Information Technology Services
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FIS vs BR
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Information Technology Services
FIS vs BR — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Information Technology Services | Information Technology Services |
| Market Cap | $24.14B | $17.76B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $10.89B | $7.32B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $382M | $1.10B |
| Gross Margin | 38.1% | 31.3% |
| Operating Margin | 17.5% | 17.1% |
| Forward P/E | 7.4x | 16.0x |
| Total Debt | $4.01B | $3.46B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $599M | $562M |
FIS vs BR — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fidelity National I… (FIS) | 100 | 33.6 | -66.4% |
| Broadridge Financia… (BR) | 100 | 125.6 | +25.6% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FIS vs BR
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FIS is the clearest fit if your priority is valuation efficiency.
- PEG 0.30 vs BR's 1.29
- Lower P/E (7.4x vs 16.0x), PEG 0.30 vs 1.29
- 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BR's 2.2%
BR carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 18 yrs, beta 0.22, yield 2.2%
- Rev growth 5.9%, EPS growth 21.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 6.5%
- 198.9% 10Y total return vs FIS's -12.4%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 5.9% revenue growth vs FIS's 5.4% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (7.4x vs 16.0x), PEG 0.30 vs 1.29 | |
| Quality / Margins | 15.0% margin vs FIS's 3.5% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 0.22 vs FIS's 0.76 | |
| Dividends | 3.5% yield, 1-year raise streak, vs BR's 2.2% | |
| Momentum (1Y) | -32.8% vs FIS's -38.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 12.8% ROA vs FIS's 1.1%, ROIC 16.2% vs 6.0% |
FIS vs BR — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FIS vs BR — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FIS and BR operate at a comparable scale, with $10.9B and $7.3B in trailing revenue. BR is the more profitable business, keeping 15.0% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FIS's 3.5%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $10.9B | $7.3B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $3.8B | $1.7B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | $382M | $1.1B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $2.8B | $1.3B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +38.1% | +31.3% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +17.5% | +17.1% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | +3.5% | +15.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +26.1% | +17.7% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +8.2% | +7.8% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +92.3% | +15.1% |
Valuation Metrics
FIS leads this category, winning 5 of 7 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
At 21.4x trailing earnings, BR trades at a 66% valuation discount to FIS's 62.1x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), BR offers better value at 1.72x vs FIS's 2.55x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $24.1B | $17.8B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.6B | $20.7B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | 62.15x | 21.43x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 7.43x | 16.02x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | 2.55x | 1.72x |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 7.56x | 12.25x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 2.26x | 2.58x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.74x | 6.78x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 9.84x | 16.81x |
Profitability & Efficiency
BR leads this category, winning 8 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
BR delivers a 40.1% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $40 in annual profit, vs $3 for FIS. FIS carries lower financial leverage with a 0.29x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to BR's 1.30x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), BR scores 8/9 vs FIS's 6/9, reflecting strong financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | +2.7% | +40.1% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | +1.1% | +12.8% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +6.0% | +16.2% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +6.6% | +17.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 6 | 8 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.29x | 1.30x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $3.4B | $2.9B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $599M | $562M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $4.0B | $3.5B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 4.64x | 13.54x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
BR leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in BR five years ago would be worth $10,168 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,723 for FIS. Over the past 12 months, BR leads with a -32.8% total return vs FIS's -38.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors BR at 2.1% vs FIS's -2.5% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -28.3% | -30.6% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -38.4% | -32.8% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -7.4% | +6.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -62.8% | +1.7% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -12.4% | +198.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -2.5% | +2.1% |
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FIS and BR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
BR is the less volatile stock with a 0.22 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FIS's 0.76 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 0.76x | 0.22x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $82.74 | $271.91 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $43.30 | $149.05 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +56.3% | +56.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 50.4 | 38.7 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 5.4M | 1.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Evenly matched — FIS and BR each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FIS as "Buy" and BR as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 57.5% upside for BR (target: $240) vs 44.6% for FIS (target: $67). For income investors, FIS offers the higher dividend yield at 3.50% vs BR's 2.24%.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $67.38 | $239.60 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 37 | 24 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +3.5% | +2.2% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | 18 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $1.63 | $3.40 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +0.8% |
FIS leads in 2 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). BR leads in 2 (Profitability & Efficiency, Total Returns). 2 tied.
FIS vs BR: Frequently Asked Questions
10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FIS or BR a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is the stronger pick with 5. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR) offers the better valuation at 21. 4x trailing P/E (16. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) a "Buy" — based on 37 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which has the better valuation — FIS or BR?
On trailing P/E, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is the cheapest at 21. 4x versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. at 62. 1x. On forward P/E, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. is actually cheaper at 7. 4x — notably different from the trailing picture, reflecting expected earnings growth. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. wins at 0. 30x versus Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 29x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.
03Which is the better long-term investment — FIS or BR?
Over the past 5 years, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) delivered a total return of +1. 7%, compared to -62. 8% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: BR returned +198. 9% versus FIS's -12. 4%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
04Which is safer — FIS or BR?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 22β versus Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. 's 0. 76β — meaning FIS is approximately 249% more volatile than BR relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 29% versus 130% for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
05Which is growing faster — FIS or BR?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is pulling ahead at 5. 9% versus 5. 4% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. grew EPS 21. 2% year-over-year, compared to -47. 2% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, BR leads at 6. 5% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
06Which has better profit margins — FIS or BR?
Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 2% net margin versus 3. 6% for Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 2% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: BR leads at 17. 3% versus 16. 5% for FIS. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FIS leads at 36. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
07Is FIS or BR more undervalued right now?
The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.
By this metric, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 30x versus Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. 's 1. 29x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) trades at 7. 4x forward P/E versus 16. 0x for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. — 8. 6x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for BR: 57. 5% to $239. 60.
08Which pays a better dividend — FIS or BR?
All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. (FIS) offers the highest yield at 3. 5%, versus 2. 2% for Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (BR).
09Is FIS or BR better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc.
(BR) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 22), 2. 2% yield, +198. 9% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (BR: +198. 9%, FIS: -12. 4%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
10What are the main differences between FIS and BR?
Both stocks operate in the Technology sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FIS is a mid-cap income-oriented stock; BR is a mid-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.