Consulting Services
Build Your Comparison
Side-by-side financial analysisStock Comparison
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Staffing & Employment Services
Banks - Diversified
Banks - Diversified
Staffing & Employment Services
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Consulting Services | Staffing & Employment Services | Banks - Diversified | Banks - Diversified | Staffing & Employment Services |
| Market Cap | — | $875M | $869.15B | $404.74B | $412M |
| Revenue (TTM) | $21M | $1.33B | $280.33B | $191.57B | $4.13B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $7M | $35M | $57.05B | $30.51B | $-266M |
| Gross Margin | 78.5% | 27.2% | 60.0% | 56.1% | 19.5% |
| Operating Margin | 37.6% | 3.8% | 25.9% | 19.7% | -1.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 19.9x | 14.0x | 12.0x | 13.2x |
| Total Debt | $8M | $70M | $942.38B | $365.90B | $159M |
| Cash & Equiv. | $16M | $2M | $343.34B | $231.84B | $33M |
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jun 20 | Jun 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kforce Inc. (KFRC) | 100 | 163.7 | +63.7% |
| JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) | 100 | 330.8 | +230.8% |
| Bank of America Cor… (BAC) | 100 | 225.8 | +125.8% |
| Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) | 100 | 75.1 | -24.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.
- Rev growth 40.0%, EPS growth 15.8%
- 40.0% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
- 33.2% margin vs KELYA's -6.4%
- 34.4% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 95.7% vs -4.0%
KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.
- Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 3.2%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.30, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.78x
- Beta 0.30 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage
JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.
- 433.9% 10Y total return vs BAC's 324.7%
- NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
BAC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.78 vs JPM's 1.07
- Lower P/E (12.0x vs 14.0x), PEG 0.78 vs 1.07
- +22.0% vs KELYA's +1.0%
Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 40.0% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (12.0x vs 14.0x), PEG 0.78 vs 1.07 | |
| Quality / Margins | 33.2% margin vs KELYA's -6.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.30 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 3.2% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.0% vs KELYA's +1.0% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 34.4% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 95.7% vs -4.0% |
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FGO leads in 2 of 6 categories
JPM leads 1 • KFRC leads 1 • BAC leads 0 • KELYA leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 13187.8x FGO's $21M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.4%. On growth, KFRC holds the edge at +0.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $21M | $1.3B | $280.3B | $191.6B | $4.1B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | — | $56M | $81.4B | $40.0B | -$35M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | — | $35M | $57.0B | $30.5B | -$266M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | — | $43M | $100.9B | $12.6B | $66M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +78.5% | +27.2% | +60.0% | +56.1% | +19.5% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +3.8% | +25.9% | +19.7% | -1.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +33.2% | +2.6% | +20.4% | +15.9% | -6.4% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +24.8% | +3.3% | +36.0% | +6.6% | +1.6% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +0.1% | — | — | -10.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +2.2% | +16.0% | +18.3% | -2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — BAC and KELYA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 14.0x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 43% valuation discount to KFRC's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BAC offers better value at 0.91x vs JPM's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | — | $875M | $869.1B | $404.7B | $412M |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | — | $943M | $1.47T | $538.8B | $538M |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 0.00x | 24.43x | 15.52x | 14.04x | -1.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 19.90x | 13.97x | 12.02x | 13.16x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — | 1.19x | 0.91x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 16.95x | 18.03x | 13.47x | — |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | — | 0.66x | 3.11x | 2.11x | 0.10x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.00x | 6.83x | 2.40x | 1.33x | 0.43x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 18.70x | 8.62x | 32.09x | 3.61x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +65.5% | +27.2% | +15.9% | +10.1% | -24.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +34.4% | +9.2% | +1.3% | +0.9% | -11.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +95.7% | +19.1% | +4.5% | +3.5% | -4.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +73.8% | +20.1% | +8.9% | +4.5% | -4.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.54x | 0.56x | 2.60x | 1.21x | 0.16x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$9M | $68M | $599.0B | $134.1B | $126M |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $16M | $2M | $343.3B | $231.8B | $33M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $8M | $70M | $942.4B | $365.9B | $159M |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | — | — | 0.74x | 0.48x | -8.78x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,218 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +22.0% total return vs KELYA's +1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.4% vs KELYA's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | — | +54.1% | -3.5% | -3.1% | +39.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | — | +19.1% | +18.8% | +22.0% | +1.0% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -15.8% | +131.9% | +94.2% | -31.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | -14.1% | +102.6% | +36.4% | -47.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | — | +197.0% | +433.9% | +324.7% | -27.3% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | — | -5.6% | +32.4% | +24.8% | -11.8% |
Risk & Volatility
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 0.30x | 0.95x | 0.89x | 0.93x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $0.00 | $48.81 | $337.25 | $57.55 | $14.94 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $0.00 | $24.49 | $262.71 | $43.66 | $7.98 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | — | +98.1% | +92.2% | +93.2% | +79.5% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | — | 68.0 | 59.6 | 62.7 | 69.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 0 | 242K | 7.1M | 32.3M | 428K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — KFRC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 8.9% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs JPM's 1.91%.
| Metric | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Hold | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $71.00 | $338.78 | $61.13 | $15.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 10 | 61 | 54 | 5 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +3.2% | +1.9% | +2.4% | +2.6% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 8 | 15 | 12 | 0 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.55 | $5.95 | $1.27 | $0.31 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | — | +5.8% | +4.0% | +5.3% | +3.0% |
FGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.
FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the stronger pick with 40.
0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?
On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.
0x versus Kforce Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank of America Corporation wins at 0. 78x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?
Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.
(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 6%, compared to -47. 8% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +433. 9% versus KELYA's -27. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 95β — meaning JPM is approximately 213% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is pulling ahead at 40.
0% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bank of America Corporation grew EPS 18. 6% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KELYA leads at -5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.
2% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FGO leads at 37. 6% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FGO leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Kforce Inc. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 48. 3% to $71. 00.
08Which pays a better dividend — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?
In this comparison, KFRC (3.
2% yield), KELYA (2. 6% yield), BAC (2. 4% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.
(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 3. 2% yield, +197. 0% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FGO and KFRC and JPM and BAC and KELYA?
These companies operate in different sectors (FGO (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and KELYA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; KELYA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KFRC, JPM, BAC, KELYA pay a dividend while FGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.