FCF vs FNB vs UMBF vs NBTB

For growth investors, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is the stronger pick with 68.

5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 4. 3% for First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (FCF). F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) offers the better valuation at 11. 5x trailing P/E (10. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate F. N. B. Corporation (FNB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, F.

N. B. Corporation (FNB) is the cheapest at 11. 5x versus UMB Financial Corporation at 14. 4x. On forward P/E, UMB Financial Corporation is actually cheaper at 10. 3x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: First Commonwealth Financial Corporation wins at 0. 74x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, F.

N. B. Corporation (FNB) delivered a total return of +50. 2%, compared to +29. 9% for NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: UMBF returned +165. 1% versus FNB's +78. 8%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (FCF) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

72β versus F. N. B. Corporation's 1. 22β — meaning FNB is approximately 70% more volatile than FCF relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 58% for F. N. B. Corporation — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) is pulling ahead at 68.

5% versus 4. 3% for First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (FCF). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: F. N. B. Corporation grew EPS 22. 8% year-over-year, compared to 1. 6% for UMB Financial Corporation. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

F.

N. B. Corporation (FNB) is the more profitable company, earning 21. 0% net margin versus 15. 8% for UMB Financial Corporation — meaning it keeps 21. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FCF leads at 27. 2% versus 20. 3% for UMBF. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (FCF) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 74x versus NBT Bancorp Inc. 's 1. 53x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, UMB Financial Corporation (UMBF) trades at 10. 3x forward P/E versus 10. 8x for NBT Bancorp Inc. — 0. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for UMBF: 14. 7% to $150. 40.

In this comparison, NBTB (3.

2% yield), FCF (2. 9% yield), UMBF (1. 4% yield) pay a dividend. FNB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, First Commonwealth Financial Corporation (FCF) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

72), 2. 9% yield, +160. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCF: +160. 1%, FNB: +78. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FCF is a small-cap deep-value stock; FNB is a small-cap deep-value stock; UMBF is a small-cap high-growth stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock. FCF, UMBF, NBTB pay a dividend while FNB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.