FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$4.68B
5Y Perf.-25.0%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MAS
Masco Corporation
Construction
Market Cap$14.51B
5Y Perf.+54.2%
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
Chemicals - Specialty
Market Cap$78.98B
5Y Perf.+61.8%
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
Construction
Market Cap$7.05B
5Y Perf.+119.0%
FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FBIN | MAS | SHW | AWI |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Construction | Construction | Chemicals - Specialty | Construction |
| Market Cap | $4.68B | $14.51B | $78.98B | $7.05B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $3.36B | $7.68B | $23.94B | $1.65B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $195M | $837M | $2.60B | $306M |
| Gross Margin | 45.6% | 35.4% | 49.1% | 40.3% |
| Operating Margin | 10.6% | 16.8% | 16.1% | 27.5% |
| Forward P/E | 11.5x | 16.9x | 27.3x | 19.9x |
| Total Debt | $2.54B | $3.44B | $14.53B | $532M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $264M | $647M | $207M | $113M |
FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FBIN
MAS
SHW
AWI
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortune Brands Inno… (FBIN) | 100 | 75.0 | -25.0% |
| Masco Corporation (MAS) | 100 | 154.2 | +54.2% |
| The Sherwin-William… (SHW) | 100 | 161.8 | +61.8% |
| Armstrong World Ind… (AWI) | 100 | 219.0 | +119.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: AWI leads in 3 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and dividend income and shareholder returns. MAS and SHW also each lead in at least one category. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FBIN
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
The Value Pick
FBIN is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if valuation efficiency and defensive is your priority.
- PEG 2.77 vs SHW's 3.94
- Beta 1.61, yield 2.5%, current ratio 1.84x
- Lower P/E (11.5x vs 19.9x)
- 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SHW's 1.0%
Best for: valuation efficiency and defensive
MAS
Masco Corporation
The Momentum Pick
MAS is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +21.1% vs FBIN's -16.8%
Best for: momentum
SHW
The Sherwin-Williams Company
The Income Pick
SHW is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 1.0%
- Beta 0.79 vs FBIN's 1.61
Best for: income & stability
AWI
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
The Growth Play
AWI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 12.1%, EPS growth 17.6%, 3Y rev CAGR 9.5%
- 330.4% 10Y total return vs SHW's 250.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.82, Low D/E 59.0%, current ratio 1.46x
- 12.1% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4%
Best for: growth exposure and long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | AWI | 12.1% revenue growth vs MAS's -3.4% |
| Value | FBIN | Lower P/E (11.5x vs 19.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | AWI | 18.6% margin vs FBIN's 5.8% |
| Stability / Safety | SHW | Beta 0.79 vs FBIN's 1.61 |
| Dividends | FBIN | 2.5% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs SHW's 1.0% |
| Momentum (1Y) | MAS | +21.1% vs FBIN's -16.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AWI | 16.0% ROA vs FBIN's 3.0%, ROIC 24.9% vs 8.1% |
FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FY 2025
FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAWILAGGINGSHW
Who Leads Where
AWI leads in 3 of 6 categories
FBIN leads 1 • MAS leads 0 • SHW leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓SHWThe Sherwin-Williams …
0leads
MASMasco Corporation
0leads
FBINFortune Brands Innova…
1leads
AWIArmstrong World Indus…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FBINvs MASMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AWI4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FBIN7/7
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AWI6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AWI4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SHW is the larger business by revenue, generating $23.9B annually — 14.5x AWI's $1.6B. AWI is the more profitable business, keeping 18.6% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FBIN's 5.8%. On growth, AWI holds the edge at +7.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $3.4B | $7.7B | $23.9B | $1.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $482M | $1.4B | $4.5B | $603M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $195M | $837M | $2.6B | $306M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $420M | $943M | $2.9B | $247M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +45.6% | +35.4% | +49.1% | +40.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +10.6% | +16.8% | +16.1% | +27.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +5.8% | +10.9% | +10.9% | +18.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +12.5% | +12.3% | +12.1% | +15.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -106.4% | +6.5% | +6.8% | +7.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.0% | +20.7% | +7.5% | -1.9% |
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FBIN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.8x trailing earnings, FBIN trades at a 49% valuation discount to SHW's 31.2x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIN offers better value at 2.77x vs SHW's 4.51x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $4.7B | $14.5B | $79.0B | $7.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $7.0B | $17.3B | $93.3B | $7.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 15.82x | 18.63x | 31.18x | 23.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 11.50x | 16.85x | 27.27x | 19.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.77x | 3.76x | 4.51x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.08x | 12.18x | 21.24x | 17.23x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.05x | 1.92x | 3.35x | 4.35x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.98x | 201.40x | 17.33x | 7.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.77x | 16.76x | 29.76x | 28.63x |
FBIN leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AWI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MAS delivers a 8.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $8 in annual profit, vs $8 for FBIN. AWI carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to MAS's 45.81x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AWI scores 9/9 vs SHW's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.3% | +8.0% | +58.2% | +34.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +3.0% | +15.9% | +10.0% | +16.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +8.1% | +35.4% | +16.5% | +24.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.9% | +35.9% | +21.3% | +26.5% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 6 | 9 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.07x | 45.81x | 3.16x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $2.3B | $2.8B | $14.3B | $419M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $264M | $647M | $207M | $113M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $2.5B | $3.4B | $14.5B | $532M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.72x | 12.60x | 7.83x | 13.31x |
