Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FBIZ vs TCBK
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FBIZ vs TCBK — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $470M | $1.63B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $279M | $533M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $51M | $122M |
| Gross Margin | 57.3% | 75.9% |
| Operating Margin | 21.6% | 31.7% |
| Forward P/E | 9.1x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $259M | $80M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $31M | $157M |
FBIZ vs TCBK — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Business Fina… (FBIZ) | 100 | 340.7 | +240.7% |
| TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) | 100 | 179.1 | +79.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBIZ vs TCBK
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBIZ carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 13 yrs, beta 0.81, yield 2.1%
- Rev growth 6.4%, EPS growth 16.5%
- 158.8% 10Y total return vs TCBK's 129.5%
TCBK is the clearest fit if your priority is bank quality.
- NIM 3.6% vs FBIZ's 3.3%
- +33.5% vs FBIZ's +19.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 6.4% NII/revenue growth vs TCBK's 1.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.1x vs 12.0x), PEG 0.36 vs 1.05 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TCBK's 0.4% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.81 vs TCBK's 0.93 | |
| Dividends | 2.1% yield, 13-year raise streak, vs TCBK's 2.7% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +33.5% vs FBIZ's +19.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs TCBK's 0.4% |
FBIZ vs TCBK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FBIZ vs TCBK — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCBK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
TCBK is the larger business by revenue, generating $533M annually — 1.9x FBIZ's $279M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 22.8% (TCBK) to 18.0% (FBIZ).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $279M | $533M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $49M | $183M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $51M | $122M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $53M | $124M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +57.3% | +75.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +21.6% | +31.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +18.0% | +22.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +21.9% | +24.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +12.9% | +17.0% |
Valuation Metrics
FBIZ leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.3x trailing earnings, FBIZ trades at a 32% valuation discount to TCBK's 13.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FBIZ offers better value at 0.37x vs TCBK's 1.20x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $470M | $1.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $699M | $1.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 9.30x | 13.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 9.09x | 12.04x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 0.37x | 1.20x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 11.56x | 8.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.68x | 3.06x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.24x | 1.25x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.70x | 12.77x |
Profitability & Efficiency
TCBK leads this category, winning 6 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBIZ delivers a 14.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $9 for TCBK. TCBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.06x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FBIZ's 0.70x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +14.1% | +9.4% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.2% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +7.0% | +8.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +2.6% | +10.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 8 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.70x | 0.06x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $229M | -$77M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $31M | $157M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $259M | $80M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.42x | 1.41x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBIZ leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBIZ five years ago would be worth $22,529 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,109 for TCBK. Over the past 12 months, TCBK leads with a +33.5% total return vs FBIZ's +19.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBIZ at 33.0% vs TCBK's 21.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +6.5% | +8.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +19.7% | +33.5% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +135.1% | +78.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +125.3% | +21.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +158.8% | +129.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +33.0% | +21.2% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FBIZ and TCBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBIZ is the less volatile stock with a 0.81 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TCBK's 0.93 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.81x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $60.54 | $53.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $45.90 | $36.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +93.1% | +95.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 49.6 | 54.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 39K | 143K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FBIZ and TCBK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBIZ as "Buy" and TCBK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 18.8% upside for FBIZ (target: $67) vs 12.9% for TCBK (target: $57). For income investors, TCBK offers the higher dividend yield at 2.72% vs FBIZ's 2.11%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.00 | $57.33 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 10 | 12 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.1% | +2.7% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 13 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.19 | $1.38 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.3% | +2.0% |
TCBK leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FBIZ leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns). 2 tied.
FBIZ vs TCBK: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBIZ or TCBK a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the stronger pick with 6. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 1. 8% for TriCo Bancshares (TCBK). First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) offers the better valuation at 9. 3x trailing P/E (9. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) a "Buy" — based on 10 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBIZ or TCBK?
On trailing P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the cheapest at 9. 3x versus TriCo Bancshares at 13. 7x. On forward P/E, First Business Financial Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 1x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Business Financial Services, Inc. wins at 0. 36x versus TriCo Bancshares's 1. 05x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBIZ or TCBK?
Over the past 5 years, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) delivered a total return of +125. 3%, compared to +21. 1% for TriCo Bancshares (TCBK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBIZ returned +158. 8% versus TCBK's +129. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBIZ or TCBK?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 81β versus TriCo Bancshares's 0. 93β — meaning TCBK is approximately 14% more volatile than FBIZ relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 6% versus 70% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBIZ or TCBK?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is pulling ahead at 6. 4% versus 1. 8% for TriCo Bancshares (TCBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Business Financial Services, Inc. grew EPS 16. 5% year-over-year, compared to 6. 9% for TriCo Bancshares. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBIZ or TCBK?
TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
8% net margin versus 18. 0% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 22. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TCBK leads at 31. 7% versus 21. 6% for FBIZ. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — TCBK leads at 75. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBIZ or TCBK more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 36x versus TriCo Bancshares's 1. 05x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ) trades at 9. 1x forward P/E versus 12. 0x for TriCo Bancshares — 3. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBIZ: 18. 8% to $67. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBIZ or TCBK?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
TriCo Bancshares (TCBK) offers the highest yield at 2. 7%, versus 2. 1% for First Business Financial Services, Inc. (FBIZ).
09Is FBIZ or TCBK better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Business Financial Services, Inc.
(FBIZ) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 81), 2. 1% yield, +158. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBIZ: +158. 8%, TCBK: +129. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBIZ and TCBK?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.