Biotechnology
Compare Stocks
5 / 10Stock Comparison
FENC vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRGO vs PTCT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic
Biotechnology
FENC vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRGO vs PTCT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology | Drug Manufacturers - Specialty & Generic | Biotechnology |
| Market Cap | $194M | $2.97B | $3.84B | $1.62B | $6.11B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $39M | $777M | $1.10B | $4.18B | $827M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-7M | $-29M | $376M | $-1.82B | $-187M |
| Gross Margin | 93.1% | 89.4% | 91.5% | 34.2% | 49.7% |
| Operating Margin | -12.0% | -5.5% | 7.4% | -4.1% | -8.3% |
| Forward P/E | 54.3x | 20.8x | 55.6x | 5.5x | 9.5x |
| Total Debt | $19M | $41M | $52M | $3.97B | $492M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $27M | $128M | $178M | $532M | $985M |
FENC vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRGO vs PTCT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fennec Pharmaceutic… (FENC) | 100 | 93.6 | -6.4% |
| Supernus Pharmaceut… (SUPN) | 100 | 213.6 | +113.6% |
| ACADIA Pharmaceutic… (ACAD) | 100 | 45.1 | -54.9% |
| Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) | 100 | 21.4 | -78.6% |
| PTC Therapeutics, I… (PTCT) | 100 | 145.3 | +45.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FENC vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRGO vs PTCT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FENC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for growth.
- 123.7% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8%
SUPN is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- beta 0.80
- Lower volatility, beta 0.80, Low D/E 3.9%, current ratio 1.90x
- Beta 0.80 vs FENC's 1.78
ACAD has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in defensive.
- Beta 1.11, current ratio 3.83x
- 34.3% margin vs PRGO's -43.5%
- 26.2% ROA vs PRGO's -19.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs 3.7%
PRGO is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if value and dividends is your priority.
- Lower P/E (5.5x vs 9.5x)
- 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend
PTCT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 114.5%, EPS growth 264.5%, 3Y rev CAGR 35.3%
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs SUPN's 223.7%
- +73.3% vs PRGO's -52.0%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 123.7% revenue growth vs PRGO's -2.8% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (5.5x vs 9.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 34.3% margin vs PRGO's -43.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.80 vs FENC's 1.78 | |
| Dividends | 9.8% yield; 10-year raise streak; the other 4 pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +73.3% vs PRGO's -52.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 26.2% ROA vs PRGO's -19.8%, ROIC 10.0% vs 3.7% |
FENC vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRGO vs PTCT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FENC vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRGO vs PTCT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
PRGO leads in 1 of 6 categories
SUPN leads 1 • FENC leads 0 • ACAD leads 0 • PTCT leads 0 • 3 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FENC and ACAD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
PRGO is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.2B annually — 107.7x FENC's $39M. ACAD is the more profitable business, keeping 34.3% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PRGO's -43.5%. On growth, FENC holds the edge at +78.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $39M | $777M | $1.1B | $4.2B | $827M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$5M | $29M | $96M | $58M | -$37M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$7M | -$29M | $376M | -$1.8B | -$187M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$8M | $82M | $212M | $108M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +93.1% | +89.4% | +91.5% | +34.2% | +49.7% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -12.0% | -5.5% | +7.4% | -4.1% | -8.3% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -17.9% | -3.7% | +34.3% | -43.5% | -22.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -20.6% | +10.6% | +19.4% | +2.6% | -20.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +78.7% | +38.6% | +9.7% | -7.2% | -76.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +89.1% | +81.0% | -81.8% | -56.4% | -100.3% |
Valuation Metrics
PRGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 9.5x trailing earnings, PTCT trades at a 3% valuation discount to ACAD's 9.8x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, PTCT's 6.3x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FENC's 55.6x.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $194M | $3.0B | $3.8B | $1.6B | $6.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $187M | $2.9B | $3.7B | $5.1B | $5.6B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -433.13x | -75.78x | 9.78x | -1.14x | 9.47x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 54.27x | 20.81x | 55.62x | 5.53x | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | — | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 55.57x | 52.65x | 26.71x | 7.43x | 6.27x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 4.09x | 4.13x | 3.58x | 0.38x | 3.53x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 2.74x | 3.13x | 0.55x | — |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 7.21x | 64.51x | 36.48x | 11.17x | 8.70x |
Profitability & Efficiency
Evenly matched — ACAD and PTCT each lead in 3 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
