Banks - Regional
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLG vs RKT
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Financial - Mortgages
FLG vs RKT — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Banks - Regional | Financial - Mortgages |
| Market Cap | $5.94B | $39.90B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $4.70B | $6.88B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-177M | $-68M |
| Gross Margin | 37.6% | 91.6% |
| Operating Margin | -4.2% | 8.7% |
| Forward P/E | 31.7x | 19.3x |
| Total Debt | $12.18B | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $553M | $2.70B |
FLG vs RKT — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Aug 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flagstar Financial,… (FLG) | 100 | 52.6 | -47.4% |
| Rocket Companies, I… (RKT) | 100 | 50.5 | -49.5% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLG vs RKT
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLG carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and sleep-well-at-night.
- Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.01, yield 0.3%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.01, current ratio 0.54x
- Beta 1.01, yield 0.3%, current ratio 0.54x
RKT is the clearest fit if your priority is growth exposure and long-term compounding.
- Rev growth 27.4%, EPS growth -123.8%
- -20.7% 10Y total return vs FLG's -32.1%
- 27.4% NII/revenue growth vs FLG's -26.5%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 27.4% NII/revenue growth vs FLG's -26.5% | |
| Value | Lower P/E (19.3x vs 31.7x) | |
| Quality / Margins | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs RKT's 0.8% (lower = leaner) | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.01 vs RKT's 1.77 | |
| Dividends | 0.3% yield; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +21.6% vs FLG's +18.8% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | Efficiency ratio 0.4% vs RKT's 0.8% |
FLG vs RKT — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
Segment breakdown not available.
FLG vs RKT — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
RKT and FLG operate at a comparable scale, with $6.9B and $4.7B in trailing revenue. Profitability is closely matched — net margins range from -1.0% (RKT) to -3.8% (FLG).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $4.7B | $6.9B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$85M | $639M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$177M | -$68M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$237M | -$4.1B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +37.6% | +91.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -4.2% | +8.7% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -3.8% | -1.0% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -12.8% | -58.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | — | — |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +108.5% | -89.6% |
Valuation Metrics
Evenly matched — FLG and RKT each lead in 2 of 4 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $5.9B | $39.9B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $17.6B | $37.2B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -28.02x | -282.60x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 31.68x | 19.30x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 41.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.27x | 5.80x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 0.73x | 0.82x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | — |
Profitability & Efficiency
RKT leads this category, winning 7 of 8 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
RKT delivers a -0.6% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-1 in annual profit, vs $-2 for FLG. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLG scores 4/9 vs RKT's 2/9, reflecting mixed financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -2.2% | -0.6% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -0.2% | -0.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -0.7% | +2.0% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -0.5% | +1.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 2 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.50x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $11.6B | -$2.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $553M | $2.7B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $12.2B | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -0.07x | 0.43x |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
RKT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in RKT five years ago would be worth $8,811 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,515 for FLG. Over the past 12 months, RKT leads with a +21.6% total return vs FLG's +18.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors RKT at 21.0% vs FLG's -19.6% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | +13.9% | -28.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +18.8% | +21.6% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -48.0% | +77.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -44.8% | -11.9% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -32.1% | -20.7% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -19.6% | +21.0% |
Risk & Volatility
FLG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLG is the less volatile stock with a 1.01 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than RKT's 1.77 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. FLG currently trades 95.9% from its 52-week high vs RKT's 58.0% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.01x | 1.77x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $14.90 | $24.36 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $10.38 | $11.08 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +95.9% | +58.0% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 61.2 | 45.8 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.7M | 25.0M |
Analyst Outlook
RKT leads this category, winning 1 of 1 comparable metric.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLG as "Buy" and RKT as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 53.1% upside for RKT (target: $22) vs 9.0% for FLG (target: $16). FLG is the only dividend payer here at 0.25% yield — a key consideration for income-focused portfolios.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Hold |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $15.58 | $21.63 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 14 | 25 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | +0.3% | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 0 | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | $0.04 | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | 0.0% |
RKT leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLG leads in 1 (Risk & Volatility). 1 tied.
FLG vs RKT: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLG or RKT a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is the stronger pick with 27. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -26. 5% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG). Analysts rate Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG) a "Buy" — based on 14 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLG or RKT?
Over the past 5 years, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) delivered a total return of -11. 9%, compared to -44. 8% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: RKT returned -20. 7% versus FLG's -32. 1%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLG or RKT?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flagstar Financial, Inc.
(FLG) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 01β versus Rocket Companies, Inc. 's 1. 77β — meaning RKT is approximately 76% more volatile than FLG relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FLG or RKT?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is pulling ahead at 27. 4% versus -26. 5% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. (FLG). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Flagstar Financial, Inc. grew EPS 85. 4% year-over-year, compared to -123. 8% for Rocket Companies, Inc.. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLG or RKT?
Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) is the more profitable company, earning -1. 0% net margin versus -3. 8% for Flagstar Financial, Inc. — meaning it keeps -1. 0% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: RKT leads at 8. 7% versus -4. 2% for FLG. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — RKT leads at 91. 6%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FLG or RKT more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Rocket Companies, Inc.
(RKT) trades at 19. 3x forward P/E versus 31. 7x for Flagstar Financial, Inc. — 12. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for RKT: 53. 1% to $21. 63.
07Which pays a better dividend — FLG or RKT?
In this comparison, FLG (0.
3% yield) pays a dividend. RKT does not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.
08Is FLG or RKT better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flagstar Financial, Inc.
(FLG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1. 01)). Rocket Companies, Inc. (RKT) carries a higher beta of 1. 77 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLG: -32. 1%, RKT: -20. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FLG and RKT?
Both stocks operate in the Financial Services sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLG is a small-cap quality compounder stock; RKT is a mid-cap high-growth stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.