Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FCFS vs V

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FCFS
FirstCash Holdings, Inc

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$9.99B
5Y Perf.+224.5%
V
Visa Inc.

Financial - Credit Services

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$611.60B
5Y Perf.+63.3%

FCFS vs V — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FCFS logoFCFS
V logoV
IndustryFinancial - Credit ServicesFinancial - Credit Services
Market Cap$9.99B$611.60B
Revenue (TTM)$3.66B$40.00B
Net Income (TTM)$354M$22.24B
Gross Margin51.7%80.4%
Operating Margin15.4%60.0%
Forward P/E21.0x24.4x
Total Debt$2.82B$25.17B
Cash & Equiv.$125M$20.15B

FCFS vs VLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FCFS
V
StockMay 20May 26Return
FirstCash Holdings,… (FCFS)100324.5+224.5%
Visa Inc. (V)100163.3+63.3%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FCFS vs V

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: V leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. FirstCash Holdings, Inc is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FCFS
FirstCash Holdings, Inc
The Banking Pick

FCFS is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.

  • 401.1% 10Y total return vs V's 328.6%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.31, current ratio 4.55x
  • PEG 0.89 vs V's 1.54
Best for: long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night
V
Visa Inc.
The Banking Pick

V carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.68, yield 0.7%
  • Rev growth 11.3%, EPS growth 4.8%
  • 11.3% NII/revenue growth vs FCFS's 8.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthV logoV11.3% NII/revenue growth vs FCFS's 8.0%
ValueFCFS logoFCFSLower P/E (21.0x vs 24.4x), PEG 0.89 vs 1.54
Quality / MarginsV logoVEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs FCFS's 0.4% (lower = leaner)
Stability / SafetyFCFS logoFCFSBeta 0.31 vs V's 0.68
DividendsV logoV0.7% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FCFS's 0.7%
Momentum (1Y)FCFS logoFCFS+69.9% vs V's -7.6%
Efficiency (ROA)V logoVEfficiency ratio 0.2% vs FCFS's 0.4%

FCFS vs V — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FCFSFirstCash Holdings, Inc
FY 2025
US Pawn Segment
66.8%$1.8B
Retail POS Payment Solutions
33.2%$870M
VVisa Inc.
FY 2025
Data Processing Revenues
50.0%$20.0B
Service
43.8%$17.5B
International Transaction Revenues
35.4%$14.2B
Service, Other
10.1%$4.1B
Client Incentives
-39.4%$-15,751,000,000

FCFS vs V — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFCFSLAGGINGV

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

V leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

V is the larger business by revenue, generating $40.0B annually — 10.9x FCFS's $3.7B. V is the more profitable business, keeping 50.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCFS's 9.0%.

MetricFCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…V logoVVisa Inc.
RevenueTrailing 12 months$3.7B$40.0B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$950M$27.6B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$354M$22.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$553M$21.2B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+51.7%+80.4%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+15.4%+60.0%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.0%+50.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+12.8%+53.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+29.9%+35.3%
V leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FCFS leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 30.5x trailing earnings, FCFS trades at a 2% valuation discount to V's 31.3x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FCFS offers better value at 1.29x vs V's 1.97x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…V logoVVisa Inc.
Market CapShares × price$10.0B$611.6B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12.7B$616.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS30.51x31.25x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.21.03x24.40x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.29x1.97x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.77x24.46x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue2.73x15.29x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share4.43x16.53x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF21.30x28.35x
FCFS leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

V leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

V delivers a 58.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $59 in annual profit, vs $16 for FCFS. V carries lower financial leverage with a 0.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FCFS's 1.24x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FCFS scores 7/9 vs V's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…V logoVVisa Inc.
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+15.9%+58.9%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+7.0%+22.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+9.2%+29.2%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+12.5%+36.2%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–975
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.24x0.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.7B$5.0B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$125M$20.2B
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.8B$25.2B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.72x26.72x
V leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

FCFS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in FCFS five years ago would be worth $31,559 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $14,202 for V. Over the past 12 months, FCFS leads with a +69.9% total return vs V's -7.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FCFS at 30.6% vs V's 11.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…V logoVVisa Inc.
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+44.7%-7.8%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+69.9%-7.6%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+122.6%+40.2%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+215.6%+42.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+401.1%+328.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+30.6%+11.9%
FCFS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FCFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FCFS is the less volatile stock with a 0.31 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than V's 0.68 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FCFS currently trades 99.5% from its 52-week high vs V's 84.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…V logoVVisa Inc.
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.31x0.68x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$227.42$375.51
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$119.21$293.89
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+99.5%+84.9%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10072.456.8
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded340K7.0M
FCFS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

V leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FCFS as "Hold" and V as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 13.7% upside for V (target: $362) vs 11.3% for FCFS (target: $252). For income investors, V offers the higher dividend yield at 0.74% vs FCFS's 0.70%.

MetricFCFS logoFCFSFirstCash Holding…V logoVVisa Inc.
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$252.00$362.45
# AnalystsCovering analysts1961
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.7%+0.7%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises1015
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.59$2.36
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.2%+2.2%
V leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

V leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FCFS leads in 3 (Valuation Metrics, Total Returns).

Best OverallFirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FCFS vs V: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FCFS or V a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Visa Inc.

(V) is the stronger pick with 11. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 8. 0% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS). FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) offers the better valuation at 30. 5x trailing P/E (21. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Visa Inc. (V) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FCFS or V?

On trailing P/E, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) is the cheapest at 30.

5x versus Visa Inc. at 31. 3x. On forward P/E, FirstCash Holdings, Inc is actually cheaper at 21. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: FirstCash Holdings, Inc wins at 0. 89x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 54x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FCFS or V?

Over the past 5 years, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) delivered a total return of +215.

6%, compared to +42. 0% for Visa Inc. (V). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FCFS returned +401. 1% versus V's +328. 6%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FCFS or V?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) is the lower-risk stock at 0.

31β versus Visa Inc. 's 0. 68β — meaning V is approximately 119% more volatile than FCFS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Visa Inc. (V) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 66% versus 124% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FCFS or V?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Visa Inc.

(V) is pulling ahead at 11. 3% versus 8. 0% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FirstCash Holdings, Inc grew EPS 29. 5% year-over-year, compared to 4. 8% for Visa Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FCFS or V?

Visa Inc.

(V) is the more profitable company, earning 50. 1% net margin versus 9. 0% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc — meaning it keeps 50. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: V leads at 60. 0% versus 15. 4% for FCFS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — V leads at 80. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FCFS or V more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 89x versus Visa Inc. 's 1. 54x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) trades at 21. 0x forward P/E versus 24. 4x for Visa Inc. — 3. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for V: 13. 7% to $362. 45.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FCFS or V?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Visa Inc. (V) offers the highest yield at 0. 7%, versus 0. 7% for FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS).

09

Is FCFS or V better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, FirstCash Holdings, Inc (FCFS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.

31), 0. 7% yield, +401. 1% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FCFS: +401. 1%, V: +328. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FCFS and V?

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FCFS

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

V

Quality Mega-Cap Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 30%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FCFS and V on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FCFS: 8.0% · V: 11.3%)
Net Margin>
%
(FCFS: 9.0% · V: 50.1%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FCFS: 30.5x · V: 31.3x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.