FCUV
Focus Universal Inc.
Hardware, Equipment & Parts
Market Cap$802K
5Y Perf.-99.7%
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FCUV vs LIQT vs POWI vs KOSS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls
Market Cap$22M
5Y Perf.-95.4%
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.
Semiconductors
Market Cap$4.00B
5Y Perf.+35.3%
KOSS
Koss Corporation
Consumer Electronics
Market Cap$40M
5Y Perf.+268.1%
FCUV vs LIQT vs POWI vs KOSS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FCUV | LIQT | POWI | KOSS |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Hardware, Equipment & Parts | Industrial - Pollution & Treatment Controls | Semiconductors | Consumer Electronics |
| Market Cap | $802K | $22M | $4.00B | $40M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $387K | $17M | $446M | $13M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-6M | $-9M | $17M | $-871K |
| Gross Margin | -28.5% | 4.9% | 53.9% | 36.4% |
| Operating Margin | -15.5% | -50.0% | 4.6% | -15.8% |
| Forward P/E | — | — | 58.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $115K | $12M | $0.00 | $3M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $4M | — | $59M | $3M |
FCUV vs LIQT vs POWI vs KOSS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FCUV
LIQT
POWI
KOSS
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) | 100 | 0.3 | -99.7% |
| LiqTech Internation… (LIQT) | 100 | 4.6 | -95.4% |
| Power Integrations,… (POWI) | 100 | 135.3 | +35.3% |
| Koss Corporation (KOSS) | 100 | 368.1 | +268.1% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FCUV vs LIQT vs POWI vs KOSS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: LIQT and POWI are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Power Integrations, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FCUV
Focus Universal Inc.
The Specific-Use Pick
FCUV plays a supporting role in this comparison — it may shine differently against other peers.
Best for: technology exposure
LIQT
LiqTech International, Inc.
The Growth Play
LIQT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 45.7%, 3Y rev CAGR 1.1%
- 13.0% revenue growth vs FCUV's -9.6%
- Beta 0.52 vs POWI's 2.08
- +64.8% vs FCUV's -97.6%
Best for: growth exposure
POWI
Power Integrations, Inc.
The Income Pick
POWI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and long-term compounding is your priority.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 2.08, yield 1.2%
- 232.7% 10Y total return vs KOSS's 91.0%
- 3.7% margin vs FCUV's -15.2%
- 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
KOSS
Koss Corporation
The Defensive Pick
KOSS is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.62, Low D/E 8.3%, current ratio 11.65x
- Beta 1.62, current ratio 11.65x
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | LIQT | 13.0% revenue growth vs FCUV's -9.6% |
| Quality / Margins | POWI | 3.7% margin vs FCUV's -15.2% |
| Stability / Safety | LIQT | Beta 0.52 vs POWI's 2.08 |
| Dividends | POWI | 1.2% yield; 18-year raise streak; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | LIQT | +64.8% vs FCUV's -97.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | POWI | 2.1% ROA vs FCUV's -253.0%, ROIC 2.4% vs -229.8% |
FCUV vs LIQT vs POWI vs KOSS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2023
FY 2024
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FCUV vs LIQT vs POWI vs KOSS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLPOWILAGGINGKOSS
Who Leads Where
POWI leads in 4 of 6 categories
FCUV leads 0 • LIQT leads 0 • KOSS leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓KOSSKoss Corporation
0leads
LIQTLiqTech International…
0leads
FCUVFocus Universal Inc.
