Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FIBK vs COLB vs GBCI vs WAFD
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
Banks - Regional
FIBK vs COLB vs GBCI vs WAFD — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional | Banks - Regional |
| Market Cap | $3.37B | $6.92B | $6.07B | $2.69B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $1.06B | $3.21B | $1.43B | $1.41B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $302M | $550M | $239M | $243M |
| Gross Margin | 97.5% | 67.7% | 69.0% | 50.9% |
| Operating Margin | 37.0% | 23.4% | 22.9% | 20.5% |
| Forward P/E | 12.9x | 9.5x | 15.1x | 10.8x |
| Total Debt | $776M | $4.01B | $2.90B | $1.82B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $358M | $511M | $322M | $657M |
FIBK vs COLB vs GBCI vs WAFD — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Columbia Banking Sy… (COLB) | 100 | 119.4 | +19.4% |
| Glacier Bancorp, In… (GBCI) | 100 | 113.2 | +13.2% |
| WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) | 100 | 136.0 | +36.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIBK vs COLB vs GBCI vs WAFD
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIBK is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if bank quality is your priority.
- NIM 3.1% vs WAFD's 2.5%
- 5.5% yield, vs WAFD's 3.0%
COLB is the clearest fit if your priority is value.
- Lower P/E (9.5x vs 15.1x)
GBCI is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and defensive.
- Rev growth 14.5%, EPS growth 18.5%
- Beta 1.16, yield 2.7%, current ratio 307.57x
- 14.5% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5%
WAFD carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 7 yrs, beta 0.79, yield 3.0%
- 80.5% 10Y total return vs GBCI's 134.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.79, Low D/E 59.8%, current ratio 0.00x
- PEG 3.50 vs FIBK's 4.23
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 14.5% NII/revenue growth vs FIBK's -28.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (9.5x vs 15.1x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FIBK's 0.6% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.79 vs COLB's 1.36 | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, vs WAFD's 3.0% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.2% vs FIBK's +2.3% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.3% vs FIBK's 0.6% |
FIBK vs COLB vs GBCI vs WAFD — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
Segment breakdown not available.
FIBK vs COLB vs GBCI vs WAFD — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
FIBK leads in 3 of 6 categories
WAFD leads 1 • COLB leads 0 • GBCI leads 0 • 2 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIBK leads this category, winning 5 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
COLB is the larger business by revenue, generating $3.2B annually — 3.0x FIBK's $1.1B. FIBK is the more profitable business, keeping 28.5% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to WAFD's 16.0%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $1.1B | $3.2B | $1.4B | $1.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $428M | $895M | $365M | $277M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $302M | $550M | $239M | $243M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $278M | $724M | $337M | $226M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +97.5% | +67.7% | +69.0% | +50.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +37.0% | +23.4% | +22.9% | +20.5% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +28.5% | +17.1% | +16.8% | +16.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.2% | +22.0% | +24.4% | +14.8% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +116.0% | +5.9% | -9.3% | +46.3% |
Valuation Metrics
FIBK leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 11.8x trailing earnings, FIBK trades at a 50% valuation discount to GBCI's 23.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), FIBK offers better value at 3.86x vs WAFD's 4.34x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $3.4B | $6.9B | $6.1B | $2.7B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $3.8B | $10.4B | $8.6B | $3.8B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 11.77x | 12.65x | 23.43x | 13.37x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 12.91x | 9.51x | 15.10x | 10.77x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 3.86x | — | — | 4.34x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 9.68x | 11.64x | 23.68x | 12.86x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 3.19x | 2.15x | 4.25x | 1.91x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.03x | 1.10x | 1.44x | 0.93x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 12.14x | 9.81x | 17.45x | 12.91x |
Profitability & Efficiency
FIBK leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FIBK delivers a 8.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $9 in annual profit, vs $7 for GBCI. FIBK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.23x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GBCI's 0.69x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FIBK scores 7/9 vs COLB's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +8.8% | +8.4% | +6.5% | +8.0% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +0.9% | +0.8% | +1.0% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +5.9% | +5.4% | +3.5% | +3.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.3% | +2.0% | +1.7% | +5.7% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 7 | 6 | 7 | 7 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.23x | 0.51x | 0.69x | 0.60x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $418M | $3.5B | $2.6B | $1.2B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $358M | $511M | $322M | $657M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $776M | $4.0B | $2.9B | $1.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 1.11x | 0.82x | 0.80x | 0.48x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — GBCI and WAFD each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in WAFD five years ago would be worth $12,420 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,613 for COLB. Over the past 12 months, WAFD leads with a +21.2% total return vs FIBK's +2.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GBCI at 22.5% vs FIBK's 3.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -1.6% | +4.5% | +5.2% | +10.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +2.3% | +19.2% | +8.6% | +21.2% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +11.4% | +81.3% | +84.0% | +51.4% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +21.0% | -13.9% | -8.1% | +24.2% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +39.2% | +47.4% | +134.1% | +80.5% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +3.7% | +21.9% | +22.5% | +14.8% |
