FGMC
FG Merger Corp.
Shell Companies
Market Cap$108M
5Y Perf.+4.7%
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisFGMC
MS
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FGMC vs MS
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
MS
Morgan Stanley
Financial - Capital Markets
Market Cap$340.97B
5Y Perf.+165.6%
FGMC vs MS — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  FGMC |  MS |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Shell Companies | Financial - Capital Markets |
| Market Cap | $108M | $340.97B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $0.00 | $114.98B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $1M | $16.86B |
| Gross Margin | — | 57.1% |
| Operating Margin | — | 19.1% |
| Forward P/E | 74.7x | 18.0x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $475.56B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $487K | $111.69B |
FGMC vs MS — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FGMC
MS
| Stock | Apr 22 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FG Merger Corp. (FGMC) | 100 | 104.7 | +4.7% |
| Morgan Stanley (MS) | 100 | 265.6 | +165.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGMC vs MS
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: MS leads in 5 of 6 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. FG Merger Corp. is the stronger pick specifically for operational efficiency and capital deployment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
🥇MS emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FGMC
FG Merger Corp.
The Banking Pick
FGMC is the clearest fit if your priority is sleep-well-at-night and defensive.
- Lower volatility, beta -0.02, current ratio 3.00x
- Beta -0.02, current ratio 3.00x
- NIM 3.7% vs MS's 0.7%
Best for: sleep-well-at-night and defensive
MS
Morgan Stanley
The Banking Pick
MS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 12 yrs, beta 1.40, yield 1.9%
- Rev growth 11.5%, EPS growth 28.3%
- 8.5% 10Y total return vs FGMC's 5.0%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  MS | 11.5% NII/revenue growth vs FGMC's -100.0% |
| Value | MS | Lower P/E (18.0x vs 74.7x) |
| Quality / Margins | MS | 14.7% margin vs FGMC's 3.7% |
| Dividends | MS | 1.9% yield; 12-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | MS | +65.3% vs FGMC's +6.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) |  FGMC | 1.9% ROA vs MS's 1.2%, ROIC -1.8% vs 3.1% |
FGMC vs MS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FGMC vs MS — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLMSLAGGINGFGMC
FGMCFG Merger Corp.
0leads
MSMorgan Stanley
5leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs FGMCMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
MS1/1
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
MS2/3
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
MS4/7
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
MS6/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
MS1/1
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
MS and FGMC operate at a comparable scale, with $115.0B and $0 in trailing revenue.
| Metric | FGMCFG Merger Corp. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $0 | $115.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$483,959 | $26.6B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $1M | $16.9B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $1M | -$17.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | — | +57.1% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | — | +19.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | — | +14.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | — | -15.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -32.7% | +48.9% |
MS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Valuation Metrics
MS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.0x trailing earnings, MS trades at a 72% valuation discount to FGMC's 74.7x P/E.
| Metric | FGMCFG Merger Corp. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $108M | $341.0B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $107M | $704.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 74.71x | 20.98x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 18.00x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 2.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 26.49x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 2.97x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.02x | 3.03x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 72.55x | 7.40x |
MS leads this category, winning 2 of 3 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
MS delivers a 15.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $15 in annual profit, vs $2 for FGMC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), MS scores 7/9 vs FGMC's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | FGMCFG Merger Corp. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +1.9% | +15.3% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.9% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -1.8% | +3.1% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -2.4% | +3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 4.22x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$486,900 | $363.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $486,900 | $111.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $475.6B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | 0.45x |
MS leads this category, winning 4 of 7 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
MS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in MS five years ago would be worth $25,467 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $10,502 for FGMC. Over the past 12 months, MS leads with a +65.3% total return vs FGMC's +6.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors MS at 37.1% vs FGMC's -0.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FGMCFG Merger Corp. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +4.0% | +18.8% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +6.3% | +65.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -1.3% | +157.5% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.0% | +154.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +5.0% | +854.4% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -0.4% | +37.1% |
MS leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FGMC and MS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FGMC is the less volatile stock with a -0.02 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than MS's 1.40 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. MS currently trades 97.7% from its 52-week high vs FGMC's 89.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FGMCFG Merger Corp. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | -0.02x | 1.40x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $11.75 | $219.16 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $9.73 | $128.81 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +89.0% | +97.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 60.5 | 62.2 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 117K | 4.5M |
Evenly matched — FGMC and MS each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
MS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
MS is the only dividend payer here at 1.93% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | FGMCFG Merger Corp. | MSMorgan Stanley |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $201.25 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 52 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 2 | 12 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $4.14 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.7% |
MS leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Key Takeaway
MS leads in 5 of 6 categories — strongest in Income & Cash Flow and Valuation Metrics. 1 category is tied.
Best OverallMorgan Stanley (MS)Leads 5 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FGMC vs MS: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGMC or MS a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the stronger pick with 11.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for FG Merger Corp. (FGMC). Morgan Stanley (MS) offers the better valuation at 21. 0x trailing P/E (18. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Morgan Stanley (MS) a "Buy" — based on 52 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FGMC or MS?
On trailing P/E, Morgan Stanley (MS) is the cheapest at 21.
0x versus FG Merger Corp. at 74. 7x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FGMC or MS?
Over the past 5 years, Morgan Stanley (MS) delivered a total return of +154.
7%, compared to +5. 0% for FG Merger Corp. (FGMC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: MS returned +854. 4% versus FGMC's +5. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FGMC or MS?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FG Merger Corp.
(FGMC) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 02β versus Morgan Stanley's 1. 40β — meaning MS is approximately -8601% more volatile than FGMC relative to the S&P 500.
05Which is growing faster — FGMC or MS?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Morgan Stanley (MS) is pulling ahead at 11.
5% versus -100. 0% for FG Merger Corp. (FGMC). Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FGMC or MS?
Morgan Stanley (MS) is the more profitable company, earning 14.
7% net margin versus 0. 0% for FG Merger Corp. — meaning it keeps 14. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: MS leads at 19. 1% versus 0. 0% for FGMC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — MS leads at 57. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Which pays a better dividend — FGMC or MS?
In this comparison, MS (1.
9% yield) pays a dividend. FGMC does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FGMC or MS better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, FG Merger Corp.
(FGMC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 02)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FGMC: +5. 0%, MS: +854. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FGMC and MS?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
MS pays a dividend while FGMC does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.