Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FDSB vs DCOM vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FDSB vs DCOM vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $84M | $1.64B | $2.35B | $203M | $858M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $19M | $730M | $867M | $90M | $278M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $4M | $111M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Gross Margin | 58.5% | 56.1% | 72.1% | 54.7% | 67.1% |
| Operating Margin | -7.4% | 21.5% | 25.3% | 7.0% | 29.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 10.7x | 10.8x | 11.8x | 16.9x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $371M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $38M | $2.35B | $185M | $119M | $51M |
FDSB vs DCOM vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fifth District Savi… (FDSB) | 100 | 144.7 | +44.7% |
| Dime Community Banc… (DCOM) | 100 | 143.3 | +43.3% |
| NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) | 100 | 92.1 | -7.9% |
| Citizens Community … (CZWI) | 100 | 157.3 | +57.3% |
| TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) | 100 | 139.0 | +39.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FDSB vs DCOM vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FDSB is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if stability is your priority.
- Beta 0.19 vs DCOM's 1.05
DCOM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 13.0%, EPS growth 330.9%
- 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4%
- Lower P/E (10.7x vs 16.9x), PEG 1.68 vs 4.66
- Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FDSB's 0.7% (lower = leaner)
NBTB ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and valuation efficiency.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 0.89, yield 3.2%
- PEG 1.53 vs TRST's 4.66
- Beta 0.89, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.60x
- NIM 3.1% vs FDSB's 1.9%
CZWI is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 157.0% 10Y total return vs NBTB's 102.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.46, Low D/E 27.6%, current ratio 3015.31x
TRST is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 13.0% NII/revenue growth vs CZWI's -9.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (10.7x vs 16.9x), PEG 1.68 vs 4.66 | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FDSB's 0.7% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs DCOM's 1.05 | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 12-year raise streak, vs DCOM's 2.7%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +60.3% vs NBTB's +9.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FDSB's 0.7% |
FDSB vs DCOM vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FDSB vs DCOM vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories
DCOM leads 1 • CZWI leads 1 • FDSB leads 0 • TRST leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — NBTB and TRST each lead in 2 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
NBTB is the larger business by revenue, generating $867M annually — 45.0x FDSB's $19M. TRST is the more profitable business, keeping 22.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FDSB's -5.6%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $19M | $730M | $867M | $90M | $278M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $4M | $161M | $241M | $9M | $90M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $4M | $111M | $169M | $14M | $61M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $648,000 | $182M | $225M | $11M | $46M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +58.5% | +56.1% | +72.1% | +54.7% | +67.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -7.4% | +21.5% | +25.3% | +7.0% | +29.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -5.6% | +15.2% | +19.5% | +16.0% | +22.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -8.1% | +25.0% | +25.2% | +11.5% | +16.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +144.5% | +2.3% | +39.5% | +63.0% | +44.1% |
Valuation Metrics
DCOM leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 13.5x trailing earnings, NBTB trades at a 14% valuation discount to DCOM's 15.7x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), NBTB offers better value at 1.92x vs TRST's 4.11x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $84M | $1.6B | $2.4B | $203M | $858M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $46M | -$341M | $2.5B | $136M | $1000M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -72.43x | 15.73x | 13.53x | 14.44x | 14.90x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 10.72x | 10.80x | 11.78x | 16.87x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.47x | 1.92x | 2.85x | 4.11x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | -2.18x | 10.35x | 15.28x | 11.14x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.36x | 2.25x | 2.71x | 2.25x | 3.08x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.62x | 1.09x | 1.21x | 1.09x | 1.29x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 9.00x | 10.75x | 19.55x | 18.75x |
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB leads this category, winning 5 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
NBTB delivers a 9.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $10 in annual profit, vs $3 for FDSB. NBTB carries lower financial leverage with a 0.17x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to TRST's 0.28x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), DCOM scores 8/9 vs FDSB's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.8% | +7.7% | +9.5% | +7.8% | +8.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +0.7% | +0.8% | +1.1% | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.0% | +5.6% | +7.9% | +2.0% | +7.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -1.3% | +6.1% | +2.4% | +0.6% | +2.8% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 8 | 7 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.25x | 0.17x | 0.28x | 0.28x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$38M | -$2.0B | $142M | -$67M | $142M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $38M | $2.4B | $185M | $119M | $51M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $371M | $327M | $52M | $193M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.40x | 0.57x | 1.05x | 0.16x | 0.90x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
