Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FEBO vs HKIT vs CODA vs BTBT vs AIXI

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FEBO
Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Consumer Electronics

TechnologyNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap$12M
5Y Perf.-75.0%
HKIT
Hitek Global Inc.

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$427K
5Y Perf.-98.8%
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

Aerospace & Defense

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$134M
5Y Perf.+100.7%
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.

Financial - Capital Markets

Financial ServicesNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$589M
5Y Perf.-29.1%
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation

Software - Application

TechnologyNASDAQ • CN
Market Cap$8M
5Y Perf.-96.4%

FEBO vs HKIT vs CODA vs BTBT vs AIXI — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FEBO logoFEBO
HKIT logoHKIT
CODA logoCODA
BTBT logoBTBT
AIXI logoAIXI
IndustryConsumer ElectronicsSoftware - ApplicationAerospace & DefenseFinancial - Capital MarketsSoftware - Application
Market Cap$12M$427K$134M$589M$8M
Revenue (TTM)$148M$9M$28M$164M$115M
Net Income (TTM)$-1M$-717K$4M$137M$-53M
Gross Margin18.4%14.9%66.3%61.9%64.3%
Operating Margin0.0%-37.5%17.4%16.8%-44.2%
Forward P/E0.7x22.5x9.2x
Total Debt$26M$3M$395K$14M$46M
Cash & Equiv.$27M$4M$29M$95M$847K

FEBO vs HKIT vs CODA vs BTBT vs AIXILong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FEBO
HKIT
CODA
BTBT
AIXI
StockNov 23May 26Return
Fenbo Holdings Limi… (FEBO)10025.0-75.0%
Hitek Global Inc. (HKIT)1001.2-98.8%
Coda Octopus Group,… (CODA)100200.7+100.7%
Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT)10070.9-29.1%
Xiao-I Corporation (AIXI)1003.6-96.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FEBO vs HKIT vs CODA vs BTBT vs AIXI

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: BTBT leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Hitek Global Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for valuation and capital efficiency and capital preservation and lower volatility. CODA also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 3 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FEBO
Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares
The Lower-Volatility Pick

FEBO lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.

Best for: technology exposure
HKIT
Hitek Global Inc.
The Defensive Pick

HKIT is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.

  • Lower volatility, beta 0.70, Low D/E 7.3%, current ratio 8.23x
  • Beta 0.70, current ratio 8.23x
  • Better valuation composite
  • Beta 0.70 vs BTBT's 3.37
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
CODA
Coda Octopus Group, Inc.
The Income Pick

CODA ranks third and is worth considering specifically for income & stability and long-term compounding.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.00
  • 8.4% 10Y total return vs BTBT's -60.4%
  • +78.9% vs HKIT's -98.8%
Best for: income & stability and long-term compounding
BTBT
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Banking Pick

BTBT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 264.6%, EPS growth 225.0%
  • 264.6% NII/revenue growth vs FEBO's 11.9%
  • 17.3% margin vs AIXI's -45.9%
  • 0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Best for: growth exposure
AIXI
Xiao-I Corporation
The Technology Pick

Among these 5 stocks, AIXI doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: technology exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthBTBT logoBTBT264.6% NII/revenue growth vs FEBO's 11.9%
ValueHKIT logoHKITBetter valuation composite
Quality / MarginsBTBT logoBTBT17.3% margin vs AIXI's -45.9%
Stability / SafetyHKIT logoHKITBeta 0.70 vs BTBT's 3.37
DividendsBTBT logoBTBT0.3% yield; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
Momentum (1Y)CODA logoCODA+78.9% vs HKIT's -98.8%
Efficiency (ROA)BTBT logoBTBT19.0% ROA vs AIXI's -65.3%, ROIC 6.5% vs -34.4%

FEBO vs HKIT vs CODA vs BTBT vs AIXI — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FEBOFenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

