Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FCBC vs UBSI
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
FCBC vs UBSI — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $825M | $6.06B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $185M | $1.82B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $49M | $465M |
| Gross Margin | 90.3% | 65.4% |
| Operating Margin | 34.0% | 32.4% |
| Forward P/E | 14.9x | 12.0x |
| Total Debt | $1M | $921M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $512M | $2.54B |
FCBC vs UBSI — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| First Community Ban… (FCBC) | 100 | 202.4 | +102.4% |
| United Bankshares, … (UBSI) | 100 | 149.3 | +49.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCBC vs UBSI
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FCBC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 6 yrs, beta 0.66, yield 7.6%
- 166.8% 10Y total return vs UBSI's 52.4%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.66, Low D/E 0.2%, current ratio 0.73x
UBSI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 12.3%, EPS growth 18.9%
- PEG 1.88 vs FCBC's 2.66
- 12.3% NII/revenue growth vs FCBC's 5.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 12.3% NII/revenue growth vs FCBC's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 14.9x), PEG 1.88 vs 2.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FCBC's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.66 vs UBSI's 0.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 7.6% yield, 6-year raise streak, vs UBSI's 3.4% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +28.2% vs FCBC's +17.5% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FCBC's 0.6% |
FCBC vs UBSI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FCBC vs UBSI — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FCBC leads this category, winning 4 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
UBSI is the larger business by revenue, generating $1.8B annually — 9.8x FCBC's $185M. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from 26.3% (FCBC) to 25.5% (UBSI).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $185M | $1.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $67M | $590M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $49M | $465M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $58M | $487M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +90.3% | +65.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +34.0% | +32.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +25.5% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +32.4% | +26.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -4.2% | +30.0% |
Valuation Metrics
UBSI leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.3x trailing earnings, UBSI trades at a 19% valuation discount to FCBC's 16.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), UBSI offers better value at 2.08x vs FCBC's 2.93x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $825M | $6.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $314M | $4.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 16.32x | 13.28x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 14.86x | 11.99x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.93x | 2.08x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 4.97x | 7.53x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.45x | 3.33x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.59x | 1.11x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 13.75x | 12.60x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FCBC leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FCBC delivers a 9.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $9 for UBSI. FCBC carries lower financial leverage with a 0.00x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to UBSI's 0.17x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +9.7% | +8.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.5% | +1.4% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +9.2% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +3.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.00x | 0.17x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$511M | -$1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $512M | $2.5B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $1M | $921M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 3.52x | 1.01x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
FCBC leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FCBC five years ago would be worth $16,842 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,368 for UBSI. Over the past 12 months, UBSI leads with a +28.2% total return vs FCBC's +17.5%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FCBC at 28.3% vs UBSI's 17.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +39.0% | +14.1% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +17.5% | +28.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +111.1% | +61.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +68.4% | +23.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +166.8% | +52.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +28.3% | +17.4% |
Risk & Volatility
FCBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FCBC is the less volatile stock with a 0.66 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than UBSI's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.66x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $45.10 | $45.93 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.21 | $34.10 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +94.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 56 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 80K | 916K |
Analyst Outlook
FCBC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FCBC as "Hold" and UBSI as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 7.5% upside for UBSI (target: $47) vs -12.1% for FCBC (target: $38). For income investors, FCBC offers the higher dividend yield at 7.61% vs UBSI's 3.42%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.00 | $46.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +7.6% | +3.4% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 6 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $3.29 | $1.48 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.2% | +2.1% |
FCBC leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). UBSI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FCBC vs UBSI: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCBC or UBSI a better buy right now?
For growth investors, United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is the stronger pick with 12. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC). United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) offers the better valuation at 13. 3x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC) a "Hold" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FCBC or UBSI?
On trailing P/E, United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is the cheapest at 13. 3x versus First Community Bankshares, Inc. at 16. 3x. On forward P/E, United Bankshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 12. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: United Bankshares, Inc. wins at 1. 88x versus First Community Bankshares, Inc. 's 2. 66x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FCBC or UBSI?
Over the past 5 years, First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) delivered a total return of +68. 4%, compared to +23. 7% for United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCBC returned +166. 8% versus UBSI's +52. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FCBC or UBSI?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 66β versus United Bankshares, Inc. 's 0. 95β — meaning UBSI is approximately 43% more volatile than FCBC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 0% versus 17% for United Bankshares, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FCBC or UBSI?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), United Bankshares, Inc.
(UBSI) is pulling ahead at 12. 3% versus 5. 4% for First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: United Bankshares, Inc. grew EPS 18. 9% year-over-year, compared to -5. 4% for First Community Bankshares, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FCBC or UBSI?
First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) is the more profitable company, earning 26. 3% net margin versus 25. 5% for United Bankshares, Inc. — meaning it keeps 26. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCBC leads at 34. 0% versus 32. 4% for UBSI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FCBC leads at 90. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FCBC or UBSI more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 88x versus First Community Bankshares, Inc. 's 2. 66x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 14. 9x for First Community Bankshares, Inc. — 2. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UBSI: 7. 5% to $46. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — FCBC or UBSI?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Community Bankshares, Inc. (FCBC) offers the highest yield at 7. 6%, versus 3. 4% for United Bankshares, Inc. (UBSI).
09Is FCBC or UBSI better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, First Community Bankshares, Inc.
(FCBC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 66), 7. 6% yield, +166. 8% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCBC: +166. 8%, UBSI: +52. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FCBC and UBSI?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.