Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FEIM vs MTSI vs LITE vs VSAT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Semiconductors
Communication Equipment
Communication Equipment
FEIM vs MTSI vs LITE vs VSAT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Semiconductors | Communication Equipment | Communication Equipment |
| Market Cap | $536M | $25.84B | $63.74B | $8.64B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $70M | $1.07B | $2.49B | $4.62B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $21M | $177M | $440M | $-185M |
| Gross Margin | 39.2% | 55.3% | 37.7% | 48.8% |
| Operating Margin | 12.6% | 16.0% | 9.5% | -1.0% |
| Forward P/E | 74.1x | 76.9x | 114.4x | — |
| Total Debt | $9M | $538M | $2.61B | $7.52B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $112M | $521M | $1.61B |
FEIM vs MTSI vs LITE vs VSAT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Frequency Electroni… (FEIM) | 100 | 671.7 | +571.7% |
| MACOM Technology So… (MTSI) | 100 | 1084.9 | +984.9% |
| Lumentum Holdings I… (LITE) | 100 | 1217.7 | +1117.7% |
| Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) | 100 | 157.9 | +57.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FEIM vs MTSI vs LITE vs VSAT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FEIM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 2.17, yield 1.8%
- Rev growth 26.3%, EPS growth 316.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 13.1%
- Better valuation composite
- 30.1% margin vs VSAT's -4.0%
MTSI is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if sleep-well-at-night and defensive is your priority.
- Lower volatility, beta 1.75, Low D/E 40.5%, current ratio 3.71x
- Beta 1.75, current ratio 3.71x
- 32.6% revenue growth vs VSAT's 5.5%
- Beta 1.75 vs VSAT's 2.92, lower leverage
LITE is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 36.4% 10Y total return vs MTSI's 8.0%
- +12.5% vs MTSI's +203.8%
VSAT lags the leaders in this set but could rank higher in a more targeted comparison.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 32.6% revenue growth vs VSAT's 5.5% | |
| Value | Better valuation composite | |
| Quality / Margins | 30.1% margin vs VSAT's -4.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.75 vs VSAT's 2.92, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 1.8% yield; the other 3 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +12.5% vs MTSI's +203.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 23.0% ROA vs VSAT's -3.6%, ROIC 20.1% vs -0.7% |
FEIM vs MTSI vs LITE vs VSAT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FEIM vs MTSI vs LITE vs VSAT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
VSAT leads in 1 of 6 categories
FEIM leads 1 • LITE leads 1 • MTSI leads 1 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — MTSI and LITE each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
VSAT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.6B annually — 66.1x FEIM's $70M. FEIM is the more profitable business, keeping 30.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to VSAT's -4.0%. On growth, LITE holds the edge at +90.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $70M | $1.1B | $2.5B | $4.6B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $9M | $210M | $425M | $1.3B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $21M | $177M | $440M | -$185M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$6M | $168M | $399M | $907M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +39.2% | +55.3% | +37.7% | +48.8% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +12.6% | +16.0% | +9.5% | -1.0% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +30.1% | +16.5% | +17.7% | -4.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -9.1% | +15.6% | +16.0% | +19.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.3% | +22.5% | +90.1% | +3.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -35.7% | +42.9% | +3.3% | +173.2% |
Valuation Metrics
VSAT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 22.3x trailing earnings, FEIM trades at a 99% valuation discount to LITE's 2412.9x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, VSAT's 11.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than LITE's 859.4x.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $536M | $25.8B | $63.7B | $8.6B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $540M | $26.3B | $65.8B | $14.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 22.28x | -471.88x | 2412.94x | -14.81x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 74.07x | 76.91x | 114.43x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 39.15x | 136.13x | 859.43x | 11.51x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 7.67x | 26.71x | 38.75x | 1.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 9.47x | 19.20x | 54.76x | 1.86x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 134.01x | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FEIM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FEIM delivers a 37.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $38 in annual profit, vs $-4 for VSAT. FEIM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LITE's 2.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), LITE scores 7/9 vs VSAT's 5/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +37.9% | +13.2% | +30.7% | -4.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +23.0% | +8.6% | +8.5% | -3.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +20.1% | +6.0% | -4.3% | -0.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +17.0% | +7.6% | -4.8% | -0.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.16x | 0.41x | 2.30x | 1.62x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $4M | $426M | $2.1B | $5.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $112M | $521M | $1.6B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $9M | $538M | $2.6B | $7.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 123.86x | 391.47x | 9.62x | 6.37x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
