FHB vs HBCP

For growth investors, Home Bancorp, Inc.

(HBCP) is the stronger pick with 4. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 3. 2% for First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB). Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) offers the better valuation at 11. 0x trailing P/E (10. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) a "Buy" — based on 3 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

On trailing P/E, Home Bancorp, Inc.

(HBCP) is the cheapest at 11. 0x versus First Hawaiian, Inc. at 12. 6x. On forward P/E, Home Bancorp, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 9x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Home Bancorp, Inc. wins at 0. 70x versus First Hawaiian, Inc. 's 1. 35x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

Over the past 5 years, Home Bancorp, Inc.

(HBCP) delivered a total return of +79. 7%, compared to +15. 0% for First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: HBCP returned +159. 8% versus FHB's +53. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Home Bancorp, Inc.

(HBCP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 83β versus First Hawaiian, Inc. 's 1. 03β — meaning FHB is approximately 24% more volatile than HBCP relative to the S&P 500.

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Home Bancorp, Inc.

(HBCP) is pulling ahead at 4. 9% versus 3. 2% for First Hawaiian, Inc. (FHB). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Home Bancorp, Inc. grew EPS 28. 4% year-over-year, compared to 22. 9% for First Hawaiian, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

First Hawaiian, Inc.

(FHB) is the more profitable company, earning 23. 6% net margin versus 22. 0% for Home Bancorp, Inc. — meaning it keeps 23. 6% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FHB leads at 30. 3% versus 27. 7% for HBCP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FHB leads at 73. 1%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 70x versus First Hawaiian, Inc. 's 1. 35x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Home Bancorp, Inc. (HBCP) trades at 10. 9x forward P/E versus 12. 2x for First Hawaiian, Inc. — 1. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FHB: 0. 8% to $27. 83.

In this comparison, FHB (3.

8% yield) pays a dividend. HBCP does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

For long-horizon retirement investors, First Hawaiian, Inc.

(FHB) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 03), 3. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FHB: +53. 4%, HBCP: +159. 8%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

FHB pays a dividend while HBCP does not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.