Conglomerates
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FIP vs GLNG
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Oil & Gas Midstream
FIP vs GLNG — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Conglomerates | Oil & Gas Midstream |
| Market Cap | $606M | $5.75B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $595M | $394M |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-393M | $66M |
| Gross Margin | 9.1% | 46.9% |
| Operating Margin | 7.2% | 34.4% |
| Forward P/E | — | 69.3x |
| Total Debt | $3.93B | $2.76B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $326M | $1.18B |
FIP vs GLNG — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Jul 22 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| FTAI Infrastructure… (FIP) | 100 | 139.0 | +39.0% |
| Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) | 100 | 246.0 | +146.0% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIP vs GLNG
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIP is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure.
- Rev growth 51.6%, EPS growth 16.9%, 3Y rev CAGR 24.3%
- 51.6% revenue growth vs GLNG's 51.1%
GLNG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and long-term compounding.
- Dividend streak 5 yrs, beta 0.19, yield 5.5%
- 243.7% 10Y total return vs FIP's 84.0%
- Lower volatility, beta 0.19, current ratio 2.55x
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 51.6% revenue growth vs GLNG's 51.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 16.7% margin vs FIP's -66.1% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.19 vs FIP's 2.04, lower leverage | |
| Dividends | 5.5% yield, 5-year raise streak, vs FIP's 2.3% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +43.7% vs FIP's +15.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 1.2% ROA vs FIP's -7.4%, ROIC 2.9% vs 0.9% |
FIP vs GLNG — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FIP vs GLNG — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GLNG leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIP is the larger business by revenue, generating $595M annually — 1.5x GLNG's $394M. GLNG is the more profitable business, keeping 16.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIP's -66.1%. On growth, GLNG holds the edge at +101.5% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $595M | $394M |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$32M | $185M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$393M | $66M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$101M | -$430M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +9.1% | +46.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +7.2% | +34.4% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -66.1% | +16.7% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -17.0% | -109.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +95.9% | +101.5% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -2.5% | +2.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FIP leads this category, winning 4 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FIP's 24.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GLNG's 39.7x.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $606M | $5.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $4.2B | $7.3B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -2.27x | 84.66x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 69.28x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 24.45x | 39.69x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.21x | 14.62x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.63x | 2.70x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
GLNG leads this category, winning 9 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GLNG delivers a 3.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $3 in annual profit, vs $-43 for FIP. GLNG carries lower financial leverage with a 1.33x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FIP's 4.16x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GLNG scores 8/9 vs FIP's 2/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -42.7% | +3.2% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -7.4% | +1.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +0.9% | +2.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +1.3% | +3.3% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 2 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 4.16x | 1.33x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.6B | $1.6B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $326M | $1.2B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $3.9B | $2.8B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.08x | 4.50x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GLNG leads this category, winning 6 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GLNG five years ago would be worth $50,681 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $18,400 for FIP. Over the past 12 months, GLNG leads with a +43.7% total return vs FIP's +15.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GLNG at 39.9% vs FIP's 20.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +5.7% | +45.7% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +15.4% | +43.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +74.4% | +173.7% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.0% | +406.8% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | +84.0% | +243.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | +20.4% | +39.9% |
Risk & Volatility
GLNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.19 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIP's 2.04 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GLNG currently trades 96.1% from its 52-week high vs FIP's 64.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 2.04x | 0.19x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $7.94 | $57.29 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.90 | $35.02 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +64.6% | +96.1% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.1 | 56.3 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 986K | 2.1M |
Analyst Outlook
GLNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FIP as "Buy" and GLNG as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 127.5% upside for FIP (target: $12) vs -3.7% for GLNG (target: $53). For income investors, GLNG offers the higher dividend yield at 5.49% vs FIP's 2.34%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $11.67 | $53.00 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 4 | 48 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +2.3% | +5.5% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 5 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.12 | $3.02 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +73.8% | +2.5% |
GLNG leads in 5 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FIP leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FIP vs GLNG: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIP or GLNG a better buy right now?
For growth investors, FTAI Infrastructure Inc.
(FIP) is the stronger pick with 51. 6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 51. 1% for Golar LNG Limited (GLNG). Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) offers the better valuation at 84. 7x trailing P/E (69. 3x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FIP or GLNG?
Over the past 5 years, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) delivered a total return of +406.
8%, compared to +84. 0% for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GLNG returned +243. 7% versus FIP's +84. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FIP or GLNG?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0.
19β versus FTAI Infrastructure Inc. 's 2. 04β — meaning FIP is approximately 956% more volatile than GLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 133% versus 4% for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FIP or GLNG?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), FTAI Infrastructure Inc.
(FIP) is pulling ahead at 51. 6% versus 51. 1% for Golar LNG Limited (GLNG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Golar LNG Limited grew EPS 35. 4% year-over-year, compared to 16. 9% for FTAI Infrastructure Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FIP leads at 24. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FIP or GLNG?
Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the more profitable company, earning 16.
7% net margin versus -21. 3% for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. — meaning it keeps 16. 7% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GLNG leads at 34. 4% versus 7. 9% for FIP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GLNG leads at 46. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FIP or GLNG more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FIP: 127.
5% to $11. 67.
07Which pays a better dividend — FIP or GLNG?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) offers the highest yield at 5. 5%, versus 2. 3% for FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP).
08Is FIP or GLNG better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Golar LNG Limited (GLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0.
19), 5. 5% yield, +243. 7% 10Y return). FTAI Infrastructure Inc. (FIP) carries a higher beta of 2. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GLNG: +243. 7%, FIP: +84. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FIP and GLNG?
These companies operate in different sectors (FIP (Industrials) and GLNG (Energy)), which means they face different economic cycles, regulatory environments, and macro sensitivities — making direct comparison nuanced.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.