Build Your Comparison

Side-by-side financial analysis
FGO logo
FGO
KFRC logo
KFRC
JPM logo
JPM
BAC logo
BAC
KELYA logo
KELYA
Try popular comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Consulting Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • HK
Market Cap
5Y Perf.
KFRC
Kforce Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$875M
5Y Perf.+63.7%
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$869.15B
5Y Perf.+230.8%
BAC
Bank of America Corporation

Banks - Diversified

Financial ServicesNYSE • US
Market Cap$404.74B
5Y Perf.+125.8%
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.

Staffing & Employment Services

IndustrialsNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$412M
5Y Perf.-24.9%

FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FGO logoFGO
KFRC logoKFRC
JPM logoJPM
BAC logoBAC
KELYA logoKELYA
IndustryConsulting ServicesStaffing & Employment ServicesBanks - DiversifiedBanks - DiversifiedStaffing & Employment Services
Market Cap$875M$869.15B$404.74B$412M
Revenue (TTM)$21M$1.33B$280.33B$191.57B$4.13B
Net Income (TTM)$7M$35M$57.05B$30.51B$-266M
Gross Margin78.5%27.2%60.0%56.1%19.5%
Operating Margin37.6%3.8%25.9%19.7%-1.9%
Forward P/E19.9x14.0x12.0x13.2x
Total Debt$8M$70M$942.38B$365.90B$159M
Cash & Equiv.$16M$2M$343.34B$231.84B$33M

FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYALong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FGO
KFRC
JPM
BAC
KELYA
StockJun 20Jun 26Return
Kforce Inc. (KFRC)100163.7+63.7%
JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM)100330.8+230.8%
Bank of America Cor… (BAC)100225.8+125.8%
Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA)10075.1-24.9%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: FGO leads in 3 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and profitability and margin quality. Kforce Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for capital preservation and lower volatility and dividend income and shareholder returns. BAC also leads in specific categories worth noting. This set spans 2 sectors — these stocks serve different portfolio roles, not just different price points.
🥇FGO emerged as the overall leader. Track its performance:
FGO
FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares
The Growth Play

FGO carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure.

  • Rev growth 40.0%, EPS growth 15.8%
  • 40.0% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
  • 33.2% margin vs KELYA's -6.4%
  • 34.4% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 95.7% vs -4.0%
Best for: growth exposure
KFRC
Kforce Inc.
The Income Pick

KFRC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and sleep-well-at-night is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 8 yrs, beta 0.30, yield 3.2%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.30, Low D/E 56.0%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.30, yield 3.2%, current ratio 1.78x
  • Beta 0.30 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage
Best for: income & stability and sleep-well-at-night
JPM
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
The Banking Pick

JPM is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and bank quality.

  • 433.9% 10Y total return vs BAC's 324.7%
  • NIM 2.2% vs BAC's 1.8%
Best for: long-term compounding and bank quality
BAC
Bank of America Corporation
The Banking Pick

BAC ranks third and is worth considering specifically for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.78 vs JPM's 1.07
  • Lower P/E (12.0x vs 14.0x), PEG 0.78 vs 1.07
  • +22.0% vs KELYA's +1.0%
Best for: valuation efficiency
KELYA
Kelly Services, Inc.
The Income Angle

Among these 5 stocks, KELYA doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: industrials exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFGO logoFGO40.0% revenue growth vs KFRC's -5.4%
ValueBAC logoBACLower P/E (12.0x vs 14.0x), PEG 0.78 vs 1.07
Quality / MarginsFGO logoFGO33.2% margin vs KELYA's -6.4%
Stability / SafetyKFRC logoKFRCBeta 0.30 vs JPM's 0.95, lower leverage
DividendsKFRC logoKFRC3.2% yield, 8-year raise streak, vs JPM's 1.9%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)BAC logoBAC+22.0% vs KELYA's +1.0%
Efficiency (ROA)FGO logoFGO34.4% ROA vs KELYA's -11.3%, ROIC 95.7% vs -4.0%

FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FGOFG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares

Segment breakdown not available.