LITE leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in LITE five years ago would be worth $107,656 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $13,378 for VSAT. Over the past 12 months, LITE leads with a +1247.8% total return vs MTSI's +203.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LITE at 165.2% vs VSAT's 21.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +8.4% | +96.9% | +131.2% | +76.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +220.2% | +203.8% | +1247.8% | +614.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +757.3% | +526.9% | +1764.2% | +80.1% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +471.5% | +513.6% | +976.6% | +33.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +473.8% | +795.9% | +3635.5% | -12.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +104.7% | +84.4% | +165.2% | +21.7% |
Risk & Volatility
MTSI leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
MTSI is the less volatile stock with a 1.75 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than VSAT's 2.92 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MTSI currently trades 97.0% from its 52-week high vs LITE's 87.4% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.17x | 1.75x | 2.69x | 2.92x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $61.47 | $355.00 | $1021.00 | $68.92 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $16.77 | $110.09 | $60.38 | $8.61 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.2% | +97.0% | +87.4% | +96.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 57.4 | 71.3 | 58.8 | 67.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 181K | 1.1M | 6.4M | 1.5M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FEIM as "Hold", MTSI as "Buy", LITE as "Buy", VSAT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply -13.1% upside for VSAT (target: $58) vs -28.0% for LITE (target: $643). FEIM is the only dividend payer here at 1.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $44.00 | $254.00 | $643.18 | $57.67 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 2 | 23 | 24 | 20 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +1.8% | — | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.00 | — | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | +0.2% | +0.1% | +0.1% |
VSAT leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). FEIM leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 1 tied.
FEIM vs MTSI vs LITE vs VSAT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FEIM or MTSI or LITE or VSAT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the stronger pick with 32. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 5% for Viasat, Inc. (VSAT). Frequency Electronics, Inc. (FEIM) offers the better valuation at 22. 3x trailing P/E (74. 1x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc. (MTSI) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FEIM or MTSI or LITE or VSAT?
On trailing P/E, Frequency Electronics, Inc.
(FEIM) is the cheapest at 22. 3x versus Lumentum Holdings Inc. at 2412. 9x. On forward P/E, Frequency Electronics, Inc. is actually cheaper at 74. 1x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FEIM or MTSI or LITE or VSAT?
Over the past 5 years, Lumentum Holdings Inc.
(LITE) delivered a total return of +976. 6%, compared to +33. 8% for Viasat, Inc. (VSAT). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LITE returned +36. 4% versus VSAT's -12. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FEIM or MTSI or LITE or VSAT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 75β versus Viasat, Inc. 's 2. 92β — meaning VSAT is approximately 67% more volatile than MTSI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Frequency Electronics, Inc. (FEIM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 2% for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FEIM or MTSI or LITE or VSAT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.
(MTSI) is pulling ahead at 32. 6% versus 5. 5% for Viasat, Inc. (VSAT). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Frequency Electronics, Inc. grew EPS 316. 9% year-over-year, compared to -170. 2% for MACOM Technology Solutions Holdings, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, VSAT leads at 23. 2% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FEIM or MTSI or LITE or VSAT?
Frequency Electronics, Inc.
(FEIM) is the more profitable company, earning 34. 1% net margin versus -12. 7% for Viasat, Inc. — meaning it keeps 34. 1% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FEIM leads at 16. 8% versus -10. 9% for LITE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MTSI leads at 54. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FEIM or MTSI or LITE or VSAT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Frequency Electronics, Inc.
(FEIM) trades at 74. 1x forward P/E versus 114. 4x for Lumentum Holdings Inc. — 40. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for VSAT: -13. 1% to $57. 67.
08Which pays a better dividend — FEIM or MTSI or LITE or VSAT?
In this comparison, FEIM (1.
8% yield) pays a dividend. MTSI, LITE, VSAT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FEIM or MTSI or LITE or VSAT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Frequency Electronics, Inc.
(FEIM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (1. 8% yield, +473. 8% 10Y return). Viasat, Inc. (VSAT) carries a higher beta of 2. 92 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FEIM: +473. 8%, VSAT: -12. 1%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FEIM and MTSI and LITE and VSAT?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FEIM is a small-cap high-growth stock; MTSI is a mid-cap high-growth stock; LITE is a mid-cap high-growth stock; VSAT is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FEIM pays a dividend while MTSI, LITE, VSAT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.