Risk & Volatility
WAFD leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
WAFD is the less volatile stock with a 0.79 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than COLB's 1.36 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. WAFD currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs GBCI's 86.3% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | — | 1.36x | 1.16x | 0.79x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $39.26 | $32.70 | $53.99 | $36.53 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $31.62 | $21.91 | $39.90 | $26.31 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +88.1% | +89.0% | +86.3% | +96.3% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.8 | 51.9 | 45.1 | 65.0 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 1.2M | 2.6M | 852K | 655K |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIBK and WAFD each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: FIBK as "Hold", COLB as "Buy", GBCI as "Buy", WAFD as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 23.0% upside for GBCI (target: $57) vs -0.5% for WAFD (target: $35). For income investors, FIBK offers the higher dividend yield at 5.46% vs GBCI's 2.68%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $38.33 | $32.90 | $57.33 | $35.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 15 | 19 | 14 | 11 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +5.5% | +3.9% | +2.7% | +3.0% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.89 | $1.13 | $1.25 | $1.05 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +3.6% | +1.6% | 0.0% | +3.8% |
FIBK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). WAFD leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 2 tied.
FIBK vs COLB vs GBCI vs WAFD: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIBK or COLB or GBCI or WAFD a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Glacier Bancorp, Inc.
(GBCI) is the stronger pick with 14. 5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) offers the better valuation at 11. 8x trailing P/E (12. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) a "Buy" — based on 19 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIBK or COLB or GBCI or WAFD?
On trailing P/E, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(FIBK) is the cheapest at 11. 8x versus Glacier Bancorp, Inc. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Columbia Banking System, Inc. is actually cheaper at 9. 5x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: WaFd, Inc. wins at 3. 50x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 's 4. 23x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIBK or COLB or GBCI or WAFD?
Over the past 5 years, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) delivered a total return of +24. 2%, compared to -13. 9% for Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GBCI returned +134. 1% versus FIBK's +39. 2%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIBK or COLB or GBCI or WAFD?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 79β versus Columbia Banking System, Inc. 's 1. 36β — meaning COLB is approximately 73% more volatile than WAFD relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 23% versus 69% for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIBK or COLB or GBCI or WAFD?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Glacier Bancorp, Inc.
(GBCI) is pulling ahead at 14. 5% versus -28. 5% for First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. grew EPS 34. 2% year-over-year, compared to -9. 8% for Columbia Banking System, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIBK or COLB or GBCI or WAFD?
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc.
(FIBK) is the more profitable company, earning 28. 5% net margin versus 16. 0% for WaFd, Inc. — meaning it keeps 28. 5% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FIBK leads at 37. 0% versus 20. 5% for WAFD. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIBK leads at 97. 5%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIBK or COLB or GBCI or WAFD more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, WaFd, Inc. (WAFD) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 50x versus First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. 's 4. 23x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Columbia Banking System, Inc. (COLB) trades at 9. 5x forward P/E versus 15. 1x for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. — 5. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GBCI: 23. 0% to $57. 33.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIBK or COLB or GBCI or WAFD?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
First Interstate BancSystem, Inc. (FIBK) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 2. 7% for Glacier Bancorp, Inc. (GBCI).
09Is FIBK or COLB or GBCI or WAFD better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, WaFd, Inc.
(WAFD) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 79), 3. 0% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (WAFD: +80. 5%, FIBK: +39. 2%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIBK and COLB and GBCI and WAFD?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FIBK is a small-cap deep-value stock; COLB is a small-cap deep-value stock; GBCI is a small-cap quality compounder stock; WAFD is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.