KFRCKforce Inc.
FY 2025
Flex Revenue
98.1%$1.3B
Direct Hire Revenue
1.9%$26M
JPMJPMorgan Chase & Co.
FY 2025
Commercial And Investment Bank
43.0%$78.5B
Consumer & Community Banking
41.7%$76.0B
Asset and Wealth Management Segment
13.2%$24.1B
Segment Reporting, Reconciling Item, Corporate Nonsegment
3.9%$7.0B
Segment Reconciling Items
-1.7%$-3,134,000,000
BACBank of America Corporation
FY 2024
Loans and Leases
32.2%$62.0B
other interest income
14.7%$28.3B
Debt securities
13.5%$26.0B
Federal funds sold and securities borrowed or purchased under agreements to resell
10.3%$19.9B
Investment And Brokerage Services
9.2%$17.8B
Market making and similar activities
6.7%$13.0B
Trading account assets
5.4%$10.4B
Other (4)
7.8%$15.1B
KELYAKelly Services, Inc.
FY 2025
Science, Engineering & Technology
55.1%$1.2B
Education
44.9%$1.0B

FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLFGOLAGGINGKELYA

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

JPM is the larger business by revenue, generating $280.3B annually — 13187.8x FGO's $21M. FGO is the more profitable business, keeping 33.2% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to KELYA's -6.4%. On growth, KFRC holds the edge at +0.1% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$21M$1.3B$280.3B$191.6B$4.1B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$56M$81.4B$40.0B-$35M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$35M$57.0B$30.5B-$266M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$43M$100.9B$12.6B$66M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+78.5%+27.2%+60.0%+56.1%+19.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+37.6%+3.8%+25.9%+19.7%-1.9%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+33.2%+2.6%+20.4%+15.9%-6.4%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+24.8%+3.3%+36.0%+6.6%+1.6%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+0.1%-10.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+2.2%+16.0%+18.3%-2.1%
FGO leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

Evenly matched — BAC and KELYA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 14.0x trailing earnings, BAC trades at a 43% valuation discount to KFRC's 24.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BAC offers better value at 0.91x vs JPM's 1.19x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
Market CapShares × price$875M$869.1B$404.7B$412M
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$943M$1.47T$538.8B$538M
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS0.00x24.43x15.52x14.04x-1.64x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.19.90x13.97x12.02x13.16x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate1.19x0.91x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple16.95x18.03x13.47x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.66x3.11x2.11x0.10x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share0.00x6.83x2.40x1.33x0.43x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF18.70x8.62x32.09x3.61x
Evenly matched — BAC and KELYA each lead in 3 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

FGO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

FGO delivers a 65.5% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $66 in annual profit, vs $-25 for KELYA. KELYA carries lower financial leverage with a 0.16x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to JPM's 2.60x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BAC scores 7/9 vs KFRC's 4/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+65.5%+27.2%+15.9%+10.1%-24.6%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+34.4%+9.2%+1.3%+0.9%-11.3%
ROICReturn on invested capital+95.7%+19.1%+4.5%+3.5%-4.0%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+73.8%+20.1%+8.9%+4.5%-4.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–964575
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.54x0.56x2.60x1.21x0.16x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash-$9M$68M$599.0B$134.1B$126M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$16M$2M$343.3B$231.8B$33M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$8M$70M$942.4B$365.9B$159M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense0.74x0.48x-8.78x
FGO leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in JPM five years ago would be worth $20,255 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,218 for KELYA. Over the past 12 months, BAC leads with a +22.0% total return vs KELYA's +1.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors JPM at 32.4% vs KELYA's -11.8% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+54.1%-3.5%-3.1%+39.2%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+19.1%+18.8%+22.0%+1.0%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-15.8%+131.9%+94.2%-31.4%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-14.1%+102.6%+36.4%-47.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+197.0%+433.9%+324.7%-27.3%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-5.6%+32.4%+24.8%-11.8%
JPM leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

