FGI
FGI Industries Ltd.
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
Market Cap$73M
5Y Perf.-68.7%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FGI vs AMZN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
Specialty Retail
Market Cap$2.96T
5Y Perf.+83.8%
FGI vs AMZN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FGI | AMZN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances | Specialty Retail |
| Market Cap | $73M | $2.96T |
| Revenue (TTM) | $136M | $742.78B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-4M | $90.80B |
| Gross Margin | 26.3% | 50.6% |
| Operating Margin | -2.2% | 11.5% |
| Forward P/E | — | 35.3x |
| Total Debt | $28M | $152.99B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $5M | $86.81B |
FGI vs AMZN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FGI
AMZN
| Stock | Jan 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FGI Industries Ltd. (FGI) | 100 | 31.3 | -68.7% |
| Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) | 100 | 183.8 | +83.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGI vs AMZN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FGI leads in 3 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. Amazon.com, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for profitability and margin quality and operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FGI
FGI Industries Ltd.
The Income Pick
FGI carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.08
- Rev growth 12.4%, EPS growth -274.0%, 3Y rev CAGR -10.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.08, current ratio 1.24x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
AMZN
Amazon.com, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
AMZN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 7.2% 10Y total return vs FGI's -61.0%
- 12.2% margin vs FGI's -2.9%
- 11.5% ROA vs FGI's -5.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -3.8%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FGI | 12.4% revenue growth vs AMZN's 12.4% |
| Quality / Margins | AMZN | 12.2% margin vs FGI's -2.9% |
| Stability / Safety | FGI | Beta 1.08 vs AMZN's 1.51 |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | FGI | +198.0% vs AMZN's +48.6% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | AMZN | 11.5% ROA vs FGI's -5.4%, ROIC 14.7% vs -3.8% |
FGI vs AMZN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2024
FY 2025
FGI vs AMZN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLAMZNLAGGINGFGI
FGIFGI Industries Ltd.
1leads
AMZNAmazon.com, Inc.
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FGIMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
AMZN6/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FGI3/4
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
AMZN7/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
AMZN4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
AMZN is the larger business by revenue, generating $742.8B annually — 5475.5x FGI's $136M. AMZN is the more profitable business, keeping 12.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FGI's -2.9%. On growth, AMZN holds the edge at +16.6% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FGIFGI Industries Lt… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $136M | $742.8B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $183,538 | $155.9B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$4M | $90.8B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$3M | -$2.5B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +26.3% | +50.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -2.2% | +11.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.9% | +12.2% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | -0.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -0.7% | +16.6% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -14.0% | +74.8% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FGI leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, AMZN's 20.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FGI's 89.0x.
| Metric | FGIFGI Industries Lt… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $73M | $2.96T |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $96M | $3.02T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -58.46x | 38.35x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 35.26x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.37x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 89.01x | 20.74x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.55x | 4.12x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.37x | 7.24x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 384.26x |
FGI leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
AMZN delivers a 23.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $23 in annual profit, vs $-19 for FGI. AMZN carries lower financial leverage with a 0.37x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FGI's 1.29x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), AMZN scores 6/9 vs FGI's 1/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FGIFGI Industries Lt… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -19.3% | +23.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -5.4% | +11.5% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -3.8% | +14.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -5.9% | +15.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 1 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.29x | 0.37x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $23M | $66.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $5M | $86.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $28M | $153.0B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -2.14x | 39.96x |
AMZN leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in AMZN five years ago would be worth $16,632 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,897 for FGI. Over the past 12 months, FGI leads with a +198.0% total return vs AMZN's +48.6%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors AMZN at 37.5% vs FGI's -4.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FGIFGI Industries Lt… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +33.1% | +21.4% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +198.0% | +48.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.1% | +159.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.0% | +66.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -61.0% | +715.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -4.2% | +37.5% |
AMZN leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FGI and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FGI is the less volatile stock with a 1.08 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than AMZN's 1.51 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. AMZN currently trades 98.7% from its 52-week high vs FGI's 60.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FGIFGI Industries Lt… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.08x | 1.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $12.62 | $278.56 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $2.48 | $183.85 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +60.2% | +98.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 55.5 | 80.5 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 226K | 45.6M |
Evenly matched — FGI and AMZN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | FGIFGI Industries Lt… | AMZNAmazon.com, Inc. |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $306.77 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 94 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
AMZN leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FGI leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics). 1 tied.
Best OverallAmazon.com, Inc. (AMZN)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FGI vs AMZN: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGI or AMZN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) is the stronger pick with 12. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) offers the better valuation at 38. 3x trailing P/E (35. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) a "Buy" — based on 94 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FGI or AMZN?
Over the past 5 years, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) delivered a total return of +66. 3%, compared to -61. 0% for FGI Industries Ltd. (FGI). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: AMZN returned +715. 9% versus FGI's -61. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FGI or AMZN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 08β versus Amazon. com, Inc. 's 1. 51β — meaning AMZN is approximately 39% more volatile than FGI relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 37% versus 129% for FGI Industries Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FGI or AMZN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FGI Industries Ltd.
(FGI) is pulling ahead at 12. 4% versus 12. 4% for Amazon. com, Inc. (AMZN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Amazon. com, Inc. grew EPS 29. 7% year-over-year, compared to -274. 0% for FGI Industries Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, AMZN leads at 11. 7% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FGI or AMZN?
Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the more profitable company, earning 10. 8% net margin versus -0. 9% for FGI Industries Ltd. — meaning it keeps 10. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: AMZN leads at 11. 2% versus -1. 6% for FGI. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — AMZN leads at 50. 3%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FGI or AMZN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FGI or AMZN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Amazon.
com, Inc. (AMZN) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+715. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (AMZN: +715. 9%, FGI: -61. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FGI and AMZN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FGI: -0.7% · AMZN: 16.6%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.