AWI leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AWI five years ago would be worth $16,301 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $4,599 for FBIN. Over the past 12 months, MAS leads with a +21.1% total return vs FBIN's -16.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AWI at 36.0% vs FBIN's -13.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -22.8% | +12.1% | -2.1% | -16.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -16.8% | +21.1% | -8.0% | +11.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -36.3% | +40.1% | +42.4% | +151.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -54.0% | +16.1% | +16.1% | +63.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -2.4% | +152.1% | +250.0% | +330.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -13.9% | +11.9% | +12.5% | +36.0% |
AWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — MAS and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SHW is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIN's 1.61 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MAS currently trades 90.8% from its 52-week high vs FBIN's 60.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.61x | 1.28x | 0.79x | 0.82x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $64.84 | $79.19 | $379.65 | $206.08 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $36.07 | $58.16 | $301.58 | $148.25 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.3% | +90.8% | +84.3% | +80.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 46.8 | 59.6 | 47.6 | 41.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 2.6M | 2.7M | 1.6M | 494K |
Evenly matched — MAS and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIN and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FBIN as "Hold", MAS as "Buy", SHW as "Buy", AWI as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for FBIN (target: $60) vs 14.5% for MAS (target: $82). For income investors, FBIN offers the higher dividend yield at 2.55% vs AWI's 0.77%.
| Metric | FBINFortune Brands In… | MASMasco Corporation | SHWThe Sherwin-Willi… | AWIArmstrong World I… |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $59.83 | $82.36 | $389.43 | $197.50 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 38 | 38 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.5% | +1.7% | +1.0% | +0.8% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 | 37 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | $1.24 | $3.17 | $1.27 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +5.3% | +3.9% | 0.0% | +1.8% |
Evenly matched — FBIN and SHW each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
AWI leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIN leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
Best OverallArmstrong World Industries,… (AWI)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FBIN vs MAS vs SHW vs AWI: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger pick with 12. 1% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the better valuation at 15. 8x trailing P/E (11. 5x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Masco Corporation (MAS) a "Buy" — based on 38 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
On trailing P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.
(FBIN) is the cheapest at 15. 8x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company at 31. 2x. On forward P/E, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 5x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. wins at 2. 77x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 94x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
Over the past 5 years, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) delivered a total return of +63. 0%, compared to -54. 0% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AWI returned +330. 4% versus FBIN's -2. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), The Sherwin-Williams Company (SHW) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
79β versus Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. 's 1. 61β — meaning FBIN is approximately 103% more volatile than SHW relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 46% for Masco Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is pulling ahead at 12. 1% versus -3. 4% for Masco Corporation (MAS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Armstrong World Industries, Inc. grew EPS 17. 6% year-over-year, compared to -34. 1% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AWI leads at 9. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the more profitable company, earning 19. 0% net margin versus 6. 7% for Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AWI leads at 26. 6% versus 11. 6% for FBIN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — SHW leads at 48. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 2. 77x versus The Sherwin-Williams Company's 3. 94x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) trades at 11. 5x forward P/E versus 27. 3x for The Sherwin-Williams Company — 15. 8x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIN: 53. 1% to $59. 83.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) offers the highest yield at 2. 5%, versus 0. 8% for Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (AWI).
09Is FBIN or MAS or SHW or AWI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Armstrong World Industries, Inc.
(AWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 82), 0. 8% yield, +330. 4% 10Y return). Fortune Brands Innovations, Inc. (FBIN) carries a higher beta of 1. 61 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (AWI: +330. 4%, FBIN: -2. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBIN and MAS and SHW and AWI?
These companies operate in different sectors (FBIN (Industrials) and MAS (Industrials) and SHW (Basic Materials) and AWI (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FBIN is a small-cap deep-value stock; MAS is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; SHW is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; AWI is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FBIN: -106.4% · MAS: 6.5%)Net Margin>
%
(FBIN: 5.8% · MAS: 10.9%)P/E Ratio<
x
(FBIN: 15.8x · MAS: 18.6x)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.