Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FBIO vs MNOV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Biotechnology
FBIO vs MNOV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $67M | $70M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $62M | $410K |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $-12M |
| Gross Margin | 65.8% | 7.6% |
| Operating Margin | -149.2% | -32.4% |
| Forward P/E | 240.0x | — |
| Total Debt | $76M | $194K |
| Cash & Equiv. | $57M | $31M |
FBIO vs MNOV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fortress Biotech, I… (FBIO) | 100 | 5.5 | -94.5% |
| MediciNova, Inc. (MNOV) | 100 | 26.8 | -73.2% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBIO vs MNOV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBIO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth -31.8%, EPS growth 68.2%, 3Y rev CAGR -5.7%
- 6.4% margin vs MNOV's -29.3%
- 1.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend
MNOV is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- beta 0.31
- -80.1% 10Y total return vs FBIO's -94.8%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.31, Low D/E 0.5%, current ratio 8.16x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | -8.8% revenue growth vs FBIO's -31.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 6.4% margin vs MNOV's -29.3% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.31 vs FBIO's 0.97 | |
| Dividends | 1.4% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +39.5% vs MNOV's -4.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 2.2% ROA vs MNOV's -26.3%, ROIC -6.3% vs -85.5% |
FBIO vs MNOV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FBIO vs MNOV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBIO leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBIO is the larger business by revenue, generating $62M annually — 152.1x MNOV's $409,657. FBIO is the more profitable business, keeping 6.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to MNOV's -29.3%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $62M | $409,657 |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$88M | -$13M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | -$12M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$66M | -$10M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +65.8% | +7.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -149.2% | -32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +6.4% | -29.3% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -106.2% | -23.9% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +20.5% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +114.5% | +4.7% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FBIO and MNOV each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $67M | $70M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $86M | $40M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.89x | -5.96x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 240.00x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.16x | 171.21x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 1.69x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
MNOV leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIO delivers a 6.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $6 in annual profit, vs $-29 for MNOV. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MNOV scores 3/9 vs FBIO's 1/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +6.1% | -28.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +2.2% | -26.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -6.3% | -85.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -142.0% | -28.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.00x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $19M | -$31M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $57M | $31M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $76M | $194,331 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -4.25x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MNOV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MNOV five years ago would be worth $3,488 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $406 for FBIO. Over the past 12 months, FBIO leads with a +39.5% total return vs MNOV's -4.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MNOV at -13.2% vs FBIO's -40.0% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -40.4% | +7.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +39.5% | -4.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -78.4% | -34.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -95.9% | -65.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -94.8% | -80.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -40.0% | -13.2% |
Risk & Volatility
MNOV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MNOV is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FBIO's 0.97 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MNOV currently trades 73.0% from its 52-week high vs FBIO's 53.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.97x | 0.31x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $4.53 | $1.96 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.60 | $1.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +53.0% | +73.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 54.7 | 55.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 407K | 47K |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
FBIO is the only dividend payer here at 1.39% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 6 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.4% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.03 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
MNOV leads in 3 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). FBIO leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 1 tied.
FBIO vs MNOV: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBIO or MNOV a better buy right now?
Analysts rate Fortress Biotech, Inc.
(FBIO) a "Buy" — based on 6 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FBIO or MNOV?
Over the past 5 years, MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) delivered a total return of -65. 1%, compared to -95. 9% for Fortress Biotech, Inc. (FBIO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MNOV returned -80. 1% versus FBIO's -94. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FBIO or MNOV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 31β versus Fortress Biotech, Inc. 's 0. 97β — meaning FBIO is approximately 215% more volatile than MNOV relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FBIO or MNOV?
On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Fortress Biotech, Inc.
grew EPS 68. 2% year-over-year, compared to -4. 3% for MediciNova, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FBIO or MNOV?
Fortress Biotech, Inc.
(FBIO) is the more profitable company, earning -79. 8% net margin versus -29. 3% for MediciNova, Inc. — meaning it keeps -79. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FBIO leads at -191. 4% versus -32. 4% for MNOV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBIO leads at 63. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FBIO or MNOV?
In this comparison, FBIO (1.
4% yield) pays a dividend. MNOV does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FBIO or MNOV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, MediciNova, Inc.
(MNOV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 31)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (MNOV: -80. 1%, FBIO: -94. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FBIO and MNOV?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
FBIO pays a dividend while MNOV does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.