FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
Consulting Services
Market Cap—
5Y Perf.—
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisFGO
KFRC
JPM
Try popular comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
KFRC
Kforce Inc.
Staffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$875M
5Y Perf.+63.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Banks - Diversified
Market Cap$869.15B
5Y Perf.+230.8%
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot |  FGO |  KFRC |  JPM |
|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Banks - Diversified |
| Market Cap | — | $875M | $869.15B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $1.33B | $280.33B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $35M | $57.05B |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 27.2% | 60.0% |
| Operating Margin | 37.6% | 3.8% | 25.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.9x | 14.0x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $70M | $942.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $2M | $343.34B |
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FGO
KFRC
JPM
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 163.7 | +63.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 330.8 | +230.8% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGO vs KFRC vs JPM
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FGO and KFRC are tied at the top with 3 categories each — the right choice depends on your priorities. Kforce Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
The Growth Play
FGO has the current edge in this matchup, primarily because of its strength in growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.0%, EPS growth 15.8%
- 40.0% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 33.2% margin vs KFRC's 2.6%
Best for: growth exposure
KFRC
Kforce Inc.
The Income Pick
KFRC is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.30, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.78x
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 433.9% 10Y total return vs KFRC's 197.0%
- Lower P/E (14.0x vs 19.9x)
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth |  FGO | 40.0% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% |
| Value |  JPM | Lower P/E (14.0x vs 19.9x) |
| Quality / Margins | FGO | 33.2% margin vs KFRC's 2.6% |
| Stability / Safety |  KFRC | Beta 0.30 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage |
| Dividends | KFRC | 3.2% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) |
| Momentum (1Y) | KFRC | +19.1% vs JPM's +18.8% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FGO | 34.4% ROA vs JPM's 1.3%, ROIC 95.7% vs 4.5% |
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FY 2025
FY 2025
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 3 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFGOLAGGINGJPM
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
1leads
KFRCKforce Inc.
1leads
FGOFG Holdings Limited C…
2leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs KFRCvs JPMMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FGO3/5
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
Tied
—
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FGO8/8
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
JPM4/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
KFRC2/2
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
Tied
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 13187.8x FGO's $21M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KFRC's 2.6%.
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | KFRCKforce Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $1.3B | $280.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $56M | $81.4B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $35M | $57.0B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $43M | $100.9B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +27.2% | +60.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +3.8% | +25.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +2.6% | +20.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +3.3% | +36.0% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +0.1% | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.2% | +16.0% |
FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FGO and KFRC and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 15.5x trailing earnings, JPM trades at a 36% valuation discount to KFRC's 24.4x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, KFRC's 17.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than JPM's 18.0x.
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | KFRCKforce Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $875M | $869.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $943M | $1.47T |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 24.43x | 15.52x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.90x | 13.97x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.19x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.95x | 18.03x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.66x | 3.11x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 6.83x | 2.40x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.70x | 8.62x |
Evenly matched — FGO and KFRC and JPM each lead in 2 of 6 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $16 for JPM. FGO carries lower financial leverage with a 0.54x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FGO scores 6/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | KFRCKforce Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +65.5% | +27.2% | +15.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +34.4% | +9.2% | +1.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +95.7% | +19.1% | +4.5% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +73.8% | +20.1% | +8.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.56x | 2.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | $68M | $599.0B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $2M | $343.3B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $70M | $942.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.74x |
FGO leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,593 for KFRC. Over the past 12 months, KFRC leads with a +19.1% total return vs JPM's +18.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.4% vs KFRC's -5.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | KFRCKforce Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +54.1% | -3.5% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | +19.1% | +18.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -15.8% | +131.9% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -14.1% | +102.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +197.0% | +433.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -5.6% | +32.4% |
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs JPM's 92.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | KFRCKforce Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.30x | 0.95x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.00 | $48.81 | $337.25 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $24.49 | $262.71 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +98.1% | +92.2% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | — | 68.0 | 59.6 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 242K | 7.1M |
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFRC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 8.9% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs JPM's 1.91%.
| Metric | FGOFG Holdings Limit… | KFRCKforce Inc. | JPMJPMorgan Chase & … |
|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $71.00 | $338.78 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 61 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +1.9% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.55 | $5.95 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +5.8% | +4.0% |
Evenly matched — KFRC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway
FGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
Best OverallFG Holdings Limited Class A… (FGO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGO or KFRC or JPM a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the stronger pick with 40.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) offers the better valuation at 15. 5x trailing P/E (14. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FGO or KFRC or JPM?
On trailing P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) is the cheapest at 15. 5x versus Kforce Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, JPMorgan Chase & Co. is actually cheaper at 14. 0x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FGO or KFRC or JPM?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 6%, compared to -14. 1% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +433. 9% versus KFRC's +197. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FGO or KFRC or JPM?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 95β — meaning JPM is approximately 213% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 54% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FGO or KFRC or JPM?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is pulling ahead at 40.
0% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares grew EPS 15. 8% year-over-year, compared to -25. 2% for Kforce Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FGO or KFRC or JPM?
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
2% net margin versus 2. 6% for Kforce Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FGO leads at 37. 6% versus 3. 8% for KFRC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FGO leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FGO or KFRC or JPM more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) trades at 14. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Kforce Inc. — 5. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 48. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FGO or KFRC or JPM?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
2% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FGO or KFRC or JPM better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 3. 2% yield, +197. 0% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FGO and KFRC and JPM?
These companies operate in different sectors (FGO (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock. KFRC, JPM pay a dividend while FGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.