | — | -1.01% | $31.51 | 45 | $2.29B | DevOps & Observability | Major | |
 ATENA10 Networks, Inc. | — | +9.56% | $24.76 | 59 | $1.78B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 RDWRRadware Ltd. | — | -1.13% | $29.84 | 80 | $1.29B | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 RPDRapid7, Inc. | — | -4.92% | $14.68 | 97 | $981M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 NABLN-able, Inc. | — | -1.63% | $4.84 | 81 | $912M | DevOps & Observability | Major | |
 OSPNOneSpan Inc. | — | -1.42% | $21.59 | 96 | $800M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 MITKMitek Systems, Inc. | — | +1.83% | $17.24 | 69 | $779M | Financial Software | Major | |
 ALLTAllot Ltd. | — | +4.65% | $8.56 | 84 | $419M | Cybersecurity | Major | |
 TLSTelos Corporation | — | +0.84% | $4.82 | 74 | $361M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 ARQQArqit Quantum Inc. | — | +29.97% | $15.96 | 39 | $250M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 LAESSEALSQ Corp | — | +7.32% | $1.32 | 10 | $188M | Semiconductors | Major | |
 WKEYWISeKey International Holding AG | — | -1.16% | $8.53 | 91 | $53M | Semiconductors | Major | |
 IDNIntellicheck, Inc. | — | +1.49% | $2.04 | 12 | $41M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 VHCVirnetX Holding Corp | — | +2.86% | $9.71 | 28 | $41M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 AWREAware, Inc. | — | +1.04% | $0.97 | 27 | $21M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 INTZIntrusion Inc. | — | +4.51% | $0.65 | 30 | $15M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 IDAIT Stamp Inc. | — | +3.67% | $2.26 | 38 | $12M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 CISOCISO Global Inc. | — | +12.09% | $0.18 | 20 | $8M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 AUIDauthID Inc. | — | -12.38% | $0.19 | 4 | $3M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 CYCUCycurion, Inc. Common Stock | — | +6.70% | $2.39 | 10 | $3M | Government IT Services | Major | |
 BKYIBIO-key International, Inc. | — | +0.42% | $2.38 | 17 | $3M | Cybersecurity | Core | |
 HUBCHUB Cyber Security Ltd. | — | -11.27% | $0.09 | 0 | $159081 | Cybersecurity | Core |
Cybersecurity Stocks -9.9%SPY -4.9%
Equal-weight return of the theme's stocks from the range start, against SPY. Daily market data.
| Window | Theme | SPY | vs SPY |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today | +1.3% | +0.3% | +1.0% |
| 5D | -4.2% | -2.2% | -2.0% |
| 1M | -11.2% | -5.4% | -5.8% |
| 3M | -9.9% | -4.9% | -5.0% |
| 6M | +14.7% | +0.5% | +14.2% |
| YTD | +6.6% | +7.8% | -1.3% |
| 1Y | -0.1% | +9.6% | -9.7% |
Network security, endpoint detection, identity management, and cloud security — the companies defending the digital perimeter.
Cybersecurity stocks screened across network security, endpoint detection, identity management, and cloud security platforms with daily updated market data, valuation metrics and performance tracking.
44 US-listed stocks, placed in this theme by our own classification of each company's business. Setups come from the same chart-pattern engine as the breakout page and update after the close.
This page covers the full security stack, not just firewall companies.
Cybersecurity investing spans network access, endpoint detection, identity management, cloud posture, and data classification — each with different business models and growth profiles. Stocks qualify when security demand can materially change the business. Palo Alto derives nearly all revenue from security; for Microsoft, it is a large but smaller share of total revenue. Both respond to the same spending cycle.
Revenue growth and operating margin together — the Rule of 40 — are the starting point for every SaaS security name.
Cybersecurity is predominantly subscription-revenue with high gross margins and premium valuations that punish deceleration. The Rule of 40 (revenue growth + operating margin) is the standard benchmark. A company growing 25% with 20% operating margin scores 45 — healthy. Growing 30% with -10% margin scores 20 — buying growth expensively. Compare both metrics side by side in the table.
The biggest risk is paying 50x earnings for a company whose growth is about to decelerate.
