Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FATN logo
FATN
SIFY logo
SIFY
JPM logo
JPM
KO logo
KO
CSCO logo
CSCO
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FATN vs SIFY vs JPM vs KO vs CSCO

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock

Software - Infrastructure

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$85M
5Y Perf.
SIFY
Sify Technologies Limited

Telecommunications Services

Communication ServicesNASDAQ • IN
Market Cap$1.14B
5Y Perf.+268.9%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$869.15B
5Y Perf.+26.8%
KO
The Coca-Cola Company

Beverages - Non-Alcoholic

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$342.35B
5Y Perf.+11.1%
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.

Communication Equipment

TechnologyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$489.33B
5Y Perf.+101.2%

FATN vs SIFY vs JPM vs KO vs CSCO — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FATN logoFATN
SIFY logoSIFY
JPM logoJPM
KO logoKO
CSCO logoCSCO
IndustrySoftware - InfrastructureTelecommunications ServicesBanks - DiversifiedBeverages - Non-AlcoholicCommunication Equipment
Market Cap$85M$1.14B$869.15B$342.35B$489.33B
Revenue (TTM)$19M$41.45B$280.33B$49.28B$60.75B
Net Income (TTM)$5M$-1.50B$57.05B$13.70B$11.96B
Gross Margin87.2%38.6%60.0%61.7%64.3%
Operating Margin18.7%5.2%25.9%29.3%23.4%
Forward P/E20.8x14.0x24.3x29.0x
Total Debt$6M$39.51B$942.38B$45.49B$28.09B
Cash & Equiv.$5M$5.00B$343.34B$10.27B$8.35B

FATN vs SIFY vs JPM vs KO vs CSCOLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FATN
SIFY
JPM
KO
CSCO
StockMar 25Jun 26Return
FatPipe, Inc. Commo… (FATN)100Infinity+Infinity%
Sify Technologies L… (SIFY)100368.9+268.9%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100126.8+26.8%
The Coca-Cola Compa… (KO)100111.1+11.1%
Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)100201.2+101.2%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FATN vs SIFY vs JPM vs KO vs CSCO

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FATN and JPM are tied at the top with 2 categories each (5-stock set) — the right choice depends on your priorities. JPMorgan Chase & Co. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. KO and SIFY also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FATN
FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
The Growth Play

FATN has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 17.9%, EPS growth 133.3%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.7%
  • 17.9% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
  • 15.2% ROA vs SIFY's -3.6%, ROIC 11.9% vs 3.3%
Best for: growth exposure
SIFY
Sify Technologies Limited
The Momentum Pick

SIFY is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.

  • +229.0% vs FATN's -24.3%
Best for: momentum
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.95, yield 1.9%
  • 433.9% 10Y total return vs CSCO's 375.2%
  • PEG 1.07 vs KO's 2.18
  • Beta 0.95, yield 1.9%, current ratio 0.52x
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KO
The Coca-Cola Company
The Quality Compounder

KO ranks third and is worth considering specifically for quality and dividends.

  • 27.8% margin vs SIFY's -3.6%
  • 2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Best for: quality and dividends
CSCO
Cisco Systems, Inc.
The Defensive Pick

CSCO is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night.

  • Lower volatility, beta 1.04, Low D/E 60.0%, current ratio 1.00x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFATN logoFATN17.9% revenue growth vs KO's 1.9%
ValueJPM logoJPMLower P/E (14.0x vs 29.0x)
Quality / MarginsKO logoKO27.8% margin vs SIFY's -3.6%
Stability / SafetyJPM logoJPMBeta 0.95 vs FATN's 2.17
DividendsKO logoKO2.6% yield, 56-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)SIFY logoSIFY+229.0% vs FATN's -24.3%
Efficiency (ROA)FATN logoFATN15.2% ROA vs SIFY's -3.6%, ROIC 11.9% vs 3.3%

FATN vs SIFY vs JPM vs KO vs CSCO — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

Discover the Cybersecurity Stocks Theme

These companies are key players in the Cybersecurity Stocks ecosystem. See how they stack up against the rest of the sector.

Explore Theme
FATNFatPipe, Inc. Common Stock
FY 2025
Product
67.9%$13M
Service
19.6%$4M
Consulting
12.5%$2M
SIFYSify Technologies Limited

Segment breakdown not available.

JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
KOThe Coca-Cola Company
FY 2025
Pacific
84.6%$31.6B
Bottling investments
15.4%$5.7B
CSCOCisco Systems, Inc.
FY 2025
Networking
50.0%$28.3B
Service
26.6%$15.0B
Security
14.3%$8.1B
Collaboration
7.3%$4.2B
Observability
1.9%$1.1B

FATN vs SIFY vs JPM vs KO vs CSCO — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLKOLAGGINGSIFY

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

Evenly matched — FATN and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 14594.4x FATN's $19M. KO is the more profitable business, keeping 27.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SIFY's -3.6%. On growth, FATN holds the edge at +129.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$19M$41.4B$280.3B$49.3B$60.7B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$4M$8.6B$81.4B$15.5B$16.5B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$5M-$1.5B$57.0B$13.7B$12.0B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex-$788,908$0$100.9B$12.6B$12.6B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+87.2%+38.6%+60.0%+61.7%+64.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+18.7%+5.2%+25.9%+29.3%+23.4%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+25.9%-3.6%+20.4%+27.8%+19.7%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue-4.1%-9.2%+36.0%+25.5%+20.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+129.5%+2.5%+12.1%+12.0%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.7%+16.0%+18.2%+37.1%
Evenly matched — FATN and KO each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 15.5x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 68% valuation discount to CSCO's 48.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), JPM offers better value at 1.19x vs KO's 2.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
Market CapShares × price$85M$1.1B$869.1B$342.4B$489.3B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$86M$1.5B$1.47T$377.6B$509.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS17.40x-139.07x15.52x26.16x48.69x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.20.76x13.97x24.33x29.04x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x2.34x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple21.70x18.24x18.03x25.49x34.82x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue4.45x2.74x3.11x7.14x8.64x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share3.38x5.43x2.40x10.01x10.60x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF8.62x64.64x36.82x
JPM leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — FATN and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

