Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FBNC vs SFNC
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FBNC vs SFNC — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $2.45B | $3.13B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $543M | $627M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $111M | $-398M |
| Gross Margin | 70.1% | 5.8% |
| Operating Margin | 26.6% | -84.2% |
| Forward P/E | 12.6x | 10.5x |
| Total Debt | $75M | $641M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $147M | $380M |
FBNC vs SFNC — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Bancorp (FBNC) | 100 | 232.5 | +132.5% |
| Simmons First Natio… (SFNC) | 100 | 125.9 | +25.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FBNC vs SFNC
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FBNC carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 2.3%, EPS growth 45.7%
- 228.2% 10Y total return vs SFNC's 26.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.96, Low D/E 4.5%, current ratio 0.24x
SFNC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and defensive.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 1.02, yield 4.0%
- Beta 1.02, yield 4.0%, current ratio 0.86x
- Lower P/E (10.5x vs 12.6x)
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 2.3% NII/revenue growth vs SFNC's -56.7% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.5x vs 12.6x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.96 vs SFNC's 1.02, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 4.0% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs FBNC's 1.5% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +44.8% vs SFNC's +17.7% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs SFNC's 0.9% |
FBNC vs SFNC — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FBNC vs SFNC — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FBNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
SFNC and FBNC operate at a comparable scale, with $627M and $543M in trailing revenue. FBNC is the more profitable business, keeping 20.4% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to SFNC's -63.4%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $543M | $627M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $155M | -$497M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $111M | -$398M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $199M | $755M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +70.1% | +5.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +26.6% | -84.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +20.4% | -63.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +36.6% | +71.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +3.4% | +42.1% |
Valuation Metrics
SFNC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $2.4B | $3.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $2.4B | $3.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.05x | -7.32x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.60x | 10.46x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 15.36x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.51x | 4.99x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.48x | 0.85x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.31x | 6.95x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FBNC leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FBNC delivers a 7.0% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $7 in annual profit, vs $-12 for SFNC. FBNC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.05x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to SFNC's 0.19x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FBNC scores 6/9 vs SFNC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +7.0% | -11.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.9% | -1.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.8% | -9.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +5.9% | -4.2% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.05x | 0.19x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$72M | $261M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $147M | $380M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $75M | $641M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.91x | -1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FBNC leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FBNC five years ago would be worth $14,088 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,512 for SFNC. Over the past 12 months, FBNC leads with a +44.8% total return vs SFNC's +17.7%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FBNC at 29.6% vs SFNC's 15.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +16.5% | +15.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +44.8% | +17.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +117.5% | +54.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +40.9% | -14.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +228.2% | +26.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +29.6% | +15.7% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FBNC and SFNC each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FBNC is the less volatile stock with a 0.96 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than SFNC's 1.02 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SFNC currently trades 97.3% from its 52-week high vs FBNC's 94.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.96x | 1.02x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $62.64 | $22.18 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $40.00 | $17.00 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +94.3% | +97.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 60.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 202K | 1.2M |
Analyst Outlook
SFNC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FBNC as "Buy" and SFNC as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 6.6% upside for FBNC (target: $63) vs 5.0% for SFNC (target: $23). For income investors, SFNC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.95% vs FBNC's 1.53%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $63.00 | $22.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 16 | 9 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.5% | +4.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 6 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.90 | $0.85 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.0% | 0.0% |
FBNC leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). SFNC leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.
FBNC vs SFNC: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FBNC or SFNC a better buy right now?
For growth investors, First Bancorp (FBNC) is the stronger pick with 2.
3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). First Bancorp (FBNC) offers the better valuation at 22. 0x trailing P/E (12. 6x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Bancorp (FBNC) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FBNC or SFNC?
On forward P/E, Simmons First National Corporation is actually cheaper at 10.
5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FBNC or SFNC?
Over the past 5 years, First Bancorp (FBNC) delivered a total return of +40.
9%, compared to -14. 9% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FBNC returned +228. 2% versus SFNC's +26. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FBNC or SFNC?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Bancorp (FBNC) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
96β versus Simmons First National Corporation's 1. 02β — meaning SFNC is approximately 7% more volatile than FBNC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Bancorp (FBNC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 5% versus 19% for Simmons First National Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FBNC or SFNC?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), First Bancorp (FBNC) is pulling ahead at 2.
3% versus -56. 7% for Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Bancorp grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -343. 8% for Simmons First National Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FBNC or SFNC?
First Bancorp (FBNC) is the more profitable company, earning 20.
4% net margin versus -63. 4% for Simmons First National Corporation — meaning it keeps 20. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FBNC leads at 26. 6% versus -84. 2% for SFNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FBNC leads at 70. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FBNC or SFNC more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) trades at 10.
5x forward P/E versus 12. 6x for First Bancorp — 2. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FBNC: 6. 6% to $63. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FBNC or SFNC?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Simmons First National Corporation (SFNC) offers the highest yield at 4. 0%, versus 1. 5% for First Bancorp (FBNC).
09Is FBNC or SFNC better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Bancorp (FBNC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
96), 1. 5% yield, +228. 2% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FBNC: +228. 2%, SFNC: +26. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FBNC and SFNC?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FBNC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; SFNC is a small-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.