Communication Equipment
Compare Stocks
4 / 10Stock Comparison
FIEE vs GE vs EMR vs RTX
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Aerospace & Defense
Industrial - Machinery
Aerospace & Defense
FIEE vs GE vs EMR vs RTX — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Industry | Communication Equipment | Aerospace & Defense | Industrial - Machinery | Aerospace & Defense |
| Market Cap | $24M | $316.20B | $79.02B | $238.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2M | $48.35B | $18.32B | $90.37B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-1M | $8.66B | $2.44B | $7.26B |
| Gross Margin | 83.0% | 34.8% | 52.7% | 20.2% |
| Operating Margin | -48.4% | 18.5% | 19.8% | 10.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 40.0x | 21.7x | 25.5x |
| Total Debt | $0.00 | $20.49B | $13.76B | $39.51B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $30K | $12.39B | $1.54B | $7.43B |
FIEE vs GE vs EMR vs RTX — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FiEE, Inc. (FIEE) | 100 | 12.0 | -88.0% |
| GE Aerospace (GE) | 100 | 925.2 | +825.2% |
| Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) | 100 | 231.2 | +131.2% |
| RTX Corporation (RTX) | 100 | 274.0 | +174.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIEE vs GE vs EMR vs RTX
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIEE is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +486.4% vs EMR's +30.4%
GE carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and valuation efficiency.
- Rev growth 18.5%, EPS growth 36.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 16.3%
- PEG 3.39 vs EMR's 4.81
- 18.5% revenue growth vs FIEE's -97.5%
- 17.9% margin vs FIEE's -56.4%
EMR is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability is your priority.
- Dividend streak 37 yrs, beta 1.52, yield 1.5%
- Lower P/E (21.7x vs 25.5x)
- 1.5% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend)
RTX is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding and sleep-well-at-night.
- 234.7% 10Y total return vs GE's 121.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.51, Low D/E 58.8%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.51, yield 1.5%, current ratio 1.03x
- Beta 0.51 vs FIEE's 2.38
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 18.5% revenue growth vs FIEE's -97.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (21.7x vs 25.5x) | |
| Quality / Margins | 17.9% margin vs FIEE's -56.4% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.51 vs FIEE's 2.38 | |
| Dividends | 1.5% yield, 37-year raise streak, vs GE's 0.4%, (1 stock pays no dividend) | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +486.4% vs EMR's +30.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 6.8% ROA vs FIEE's -13.2% |
FIEE vs GE vs EMR vs RTX — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FIEE vs GE vs EMR vs RTX — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 4 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Who Leads Where
EMR leads in 2 of 6 categories
GE leads 2 • FIEE leads 1 • RTX leads 0 • 1 tied
Explore the data ↓Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIEE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RTX is the larger business by revenue, generating $90.4B annually — 45535.8x FIEE's $2M. GE is the more profitable business, keeping 17.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIEE's -56.4%. On growth, GE holds the edge at +24.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2M | $48.4B | $18.3B | $90.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$643,800 | $9.9B | $4.7B | $13.8B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$1M | $8.7B | $2.4B | $7.3B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2M | $7.5B | $3.1B | $8.4B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +83.0% | +34.8% | +52.7% | +20.2% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -48.4% | +18.5% | +19.8% | +10.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -56.4% | +17.9% | +13.3% | +8.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +125.2% | +15.4% | +17.0% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | +24.7% | +2.9% | +8.7% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +81.8% | -1.1% | +28.2% | +32.5% |
Valuation Metrics
EMR leads this category, winning 3 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 34.9x trailing earnings, EMR trades at a 6% valuation discount to GE's 37.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), GE offers better value at 3.14x vs EMR's 7.73x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24M | $316.2B | $79.0B | $238.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $24M | $324.3B | $91.2B | $270.1B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -4.81x | 37.09x | 34.92x | 35.64x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 40.02x | 21.71x | 25.54x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 3.14x | 7.73x | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 32.46x | 18.07x | 20.96x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 37.43x | 6.90x | 4.39x | 2.69x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | — | 17.09x | 3.94x | 3.57x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 43.53x | 29.63x | 29.98x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GE leads this category, winning 4 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GE delivers a 45.8% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $46 in annual profit, vs $-29 for FIEE. RTX carries lower financial leverage with a 0.59x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to GE's 1.08x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), RTX scores 8/9 vs FIEE's 3/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -28.6% | +45.8% | +12.1% | +10.9% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -13.2% | +6.8% | +5.8% | +4.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | — | +24.7% | +8.2% | +6.7% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | — | +9.6% | +10.0% | +7.9% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 | 7 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | — | 1.08x | 0.68x | 0.59x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$30,162 | $8.1B | $12.2B | $32.1B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $30,162 | $12.4B | $1.5B | $7.4B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $0 | $20.5B | $13.8B | $39.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -365.59x | 11.69x | 6.46x | 5.58x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GE leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GE five years ago would be worth $46,249 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $875 for FIEE. Over the past 12 months, FIEE leads with a +486.4% total return vs EMR's +30.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GE at 56.0% vs FIEE's 14.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +86.4% | -5.5% | +4.3% | -5.2% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +486.4% | +44.9% | +30.4% | +40.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +50.7% | +280.0% | +75.9% | +93.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -91.3% | +362.5% | +59.5% | +120.1% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -88.5% | +121.0% | +206.6% | +234.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +14.6% | +56.0% | +20.7% | +24.5% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — GE and RTX each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