KFRC is the less volatile stock with a 0.30 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than JPM's 0.95 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. KFRC currently trades 98.1% from its 52-week high vs KELYA's 79.5% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.30x0.95x0.89x0.93x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$0.00$48.81$337.25$57.55$14.94
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$0.00$24.49$262.71$43.66$7.98
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+98.1%+92.2%+93.2%+79.5%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10068.059.662.769.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded0242K7.1M32.3M428K
KFRC leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — KFRC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: KFRC as "Hold", JPM as "Buy", BAC as "Buy", KELYA as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 48.3% upside for KFRC (target: $71) vs 8.9% for JPM (target: $339). For income investors, KFRC offers the higher dividend yield at 3.23% vs JPM's 1.91%.

MetricFGO logoFGOFG Holdings Limit…KFRC logoKFRCKforce Inc.JPM logoJPMJPMorgan Chase & …BAC logoBACBank of America C…KELYA logoKELYAKelly Services, I…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuyBuyBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$71.00$338.78$61.13$15.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts1061545
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+3.2%+1.9%+2.4%+2.6%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises815120
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$1.55$5.95$1.27$0.31
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+5.8%+4.0%+5.3%+3.0%
Evenly matched — KFRC and JPM each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

FGO leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). JPM leads in 1 (Total Returns). 2 tied.

Best OverallFG Holdings Limited Class A… (FGO)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FGO vs KFRC vs JPM vs BAC vs KELYA: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the stronger pick with 40.

0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). Bank of America Corporation (BAC) offers the better valuation at 14. 0x trailing P/E (12. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate JPMorgan Chase & Co. (JPM) a "Buy" — based on 61 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?

On trailing P/E, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the cheapest at 14.

0x versus Kforce Inc. at 24. 4x. On forward P/E, Bank of America Corporation is actually cheaper at 12. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Bank of America Corporation wins at 0. 78x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 07x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?

Over the past 5 years, JPMorgan Chase & Co.

(JPM) delivered a total return of +102. 6%, compared to -47. 8% for Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: JPM returned +433. 9% versus KELYA's -27. 3%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 30β versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 0. 95β — meaning JPM is approximately 213% more volatile than KFRC relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Kelly Services, Inc. (KELYA) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 16% versus 3% for JPMorgan Chase & Co. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is pulling ahead at 40.

0% versus -5. 4% for Kforce Inc. (KFRC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Bank of America Corporation grew EPS 18. 6% year-over-year, compared to -427. 4% for Kelly Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, KELYA leads at -5. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?

FG Holdings Limited Class A Ordinary Shares (FGO) is the more profitable company, earning 33.

2% net margin versus -6. 0% for Kelly Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 33. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FGO leads at 37. 6% versus -1. 6% for KELYA. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FGO leads at 78. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 78x versus JPMorgan Chase & Co. 's 1. 07x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Bank of America Corporation (BAC) trades at 12. 0x forward P/E versus 19. 9x for Kforce Inc. — 7. 9x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for KFRC: 48. 3% to $71. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA?

In this comparison, KFRC (3.

2% yield), KELYA (2. 6% yield), BAC (2. 4% yield), JPM (1. 9% yield) pay a dividend. FGO does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FGO or KFRC or JPM or BAC or KELYA better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, Kforce Inc.

(KFRC) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 30), 3. 2% yield, +197. 0% 10Y return). Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FGO and KFRC and JPM and BAC and KELYA?

These companies operate in different sectors (FGO (Industrials) and KFRC (Industrials) and JPM (Financial Services) and BAC (Financial Services) and KELYA (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.

In terms of investment character: FGO is a small-cap high-growth stock; KFRC is a small-cap income-oriented stock; JPM is a large-cap deep-value stock; BAC is a large-cap deep-value stock; KELYA is a small-cap quality compounder stock. KFRC, JPM, BAC, KELYA pay a dividend while FGO does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.