Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FATN logo
FATN
NVDA logo
NVDA
AMD logo
AMD
SIFY logo
SIFY
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FATN vs NVDA vs AMD vs SIFY

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$5.05T
5Y Perf.+92.5%
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.

Semiconductors

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$799.40B
5Y Perf.+377.3%
SIFY
Sify Technologies Limited

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • IN
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+268.9%

FATN vs NVDA vs AMD vs SIFY — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FATN logoFATN
NVDA logoNVDA
AMD logoAMD
SIFY logoSIFY
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureSemiconductorsSemiconductorsTelecommunications Services
Market Cap$85M$5.05T$799.40B$1.14B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$253.49B$37.45B$41.45B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$159.61B$4.99B$-1.50B
Gross Margin87.2%74.1%50.3%38.6%
Operating Margin18.7%64.0%11.7%5.2%
Forward P/E20.8x23.5x65.8x
Total Debt$6M$11.41B$4.47B$39.51B
Cash & Equiv.$5M$10.61B$5.54B$5.00B

FATN vs NVDA vs AMD vs SIFYLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FATN
NVDA
AMD
SIFY
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
FatPipe, Inc. Commo… (FATN)100Infinity+Infinity%
NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)100192.5+92.5%
Advanced Micro Devi… (AMD)100477.3+377.3%
Sify Technologies L… (SIFY)100368.9+268.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FATN vs NVDA vs AMD vs SIFY

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NVDA leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. SIFY also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇NVDA emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
The Secondary Option

FATN lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
NVDA
NVIDIA Corporation
The Growth Play

NVDA carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.

  • Rev growth 65.5%, EPS growth 66.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 100.0%
  • 180.8% 10Y total return vs AMD's 108.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 1.81, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 3.91x
  • PEG 0.25 vs AMD's 12.73
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
AMD
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

AMD is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if momentum is your priority.

  • +302.8% vs FATN's -24.3%
Best for: momentum
SIFY
Sify Technologies Limited
The Income Pick

SIFY is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.78, yield 0.0%
  • Beta 1.78, yield 0.0%, current ratio 0.96x
  • Beta 1.78 vs AMD's 2.78
Best for: income & stability and defensive
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthNVDA logoNVDA65.5% revenue growth vs SIFY's 11.9%
ValueNVDA logoNVDABetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsNVDA logoNVDA63.0% margin vs SIFY's -3.6%
Stability / SafetySIFY logoSIFYBeta 1.78 vs AMD's 2.78
DividendsNVDA logoNVDA0.0% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SIFY's 0.0%, (2 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)AMD logoAMD+302.8% vs FATN's -24.3%
Efficiency (ROA)NVDA logoNVDA83.1% ROA vs SIFY's -3.6%, ROIC 81.8% vs 3.3%

FATN vs NVDA vs AMD vs SIFY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the AI Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the AI Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FATNFatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
FY 2025
Product
67.9%$13M
Service
19.6%$4M
Consulting
12.5%$2M
NVDANVIDIA Corporation
FY 2026
Data Center
89.7%$193.7B
Gaming
7.4%$16.0B
Professional Visualization
1.5%$3.2B
Automotive
1.1%$2.3B
OEM And Other
0.3%$619M
AMDAdvanced Micro Devices, Inc.
FY 2025
Data Center
43.2%$16.6B
Client and Gaming
37.7%$14.6B
Gaming
10.1%$3.9B
Embedded
9.0%$3.5B
SIFYSify Technologies Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

FATN vs NVDA vs AMD vs SIFY — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNVDALAGGINGAMD

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

NVDA is the larger business by revenue, generating $253.5B annually — 13197.0x FATN's $19M. NVDA is the more profitable business, keeping 63.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIFY's -3.6%. On growth, FATN holds the edge at +129.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationAMD logoAMDAdvanced Micro De…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$253.5B$37.5B$41.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M$165.5B$6.6B$8.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M$159.6B$5.0B-$1.5B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$788,908$119.1B$8.6B$0
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.2%+74.1%+50.3%+38.6%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.7%+64.0%+11.7%+5.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.9%+63.0%+13.3%-3.6%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.1%+47.0%+22.9%-9.2%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+129.5%+85.2%+37.8%+2.5%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.1%+90.9%-3.7%
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

SIFY leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 17.4x trailing earnings, FATN trades at a 91% valuation discount to AMD's 185.0x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NVDA offers better value at 0.44x vs AMD's 35.82x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationAMD logoAMDAdvanced Micro De…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…
Market CapShares × price$85M$5.05T$799.4B$1.1B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$86M$5.05T$798.3B$1.5B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.40x42.58x185.03x-139.07x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.76x23.51x65.76x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.44x35.82x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.70x37.94x119.19x18.24x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.45x23.40x23.08x2.74x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.38x32.52x12.73x5.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF52.27x118.69x
SIFY leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