HKITHitek Global Inc.
FY 2024
Software Member
100.0%$823,747
CODACoda Octopus Group, Inc.
FY 2025
Equipment Sales
71.3%$14M
Service
17.3%$4M
Equipment Rentals
7.3%$1M
Software Sales
4.0%$811,912
BTBTBit Digital, Inc.
FY 2024
Other Member
100.0%$550,260
AIXIXiao-I Corporation
FY 2024
Technology Service
94.5%$24M
Hardware Products Member
5.5%$1M

FEBO vs HKIT vs CODA vs BTBT vs AIXI — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFEBOLAGGINGAIXI

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

BTBT is the larger business by revenue, generating $164M annually — 17.3x HKIT's $9M. BTBT is the more profitable business, keeping 17.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to AIXI's -45.9%. On growth, HKIT holds the edge at +4.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFEBO logoFEBOFenbo Holdings Li…HKIT logoHKITHitek Global Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
RevenueTrailing 12 months$148M$9M$28M$164M$115M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$550,285-$3M$6M$166M-$49M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit-$1M-$716,547$4M$137M-$53M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$9M-$2M$7M-$448M-$2M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+18.4%+14.9%+66.3%+61.9%+64.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+0.0%-37.5%+17.4%+16.8%-44.2%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue-0.9%-7.6%+14.8%+17.3%-45.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.4%-23.8%+24.6%-65.3%-2.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-47.9%+4.4%+28.8%-64.9%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-101.2%+198.4%+3.0%+2.8%-29.9%
CODA leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

HKIT leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

At 0.7x trailing earnings, HKIT trades at a 98% valuation discount to CODA's 32.2x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, BTBT's 8.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than CODA's 17.9x.

MetricFEBO logoFEBOFenbo Holdings Li…HKIT logoHKITHitek Global Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
Market CapShares × price$12M$426,774$134M$589M$8M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$12M-$539,760$106M$508M$53M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS-6.17x0.73x32.16x9.15x-0.45x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.22.45x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate7.51x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple17.85x8.49x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.72x0.07x5.05x3.60x0.11x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.10x0.00x2.30x0.56x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF22.20x
HKIT leads this category, winning 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

Evenly matched — CODA and BTBT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

BTBT delivers a 21.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $21 in annual profit, vs $-2 for HKIT. CODA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.01x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FEBO's 0.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), CODA scores 7/9 vs AIXI's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFEBO logoFEBOFenbo Holdings Li…HKIT logoHKITHitek Global Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
ROE (TTM)Return on equity-0.3%-2.1%+7.2%+21.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets-1.3%-1.7%+6.6%+19.0%-65.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital-7.7%-4.1%+11.2%+6.5%-34.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed-25.0%-4.7%+8.1%+8.5%-3.4%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–954764
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.58x0.07x0.01x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$1M-$966,534-$28M-$81M$45M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$27M$4M$29M$95M$846,593
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$26M$3M$394,932$14M$46M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense-0.00x-7.64x-14.13x
Evenly matched — CODA and BTBT each lead in 4 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in CODA five years ago would be worth $14,969 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $26 for HKIT. Over the past 12 months, CODA leads with a +78.9% total return vs HKIT's -98.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors CODA at 10.4% vs HKIT's -86.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFEBO logoFEBOFenbo Holdings Li…HKIT logoHKITHitek Global Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-8.3%-99.4%+25.1%-10.3%+68.1%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-16.5%-98.8%+78.9%-9.0%-79.2%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.0%-99.8%+34.5%-19.7%-98.6%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.0%-99.7%+49.7%-84.6%-98.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-75.0%-99.7%+844.4%-60.4%-98.6%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-37.0%-86.8%+10.4%-7.1%-75.9%
CODA leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

FEBO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

FEBO is the less volatile stock with a -0.06 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BTBT's 3.37 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FEBO currently trades 74.5% from its 52-week high vs HKIT's 0.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFEBO logoFEBOFenbo Holdings Li…HKIT logoHKITHitek Global Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500-0.06x0.70x1.00x3.37x0.94x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$1.49$209.00$17.28$4.55$4.02
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.61$0.67$5.98$1.25$0.08
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+74.5%+0.3%+68.9%+40.2%+18.0%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10046.422.048.669.149.3
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded9K1.1M256K18.5M60.6M
FEBO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FEBO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.