CZWI leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in CZWI five years ago would be worth $17,124 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,266 for DCOM. Over the past 12 months, TRST leads with a +60.3% total return vs NBTB's +9.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CZWI at 37.5% vs FDSB's 14.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +1.5% | +26.4% | +9.3% | +21.5% | +18.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +22.7% | +46.6% | +9.0% | +45.6% | +60.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +129.1% | +54.1% | +160.0% | +88.2% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +22.7% | +29.9% | +71.2% | +46.5% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +48.4% | +68.6% | +102.2% | +157.0% | +97.2% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.1% | +31.8% | +15.5% | +37.5% | +23.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FDSB and TRST each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FDSB is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than DCOM's 1.05 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. TRST currently trades 98.6% from its 52-week high vs CZWI's 93.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.19x | 1.05x | 0.89x | 0.46x | 0.75x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $15.64 | $37.87 | $46.92 | $22.62 | $49.11 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $11.70 | $24.57 | $39.20 | $12.83 | $30.17 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +97.3% | +98.4% | +96.1% | +93.2% | +98.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 59.9 | 60.5 | 57.3 | 63.7 | 64.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 6K | 271K | 236K | 40K | 112K |
Analyst Outlook
NBTB leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: DCOM as "Hold", NBTB as "Hold", CZWI as "Buy", TRST as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 6.0% upside for DCOM (target: $40) vs 2.1% for NBTB (target: $46). For income investors, NBTB offers the higher dividend yield at 3.17% vs CZWI's 1.76%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Hold | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $39.50 | $46.00 | — | — |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 10 | 2 | 3 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +2.7% | +3.2% | +1.8% | +3.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 3 | 12 | 7 | 8 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 | $1.43 | $0.37 | $1.51 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% | +0.4% | +3.1% | +4.4% |
NBTB leads in 2 of 6 categories (Profitability & Efficiency, Analyst Outlook). DCOM leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 2 tied.
FDSB vs DCOM vs NBTB vs CZWI vs TRST: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FDSB or DCOM or NBTB or CZWI or TRST a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is the stronger pick with 13. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) offers the better valuation at 13. 5x trailing P/E (10. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI) a "Buy" — based on 2 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FDSB or DCOM or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
On trailing P/E, NBT Bancorp Inc.
(NBTB) is the cheapest at 13. 5x versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. at 15. 7x. On forward P/E, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 7x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: NBT Bancorp Inc. wins at 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x — a reasonable growth-adjusted valuation.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FDSB or DCOM or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
Over the past 5 years, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) delivered a total return of +71. 2%, compared to +22. 7% for Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CZWI returned +157. 0% versus FDSB's +48. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FDSB or DCOM or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fifth District Savings Bank (FDSB) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. 's 1. 05β — meaning DCOM is approximately 443% more volatile than FDSB relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 17% versus 28% for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FDSB or DCOM or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Dime Community Bancshares, Inc.
(DCOM) is pulling ahead at 13. 0% versus -9. 4% for Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc. (CZWI). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. grew EPS 330. 9% year-over-year, compared to -250. 0% for Fifth District Savings Bank. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FDSB or DCOM or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
TrustCo Bank Corp NY (TRST) is the more profitable company, earning 22.
0% net margin versus -5. 6% for Fifth District Savings Bank — meaning it keeps 22. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: TRST leads at 29. 2% versus -7. 4% for FDSB. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NBTB leads at 72. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FDSB or DCOM or NBTB or CZWI or TRST more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, NBT Bancorp Inc. (NBTB) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 1. 53x versus TrustCo Bank Corp NY's 4. 66x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Dime Community Bancshares, Inc. (DCOM) trades at 10. 7x forward P/E versus 16. 9x for TrustCo Bank Corp NY — 6. 2x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for DCOM: 6. 0% to $39. 50.
08Which pays a better dividend — FDSB or DCOM or NBTB or CZWI or TRST?
In this comparison, NBTB (3.
2% yield), TRST (3. 1% yield), DCOM (2. 7% yield), CZWI (1. 8% yield) pay a dividend. FDSB does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FDSB or DCOM or NBTB or CZWI or TRST better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Citizens Community Bancorp, Inc.
(CZWI) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 46), 1. 8% yield, +157. 0% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (CZWI: +157. 0%, DCOM: +68. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FDSB and DCOM and NBTB and CZWI and TRST?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FDSB is a small-cap quality compounder stock; DCOM is a small-cap deep-value stock; NBTB is a small-cap deep-value stock; CZWI is a small-cap deep-value stock; TRST is a small-cap deep-value stock. DCOM, NBTB, CZWI, TRST pay a dividend while FDSB does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.