Security spend is harder to cut than marketing, but premium multiples leave no room for execution misses. When 30% growth at 15x sales decelerates to 22%, expect a 30% drawdown as markets reprice. Platform consolidation (PANW, CRWD) threatens point-product specialists lacking adjacent use cases. Growth, margins, and valuation together show whether the premium is justified or already priced in.
Companies whose revenue is materially driven by protecting networks, endpoints, identities, data, and cloud infrastructure from digital threats. Spans firewall vendors (PANW, FTNT), endpoint platforms (CRWD, S), identity providers (OKTA, CYBR), cloud security (ZS), and mega-cap platforms building security as a major product line.
Palo Alto Networks (PANW) and CrowdStrike (CRWD) are the two largest pure-plays pursuing platform consolidation. Fortinet (FTNT) leads in firewall economics with highest operating margins. Zscaler (ZS) dominates cloud-native zero-trust. CyberArk (CYBR) leads privileged access management. Each has different growth, margins, and valuation — compare them in the table.
The defining debate in cybersecurity. PANW is executing platformization with free trials to drive ARR consolidation — accepts near-term billings headwinds. CRWD built its platform from endpoint outward with one of the highest net dollar retention rates in SaaS. PANW trades at lower multiple; CRWD trades at premium but delivers more consistent acceleration. Compare growth, margins, and multiples.
Recession-resistant, not recession-proof. Security spend is harder to cut than marketing (breach cost exceeds annual security budget), but budget compression still happens: longer deal cycles, smaller contracts, delayed expansion. The group held up better than most growth software in 2022-23 but still de-rated on multiple compression.
Rule of 40: revenue growth + operating margin should equal at least 40%. A company growing 25% with 20% margin scores 45 (strong). Growing 35% with -5% margin scores 30 (buying growth expensively). Companies scoring above 40 with improving margins typically command premium multiples. Both metrics are in the table for every name.
Major breach events (SolarWinds, Colonial Pipeline, MOVEit) act as demand catalysts — security budgets accelerate, board scrutiny increases, vendors in affected category see pipeline expansion. Effect is usually group-wide rather than stock-specific. Conversely, when a vendor itself has an incident (like CRWD's 2024 outage), that stock can sell off sharply.
Leaders trade at 30-60x earnings, 10-20x sales. Whether that is overvalued depends on growth durability, margin trajectory, and competitive moat. Companies with Rule of 40 scores above 50, expanding margins, and platform-level moats have historically justified premiums. Use P/S, P/E, and operating margin together to judge whether multiple matches business quality.
Zscaler (ZS) is the largest pure-play zero-trust access provider. Palo Alto offers it through Prisma Access. CrowdStrike approaches from endpoint with identity-aware protection. Okta (OKTA) handles the identity layer. Fortinet (FTNT) integrates ZTNA into FortiGate. Each addresses a different layer — investors often hold multiple segments.
ETFs (BUG, CIBR, HACK) give diversified exposure but weight holdings by market cap or rules that may bundle high-margin leaders with slower legacy names. Individual selection lets you concentrate on best growth-and-margin profiles at attractive valuations. Screen the universe, compare Rule of 40, and verify execution before committing capital.
Enterprises reducing security vendors by adopting integrated platforms covering firewall, endpoint, identity, cloud from one vendor. PANW and CRWD are leading this shift. Creates winners (platforms gaining cross-category share) and losers (point-products losing wallet share to bundles). Check whether a company is expanding its platform or defending a single product line.
Most pure-plays do not — they reinvest into R&D, sales, and acquisitions to sustain 20-30% growth. A few mature names (Cisco, Check Point, Gen Digital) pay dividends or run buybacks. For security exposure with income, focus on the established-platform segment and compare dividend yield against growth rates.
Revenue growth (proxy for ARR), gross margin (75%+ confirms SaaS model), operating margin (profitability half of Rule of 40), net dollar retention (120%+ signals strong upselling), RPO (forward revenue visibility). For valuation: P/S works across profitable and pre-profit names; P/E adds context for profitable majority.
Multiple compression on slight growth deceleration. Platform consolidation eroding point-product share. Macro-driven budget compression lengthening deal cycles. Execution risk during business model transitions. Premium valuations amplify downside — 15x sales company guiding down 2 points on growth can lose 25-30% in a session.