FG vs BLK

For growth investors, BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) is the stronger pick with 14. 3% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 7% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG). F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) offers the better valuation at 15. 7x trailing P/E (7. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) a "Buy" — based on 33 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.

(FG) is the cheapest at 15. 7x versus BlackRock, Inc. at 25. 6x. On forward P/E, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 2x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. wins at 0. 35x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 2. 49x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.

(FG) delivered a total return of +92. 7%, compared to +35. 2% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BLK returned +246. 4% versus FG's +92. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.

(FG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 02β versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 1. 28β — meaning BLK is approximately 26% more volatile than FG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, BlackRock, Inc. (BLK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 45% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) is pulling ahead at 14. 3% versus 5. 7% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: BlackRock, Inc. grew EPS 15. 1% year-over-year, compared to -61. 5% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

BlackRock, Inc.

(BLK) is the more profitable company, earning 31. 2% net margin versus 4. 6% for F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. — meaning it keeps 31. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BLK leads at 37. 1% versus 5. 6% for FG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BLK leads at 49. 4%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 35x versus BlackRock, Inc. 's 2. 49x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) trades at 7. 2x forward P/E versus 20. 2x for BlackRock, Inc. — 13. 0x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BLK: 22. 2% to $1311. 78.

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

F&G Annuities & Life, Inc. (FG) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 1. 9% for BlackRock, Inc. (BLK).

For long-horizon retirement investors, F&G Annuities & Life, Inc.

(FG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 02), 3. 5% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FG: +92. 7%, BLK: +246. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FG is a small-cap deep-value stock; BLK is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.