Shell Companies
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FGMC vs BFLY
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Medical - Devices
FGMC vs BFLY — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Medical - Devices |
| Market Cap | $108M | $1.45B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $103M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $-76M |
| Gross Margin | — | 49.2% |
| Operating Margin | — | -79.5% |
| Forward P/E | 74.7x | — |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $20M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $487K | $150M |
FGMC vs BFLY — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Apr 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FG Merger Corp. (FGMC) | 100 | 104.7 | +4.7% |
| Butterfly Network, … (BFLY) | 100 | 166.4 | +66.4% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGMC vs BFLY
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FGMC has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in long-term compounding.
- 5.0% 10Y total return vs BFLY's -44.0%
- 3.7% margin vs BFLY's -73.6%
- 1.9% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC -1.8% vs -76.8%
BFLY is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.
- Rev growth 19.0%, EPS growth 8.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 10.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 3.21, Low D/E 10.4%, current ratio 3.83x
- Beta 3.21, current ratio 3.83x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 19.0% revenue growth vs FGMC's -100.0% | |
| Quality / Margins | 3.7% margin vs BFLY's -73.6% | |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | +127.0% vs FGMC's +6.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.9% ROA vs BFLY's -25.6%, ROIC -1.8% vs -76.8% |
FGMC vs BFLY — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FGMC vs BFLY — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BFLY leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BFLY and FGMC operate at a comparable scale, with $103M and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $103M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$483,959 | -$76M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | -$76M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$19M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +49.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | -79.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | -73.6% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -18.3% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +25.0% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.7% | +16.0% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FGMC and BFLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $108M | $1.4B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $107M | $1.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 74.71x | -17.87x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | — |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 14.85x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 6.99x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.55x | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
FGMC leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FGMC delivers a 1.9% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $2 in annual profit, vs $-37 for BFLY. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FGMC scores 6/9 vs BFLY's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.9% | -36.8% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | -25.6% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.8% | -76.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | -39.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 3 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 0.10x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$486,900 | -$130M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $486,900 | $150M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $20M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | -71.59x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BFLY leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FGMC five years ago would be worth $10,502 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,994 for BFLY. Over the past 12 months, BFLY leads with a +127.0% total return vs FGMC's +6.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BFLY at 35.8% vs FGMC's -0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +47.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.3% | +127.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.3% | +150.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.0% | -60.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.0% | -44.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.4% | +35.8% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FGMC and BFLY each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FGMC is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than BFLY's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BFLY currently trades 92.8% from its 52-week high vs FGMC's 89.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 3.21x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.75 | $5.97 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.73 | $1.32 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.0% | +92.8% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 65.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 4.9M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $5.42 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 7 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
BFLY leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Total Returns). FGMC leads in 1 (Profitability & Efficiency). 2 tied.
FGMC vs BFLY: Frequently Asked Questions
8 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGMC or BFLY a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is the stronger pick with 19. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for FG Merger Corp. (FGMC). FG Merger Corp. (FGMC) offers the better valuation at 74. 7x trailing P/E, making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) a "Buy" — based on 7 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FGMC or BFLY?
Over the past 5 years, FG Merger Corp.
(FGMC) delivered a total return of +5. 0%, compared to -60. 1% for Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FGMC returned +5. 0% versus BFLY's -44. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FGMC or BFLY?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FG Merger Corp.
(FGMC) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Butterfly Network, Inc. 's 3. 21β — meaning BFLY is approximately -19548% more volatile than FGMC relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FGMC or BFLY?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Butterfly Network, Inc.
(BFLY) is pulling ahead at 19. 0% versus -100. 0% for FG Merger Corp. (FGMC). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FGMC or BFLY?
FG Merger Corp.
(FGMC) is the more profitable company, earning 0. 0% net margin versus -79. 0% for Butterfly Network, Inc. — meaning it keeps 0. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FGMC leads at 0. 0% versus -88. 5% for BFLY. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BFLY leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Which pays a better dividend — FGMC or BFLY?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
07Is FGMC or BFLY better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FG Merger Corp.
(FGMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Butterfly Network, Inc. (BFLY) carries a higher beta of 3. 21 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FGMC: +5. 0%, BFLY: -44. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
08What are the main differences between FGMC and BFLY?
These companies operate in different sectors (FGMC (Financial Services) and BFLY (Healthcare)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FGMC is a small-cap quality compounder stock; BFLY is a small-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.
Compare BFLY vs SONO
SONO is one of the most direct listed alternatives to BFLY.
Compare FGMC vs ACIC
ACIC overlaps with FGMC in an adjacent operating segment worth comparing.
Expand With SONO + INVA
SONO and INVA are the strongest missing peers across the current compare set.