RTX is the less volatile stock with a 0.51 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIEE's 2.38 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GE currently trades 86.8% from its 52-week high vs FIEE's 81.1% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.38x | 1.14x | 1.52x | 0.51x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.95 | $348.48 | $165.15 | $214.50 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $1.01 | $208.22 | $108.37 | $126.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +81.1% | +86.8% | +85.4% | +82.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 40.4 | 56.4 | 61.3 | 37.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 16K | 5.7M | 2.8M | 5.3M |
Analyst Outlook
EMR leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Analyst consensus: GE as "Buy", EMR as "Buy", RTX as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 27.6% upside for GE (target: $386) vs 14.8% for EMR (target: $162). For income investors, EMR offers the higher dividend yield at 1.49% vs GE's 0.45%.
| Metric | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | — | Buy | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | — | $386.20 | $161.92 | $224.89 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | — | 34 | 41 | 26 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.4% | +1.5% | +1.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 2 | 37 | 4 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.36 | $2.10 | $2.63 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +2.4% | +1.6% | +0.0% |
EMR leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook). GE leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 1 tied.
FIEE vs GE vs EMR vs RTX: Key Questions Answered
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIEE or GE or EMR or RTX a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Aerospace (GE) is the stronger pick with 18.
5% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -97. 5% for FiEE, Inc. (FIEE). Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) offers the better valuation at 34. 9x trailing P/E (21. 7x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Aerospace (GE) a "Buy" — based on 34 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIEE or GE or EMR or RTX?
On trailing P/E, Emerson Electric Co.
(EMR) is the cheapest at 34. 9x versus GE Aerospace at 37. 1x. On forward P/E, Emerson Electric Co. is actually cheaper at 21. 7x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: GE Aerospace wins at 3. 39x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIEE or GE or EMR or RTX?
Over the past 5 years, GE Aerospace (GE) delivered a total return of +362.
5%, compared to -91. 3% for FiEE, Inc. (FIEE). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RTX returned +234. 7% versus FIEE's -88. 5%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIEE or GE or EMR or RTX?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), RTX Corporation (RTX) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
51β versus FiEE, Inc. 's 2. 38β — meaning FIEE is approximately 366% more volatile than RTX relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, RTX Corporation (RTX) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 59% versus 108% for GE Aerospace — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIEE or GE or EMR or RTX?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Aerospace (GE) is pulling ahead at 18.
5% versus -97. 5% for FiEE, Inc. (FIEE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: FiEE, Inc. grew EPS 85. 2% year-over-year, compared to 17. 8% for Emerson Electric Co.. Over a 3-year CAGR, GE leads at 16. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIEE or GE or EMR or RTX?
GE Aerospace (GE) is the more profitable company, earning 19.
0% net margin versus -660. 2% for FiEE, Inc. — meaning it keeps 19. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: EMR leads at 19. 6% versus -661. 9% for FIEE. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — EMR leads at 52. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIEE or GE or EMR or RTX more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, GE Aerospace (GE) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 3. 39x versus Emerson Electric Co. 's 4. 81x. Both stocks trade at elevated growth-adjusted valuations, so expected growth needs to materialise. On forward earnings alone, Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) trades at 21. 7x forward P/E versus 40. 0x for GE Aerospace — 18. 3x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GE: 27. 6% to $386. 20.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIEE or GE or EMR or RTX?
In this comparison, EMR (1.
5% yield), RTX (1. 5% yield), GE (0. 4% yield) pay a dividend. FIEE does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
09Is FIEE or GE or EMR or RTX better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, RTX Corporation (RTX) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
51), 1. 5% yield, +234. 7% 10Y return). FiEE, Inc. (FIEE) carries a higher beta of 2. 38 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (RTX: +234. 7%, FIEE: -88. 5%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIEE and GE and EMR and RTX?
These companies operate in different sectors (FIEE (Technology) and GE (Industrials) and EMR (Industrials) and RTX (Industrials)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FIEE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; GE is a large-cap high-growth stock; EMR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock; RTX is a large-cap quality compounder stock. EMR, RTX pay a dividend while FIEE, GE do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.