KO delivers a 41.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $41 in annual profit, vs $-7 for SIFY. FATN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CSCO scores 8/9 vs SIFY's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+22.7%-7.5%+15.9%+41.1%+25.1%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+15.2%-3.6%+1.3%+13.1%+9.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+11.9%+3.3%+4.5%+15.8%+13.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+13.8%+4.4%+8.9%+17.3%+13.7%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–943578
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.23x1.96x2.60x1.33x0.60x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$493,351$34.5B$599.0B$35.2B$19.7B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$5.0B$343.3B$10.3B$8.3B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$6M$39.5B$942.4B$45.5B$28.1B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense7.75x0.90x0.74x10.70x10.61x
Evenly matched — FATN and KO each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CSCO five years ago would be worth $24,386 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $7,434 for SIFY. Over the past 12 months, SIFY leads with a +229.0% total return vs FATN's -24.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CSCO at 37.4% vs KO's 12.3% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+183.3%+28.5%-3.5%+15.8%+64.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-24.3%+229.0%+18.8%+13.7%+90.9%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+85.3%+131.9%+41.5%+159.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-25.7%+102.6%+59.8%+143.9%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+138.4%+433.9%+112.2%+375.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+22.8%+32.4%+12.3%+37.4%
CSCO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KO is the less volatile stock with a -0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FATN's 2.17 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KO currently trades 96.2% from its 52-week high vs FATN's 55.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5002.17x1.78x0.95x-0.15x1.04x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$10.90$17.85$337.25$82.66$130.37
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$1.31$4.15$262.71$65.35$63.87
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+55.9%+88.5%+92.2%+96.2%+95.2%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10056.441.159.651.463.0
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded1.4M69K7.1M12.5M21.7M
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FATN as "Buy", SIFY as "Buy", JPM as "Buy", KO as "Buy", CSCO as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 8.9% upside for JPM (target: $339) vs -1.5% for CSCO (target: $122). For income investors, KO offers the higher dividend yield at 2.56% vs CSCO's 1.30%.

MetricFATN logoFATNFatPipe, Inc. Com…SIFY logoSIFYSify Technologies…JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …KO logoKOThe Coca-Cola Com…CSCO logoCSCOCisco Systems, In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$338.78$86.29$122.30
# AnalystsCovering analysts11614873
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.0%+1.9%+2.6%+1.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises0155615
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.31$5.95$2.04$1.61
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%+4.0%+0.2%+1.5%
KO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

KO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). JPM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.

Best OverallThe Coca-Cola Company (KO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FATN vs SIFY vs JPM vs KO vs CSCO: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FATN or SIFY or JPM or KO or CSCO a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is the stronger pick with 17. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FATN or SIFY or JPM or KO or CSCO?

On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Cisco Systems, Inc. at 48. 7x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: JPMorgan Chase & Co. wins at 1. 07x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FATN or SIFY or JPM or KO or CSCO?

Over the past 5 years, Cisco Systems, Inc.

(CSCO) delivered a total return of +143. 9%, compared to -25. 7% for Sify Technologies Limited (SIFY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +433. 9% versus KO's +112. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FATN or SIFY or JPM or KO or CSCO?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

15β versus FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock's 2. 17β — meaning FATN is approximately -1568% more volatile than KO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FATN or SIFY or JPM or KO or CSCO?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FatPipe, Inc.

Common Stock (FATN) is pulling ahead at 17. 9% versus 1. 9% for The Coca-Cola Company (KO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock grew EPS 133. 3% year-over-year, compared to -520. 9% for Sify Technologies Limited. Over a 3-year CAGR, SIFY leads at 13. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FATN or SIFY or JPM or KO or CSCO?

The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the more profitable company, earning 27.

3% net margin versus -2. 0% for Sify Technologies Limited — meaning it keeps 27. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: KO leads at 28. 7% versus 5. 7% for SIFY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FATN leads at 76. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FATN or SIFY or JPM or KO or CSCO more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 07x versus The Coca-Cola Company's 2. 18x. A PEG below 1. 5 suggests fair-to-attractive pricing relative to expected growth. On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 29. 0x for Cisco Systems, Inc. — 15. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for JPM: 8. 9% to $338. 78.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FATN or SIFY or JPM or KO or CSCO?

In this comparison, KO (2.

6% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield), CSCO (1. 3% yield) pay a dividend. FATN, SIFY do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FATN or SIFY or JPM or KO or CSCO better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, The Coca-Cola Company (KO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

15), 2. 6% yield, +112. 2% 10Y return). FatPipe, Inc. Common Stock (FATN) carries a higher beta of 2. 17 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FATN and SIFY and JPM and KO and CSCO?

These companies operate in different sectors (FATN (Technology) and SIFY (Communication Services) and JPM (Financial Services) and KO (Consumer Defensive) and CSCO (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FATN is a small-cap high-growth stock; SIFY is a small-cap quality compounder stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; KO is a large-cap quality compounder stock; CSCO is a large-cap quality compounder stock. JPM, KO, CSCO pay a dividend while FATN, SIFY do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.