NVDA delivers a 111.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $112 in annual profit, vs $-7 for SIFY. AMD carries lower financial leverage with a 0.07x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SIFY's 1.96x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMD scores 8/9 vs SIFY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationAMD logoAMDAdvanced Micro De…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.7%+111.7%+8.1%-7.5%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.2%+83.1%+6.5%-3.6%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.9%+81.8%+4.7%+3.3%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.8%+97.2%+5.7%+4.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–94483
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x0.07x0.07x1.96x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$493,351$807M-$1.1B$34.5B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$10.6B$5.5B$5.0B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$11.4B$4.5B$39.5B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.75x636.02x33.19x0.90x
NVDA leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NVDA five years ago would be worth $119,713 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,434 for SIFY. Over the past 12 months, AMD leads with a +302.8% total return vs FATN's -24.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors NVDA at 75.7% vs SIFY's 22.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationAMD logoAMDAdvanced Micro De…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+183.3%+10.6%+119.4%+28.5%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-24.3%+46.5%+302.8%+229.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+442.7%+305.1%+85.3%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+1097.1%+506.2%-25.7%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+18081.7%+10893.9%+138.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+75.7%+59.4%+22.8%
NVDA leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — AMD and SIFY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

SIFY is the less volatile stock with a 1.78 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMD's 2.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMD currently trades 89.8% from its 52-week high vs FATN's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationAMD logoAMDAdvanced Micro De…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.17x1.81x2.78x1.78x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.90$236.54$546.15$17.85
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.31$140.85$115.06$4.15
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.9%+88.2%+89.8%+88.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.443.854.541.1
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M149.8M36.5M69K
Evenly matched — AMD and SIFY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — NVDA and SIFY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FATN as "Buy", NVDA as "Buy", AMD as "Buy", SIFY as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.3% upside for NVDA (target: $309) vs -8.3% for AMD (target: $450).

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…NVDA logoNVDANVIDIA CorporationAMD logoAMDAdvanced Micro De…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$309.46$449.64
# AnalystsCovering analysts179701
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+0.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises200
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.04$0.31
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%+0.8%+0.2%0.0%
Evenly matched — NVDA and SIFY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NVDA leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SIFY leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallNVIDIA Corporation (NVDA)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FATN vs NVDA vs AMD vs SIFY: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FATN or NVDA or AMD or SIFY a better buy right now?

For growth investors, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the stronger pick with 65.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) offers the better valuation at 17. 4x trailing P/E (20. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FATN or NVDA or AMD or SIFY?

On trailing P/E, FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is the cheapest at 17. 4x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. at 185. 0x. On forward P/E, FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock is actually cheaper at 20. 8x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NVIDIA Corporation wins at 0. 25x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 73x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FATN or NVDA or AMD or SIFY?

Over the past 5 years, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) delivered a total return of +1097%, compared to -25.

7% for Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: NVDA returned +180. 8% versus SIFY's +138. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FATN or NVDA or AMD or SIFY?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is the lower-risk stock at 1.

78β versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 2. 78β — meaning AMD is approximately 56% more volatile than SIFY relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (AMD) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 7% versus 196% for Sify Technologies Limited — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FATN or NVDA or AMD or SIFY?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is pulling ahead at 65.

5% versus 11. 9% for Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. grew EPS 165. 0% year-over-year, compared to -520. 9% for Sify Technologies Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, NVDA leads at 100. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FATN or NVDA or AMD or SIFY?

NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more profitable company, earning 55.

6% net margin versus -2. 0% for Sify Technologies Limited — meaning it keeps 55. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: NVDA leads at 60. 4% versus 5. 7% for SIFY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FATN leads at 76. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FATN or NVDA or AMD or SIFY more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, NVIDIA Corporation (NVDA) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 25x versus Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. 's 12. 73x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) trades at 20. 8x forward P/E versus 65. 8x for Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. — 45. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NVDA: 48. 3% to $309. 46.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FATN or NVDA or AMD or SIFY?

None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.

All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.

09

Is FATN or NVDA or AMD or SIFY better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+138.

4% 10Y return). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FATN and NVDA and AMD and SIFY?

These companies operate in different sectors (FATN (Technology) and NVDA (Technology) and AMD (Technology) and SIFY (Communication Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FATN is a small-cap high-growth stock; NVDA is a mega-cap high-growth stock; AMD is a large-cap high-growth stock; SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.