Analyst consensus: CODA as "Buy", BTBT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 173.2% upside for BTBT (target: $5) vs 17.6% for CODA (target: $14). BTBT is the only dividend payer here at 0.31% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.

MetricFEBO logoFEBOFenbo Holdings Li…HKIT logoHKITHitek Global Inc.CODA logoCODACoda Octopus Grou…BTBT logoBTBTBit Digital, Inc.AIXI logoAIXIXiao-I Corporation
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$14.00$5.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts12
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+0.3%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises200
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.01
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%0.0%
FEBO leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway

CODA leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FEBO leads in 2 (Risk & Volatility, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallFenbo Holdings Limited Ordi… (FEBO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FEBO vs HKIT vs CODA vs BTBT vs AIXI: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FEBO or HKIT or CODA or BTBT or AIXI a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the stronger pick with 264. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 11. 9% for Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO). Hitek Global Inc. (HKIT) offers the better valuation at 0. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) a "Buy" — based on 1 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FEBO or HKIT or CODA or BTBT or AIXI?

On trailing P/E, Hitek Global Inc.

(HKIT) is the cheapest at 0. 7x versus Coda Octopus Group, Inc. at 32. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FEBO or HKIT or CODA or BTBT or AIXI?

Over the past 5 years, Coda Octopus Group, Inc.

(CODA) delivered a total return of +49. 7%, compared to -99. 7% for Hitek Global Inc. (HKIT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: CODA returned +844. 4% versus HKIT's -99. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FEBO or HKIT or CODA or BTBT or AIXI?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) is the lower-risk stock at -0.

06β versus Bit Digital, Inc. 's 3. 37β — meaning BTBT is approximately -5536% more volatile than FEBO relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 1% versus 58% for Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FEBO or HKIT or CODA or BTBT or AIXI?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is pulling ahead at 264. 6% versus 11. 9% for Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bit Digital, Inc. grew EPS 225. 0% year-over-year, compared to -38. 2% for Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares. Over a 3-year CAGR, AIXI leads at 29. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FEBO or HKIT or CODA or BTBT or AIXI?

Bit Digital, Inc.

(BTBT) is the more profitable company, earning 17. 3% net margin versus -20. 6% for Xiao-I Corporation — meaning it keeps 17. 3% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: CODA leads at 17. 1% versus -27. 4% for HKIT. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AIXI leads at 68. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FEBO or HKIT or CODA or BTBT or AIXI more undervalued right now?

Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BTBT: 173.

2% to $5. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FEBO or HKIT or CODA or BTBT or AIXI?

In this comparison, BTBT (0.

3% yield) pays a dividend. FEBO, HKIT, CODA, AIXI do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FEBO or HKIT or CODA or BTBT or AIXI better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Fenbo Holdings Limited Ordinary Shares (FEBO) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0.

06)). Bit Digital, Inc. (BTBT) carries a higher beta of 3. 37 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FEBO: -75. 0%, BTBT: -60. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FEBO and HKIT and CODA and BTBT and AIXI?

These companies operate in different sectors (FEBO (Technology) and HKIT (Technology) and CODA (Industrials) and BTBT (Financial Services) and AIXI (Technology)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FEBO is a small-cap quality compounder stock; HKIT is a small-cap high-growth stock; CODA is a small-cap high-growth stock; BTBT is a small-cap high-growth stock; AIXI is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FEBO

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

HKIT

High-Growth Disruptor

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $20B
  • Revenue Growth > 220%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

CODA

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Industrials
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 14%
  • Net Margin > 8%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

BTBT

High-Growth Compounder

  • Sector: Financial Services
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 132%
  • Net Margin > 10%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

AIXI

Quality Business

  • Sector: Technology
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Gross Margin > 38%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FEBO and HKIT and CODA and BTBT and AIXI on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FEBO: -47.9% · HKIT: 440.9%)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.