Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FIP vs BIP
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Diversified Utilities
FIP vs BIP — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Diversified Utilities |
| Market Cap | $606M | $17.07B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $595M | $24.01B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-393M | $417M |
| Gross Margin | 9.1% | 27.0% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 25.2% |
| Forward P/E | — | 30.9x |
| Total Debt | $3.93B | $64.50B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $326M | $3.20B |
FIP vs BIP — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FTAI Infrastructure… (FIP) | 100 | 139.0 | +39.0% |
| Brookfield Infrastr… (BIP) | 100 | 92.7 | -7.3% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIP vs BIP
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 51.6%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- 51.6% revenue growth vs BIP's 9.8%
BIP carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 15 yrs, beta 0.63, yield 10.3%
- 195.1% 10Y total return vs FIP's 84.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.63, current ratio 2.48x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.6% revenue growth vs BIP's 9.8% | |
| Quality / Margins | 1.7% margin vs FIP's -66.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.63 vs FIP's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 10.3% yield, 15-year raise streak, vs FIP's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +22.3% vs FIP's +15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 0.3% ROA vs FIP's -7.4%, ROIC 4.8% vs 0.9% |
FIP vs BIP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FIP vs BIP — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
Evenly matched — FIP and BIP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
BIP is the larger business by revenue, generating $24.0B annually — 40.4x FIP's $595M. BIP is the more profitable business, keeping 1.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIP's -66.1%. On growth, FIP holds the edge at +95.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $595M | $24.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $10.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$393M | $417M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$101M | -$13.7B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +27.0% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +25.2% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -66.1% | +1.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | -57.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | +16.9% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | -6.2% |
Valuation Metrics
BIP leads this category, winning 3 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, BIP's 8.0x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than FIP's 24.5x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $606M | $17.1B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $78.4B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.27x | 37.69x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 30.91x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | 1.12x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.45x | 7.98x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 0.74x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 0.48x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
BIP leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BIP delivers a 1.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $1 in annual profit, vs $-43 for FIP. BIP carries lower financial leverage with a 1.82x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIP's 4.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BIP scores 8/9 vs FIP's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.7% | +1.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.4% | +0.3% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +4.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +5.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.16x | 1.82x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $61.3B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $326M | $3.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $64.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.08x | 1.81x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
Evenly matched — FIP and BIP each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FIP five years ago would be worth $18,400 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $12,535 for BIP. Over the past 12 months, BIP leads with a +22.3% total return vs FIP's +15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors FIP at 20.4% vs BIP's 5.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.7% | +9.0% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +22.3% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.4% | +17.8% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.0% | +25.3% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.0% | +195.1% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.4% | +5.6% |
Risk & Volatility
BIP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BIP is the less volatile stock with a 0.63 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIP's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. BIP currently trades 91.6% from its 52-week high vs FIP's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 0.63x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.94 | $40.32 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.90 | $29.63 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +91.6% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 56.9 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 986K | 1.0M |
Analyst Outlook
BIP leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FIP as "Buy" and BIP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.5% upside for FIP (target: $12) vs 25.1% for BIP (target: $46). For income investors, BIP offers the higher dividend yield at 10.26% vs FIP's 2.34%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.67 | $46.20 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 16 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +10.3% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 15 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $3.79 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +73.8% | +1.1% |
BIP leads in 4 of 6 categories — strongest in Valuation Metrics and Profitability & Efficiency. 2 categories are tied.
FIP vs BIP: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIP or BIP a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FTAI Infrastructure Inc.
(FIP) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 9. 8% for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP). Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) offers the better valuation at 37. 7x trailing P/E (30. 9x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FIP or BIP?
Over the past 5 years, FTAI Infrastructure Inc.
(FIP) delivered a total return of +84. 0%, compared to +25. 3% for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BIP returned +195. 1% versus FIP's +84. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FIP or BIP?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 63β versus FTAI Infrastructure Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning FIP is approximately 226% more volatile than BIP relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 182% versus 4% for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FIP or BIP?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FTAI Infrastructure Inc.
(FIP) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus 9. 8% for Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. grew EPS 716. 7% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for FTAI Infrastructure Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIP leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FIP or BIP?
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is the more profitable company, earning 1. 9% net margin versus -21. 3% for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. — meaning it keeps 1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BIP leads at 25. 1% versus 7. 9% for FIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — BIP leads at 26. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FIP or BIP more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIP: 127.
5% to $11. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — FIP or BIP?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L. P. (BIP) offers the highest yield at 10. 3%, versus 2. 3% for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP).
08Is FIP or BIP better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners L.
P. (BIP) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 63), 10. 3% yield, +195. 1% 10Y return). FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (BIP: +195. 1%, FIP: +84. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FIP and BIP?
These companies operate in different sectors (FIP (Industrials) and BIP (Utilities)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
In terms of investment character: FIP is a small-cap high-growth stock; BIP is a mid-cap income-oriented stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.