ACAD delivers a 35.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $36 in annual profit, vs $-51 for PRGO. SUPN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.04x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PRGO's 1.35x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PTCT scores 7/9 vs PRGO's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | — | -2.7% | +35.6% | -50.7% | — |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -15.0% | -2.0% | +26.2% | -19.8% | -6.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | -2.8% | +10.0% | +3.7% | — |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +9.0% | -3.4% | +10.1% | +4.3% | +55.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.04x | 0.04x | 1.35x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$7M | -$87M | -$126M | $3.4B | -$492M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $27M | $128M | $178M | $532M | $985M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $19M | $41M | $52M | $4.0B | $492M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -1.57x | — | — | -7.20x | -1.67x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — SUPN and PTCT each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in PTCT five years ago would be worth $18,943 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,969 for PRGO. Over the past 12 months, PTCT leads with a +73.3% total return vs PRGO's -52.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors SUPN at 11.9% vs PRGO's -25.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -9.8% | +4.2% | -14.3% | -13.6% | -4.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +11.6% | +63.4% | +32.3% | -52.0% | +73.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.8% | +40.1% | +3.9% | -58.1% | +32.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +15.9% | +75.6% | +6.6% | -60.3% | +89.4% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -42.3% | +223.7% | -23.4% | -77.7% | +852.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.5% | +11.9% | +1.3% | -25.2% | +9.9% |
Risk & Volatility
SUPN leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
SUPN is the less volatile stock with a 0.80 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FENC's 1.78 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. SUPN currently trades 86.3% from its 52-week high vs PRGO's 41.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.78x | 0.80x | 1.11x | 1.21x | 1.03x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $9.92 | $59.68 | $27.81 | $28.44 | $87.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $5.65 | $30.44 | $14.68 | $9.23 | $39.53 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +69.9% | +86.3% | +80.5% | +41.2% | +84.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 53.4 | 61.1 | 53.8 | 53.1 | 40.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 177K | 594K | 1.7M | 3.3M | 1.1M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FENC as "Buy", SUPN as "Buy", ACAD as "Buy", PRGO as "Hold", PTCT as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 209.1% upside for PRGO (target: $36) vs 16.4% for SUPN (target: $60). PRGO is the only dividend payer here at 9.82% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy | Buy | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $18.00 | $60.00 | $34.78 | $36.20 | $98.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 7 | 14 | 37 | 36 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — | — | +9.8% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | — | — | 10 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — | — | $1.15 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% | 0.0% |
PRGO leads in 1 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics). SUPN leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 3 tied.
FENC vs SUPN vs ACAD vs PRGO vs PTCT: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FENC or SUPN or ACAD or PRGO or PTCT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(FENC) is the stronger pick with 123. 7% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). PTC Therapeutics, Inc. (PTCT) offers the better valuation at 9. 5x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. (FENC) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FENC or SUPN or ACAD or PRGO or PTCT?
On trailing P/E, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the cheapest at 9. 5x versus ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. at 9. 8x. On forward P/E, Perrigo Company plc is actually cheaper at 5. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FENC or SUPN or ACAD or PRGO or PTCT?
Over the past 5 years, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) delivered a total return of +89. 4%, compared to -60. 3% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PTCT returned +852. 1% versus PRGO's -77. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FENC or SUPN or ACAD or PRGO or PTCT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
(SUPN) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 80β versus Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. 's 1. 78β — meaning FENC is approximately 122% more volatile than SUPN relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Supernus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (SUPN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 4% versus 135% for Perrigo Company plc — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FENC or SUPN or ACAD or PRGO or PTCT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc.
(FENC) is pulling ahead at 123. 7% versus -2. 8% for Perrigo Company plc (PRGO). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PTC Therapeutics, Inc. grew EPS 264. 5% year-over-year, compared to -723. 2% for Perrigo Company plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, PTCT leads at 35. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FENC or SUPN or ACAD or PRGO or PTCT?
PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the more profitable company, earning 39. 4% net margin versus -33. 5% for Perrigo Company plc — meaning it keeps 39. 4% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: PTCT leads at 49. 5% versus -5. 1% for SUPN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — PTCT leads at 95. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FENC or SUPN or ACAD or PRGO or PTCT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Perrigo Company plc (PRGO) trades at 5.
5x forward P/E versus 55. 6x for ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. — 50. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for PRGO: 209. 1% to $36. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — FENC or SUPN or ACAD or PRGO or PTCT?
In this comparison, PRGO (9.
8% yield) pays a dividend. FENC, SUPN, ACAD, PTCT do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FENC or SUPN or ACAD or PRGO or PTCT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, PTC Therapeutics, Inc.
(PTCT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), +852. 1% 10Y return). Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. (FENC) carries a higher beta of 1. 78 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (PTCT: +852. 1%, FENC: -42. 3%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FENC and SUPN and ACAD and PRGO and PTCT?
Both stocks operate in the Healthcare sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FENC is a small-cap high-growth stock; SUPN is a small-cap quality compounder stock; ACAD is a small-cap deep-value stock; PRGO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; PTCT is a small-cap high-growth stock. PRGO pays a dividend while FENC, SUPN, ACAD, PTCT do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.