0leads
POWIPower Integrations, I…
4leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FCUVvs LIQTMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
POWI4/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
POWI7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
POWI3/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
POWI1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
POWI is the larger business by revenue, generating $446M annually — 1151.8x FCUV's $387,457. POWI is the more profitable business, keeping 3.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FCUV's -15.2%. On growth, LIQT holds the edge at +53.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FCUVFocus Universal I… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | POWIPower Integration… | KOSSKoss Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $387,457 | $17M | $446M | $13M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$6M | -$6M | $41M | -$2M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$6M | -$9M | $17M | -$871,116 |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$5M | -$7M | $85M | -$546,651 |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | -28.5% | +4.9% | +53.9% | +36.4% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -15.5% | -50.0% | +4.6% | -15.8% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -15.2% | -53.3% | +3.7% | -6.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.2% | -39.3% | +18.9% | -4.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -61.3% | +53.6% | +2.6% | -19.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -180.0% | +69.4% | -60.0% | — |
POWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FCUV and LIQT and KOSS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | FCUVFocus Universal I… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | POWIPower Integration… | KOSSKoss Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $801,964 | $22M | $4.0B | $40M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | -$3M | $34M | $3.9B | $39M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -0.23x | -2.59x | 184.18x | -44.78x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — | 58.74x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — | 79.69x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.01x | 1.35x | 9.02x | 3.14x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.23x | 2.14x | 6.01x | 1.28x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — | 45.93x | — |
Evenly matched — FCUV and LIQT and KOSS each lead in 1 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POWI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
POWI delivers a 2.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-4 for FCUV. FCUV carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LIQT's 1.17x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), POWI scores 6/9 vs LIQT's 2/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FCUVFocus Universal I… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | POWIPower Integration… | KOSSKoss Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -3.9% | -70.0% | +2.4% | -2.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.5% | -29.5% | +2.1% | -2.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -2.3% | -31.1% | +2.4% | -4.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -180.2% | — | +2.9% | -4.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.04x | 1.17x | — | 0.08x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$3M | $12M | -$59M | -$266,063 |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $4M | — | $59M | $3M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $114,820 | $12M | $0 | $3M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -69.59x | -13.46x | — | -1972.72x |
POWI leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
POWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in POWI five years ago would be worth $9,165 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for FCUV. Over the past 12 months, LIQT leads with a +64.8% total return vs FCUV's -97.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors KOSS at 1.7% vs FCUV's -82.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FCUVFocus Universal I… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | POWIPower Integration… | KOSSKoss Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -87.2% | +54.9% | +93.2% | -3.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -97.6% | +64.8% | +44.4% | -10.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.5% | -31.3% | -6.3% | +5.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -99.7% | -96.1% | -8.3% | -75.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -98.9% | -90.9% | +232.7% | +91.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -82.5% | -11.8% | -2.2% | +1.7% |
POWI leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — LIQT and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
LIQT is the less volatile stock with a 0.52 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than POWI's 2.08 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. POWI currently trades 91.0% from its 52-week high vs FCUV's 2.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FCUVFocus Universal I… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | POWIPower Integration… | KOSSKoss Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.55x | 0.54x | 2.11x | 1.58x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $53.70 | $3.35 | $78.94 | $8.59 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.74 | $1.30 | $30.86 | $3.50 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +2.0% | +68.9% | +91.0% | +48.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 30.3 | 57.0 | 76.1 | 55.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.1M | 50K | 967K | 23K |
Evenly matched — LIQT and POWI each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
POWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
POWI is the only dividend payer here at 1.17% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FCUVFocus Universal I… | LIQTLiqTech Internati… | POWIPower Integration… | KOSSKoss Corporation |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | — | Buy | — |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | — | $79.00 | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | — | 16 | — |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | +1.2% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | 18 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | $0.84 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +83.5% | 0.0% | +2.5% | 0.0% |
POWI leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
POWI leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
Best OverallPower Integrations, Inc. (POWI)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FCUV vs LIQT vs POWI vs KOSS: Key Questions Answered
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FCUV or LIQT or POWI or KOSS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 6% for Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV). Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) offers the better valuation at 184. 2x trailing P/E (58. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Power Integrations, Inc. (POWI) a "Buy" — based on 16 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FCUV or LIQT or POWI or KOSS?
Over the past 5 years, Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) delivered a total return of -8. 3%, compared to -99. 7% for Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: POWI returned +239. 0% versus FCUV's -99. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FCUV or LIQT or POWI or KOSS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 54β versus Power Integrations, Inc. 's 2. 11β — meaning POWI is approximately 292% more volatile than LIQT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 117% for LiqTech International, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FCUV or LIQT or POWI or KOSS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -9. 6% for Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: LiqTech International, Inc. grew EPS 45. 7% year-over-year, compared to -30. 4% for Power Integrations, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, LIQT leads at 1. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FCUV or LIQT or POWI or KOSS?
Power Integrations, Inc.
(POWI) is the more profitable company, earning 5. 0% net margin versus -803. 8% for Focus Universal Inc. — meaning it keeps 5. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: POWI leads at 4. 8% versus -1557. 3% for FCUV. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — POWI leads at 54. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FCUV or LIQT or POWI or KOSS?
In this comparison, POWI (1.
2% yield) pays a dividend. FCUV, LIQT, KOSS do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
07Is FCUV or LIQT or POWI or KOSS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, LiqTech International, Inc.
(LIQT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 54)). Focus Universal Inc. (FCUV) carries a higher beta of 1. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (LIQT: -91. 0%, FCUV: -99. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FCUV and LIQT and POWI and KOSS?
These companies operate in different sectors (FCUV (Technology) and LIQT (Industrials) and POWI (Technology) and KOSS (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
POWI pays a dividend while FCUV, LIQT, KOSS do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FCUV: -61.3% · LIQT: 53.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.