Renewable Utilities
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Stock Comparison
FLNC vs GEV
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
Renewable Utilities
FLNC vs GEV — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | ||
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Renewable Utilities | Renewable Utilities |
| Market Cap | $654M | $294.30B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $2.55B | $39.38B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-52M | $9.38B |
| Gross Margin | 11.7% | 19.9% |
| Operating Margin | -1.6% | 3.9% |
| Forward P/E | — | 39.4x |
| Total Debt | $391M | $0.00 |
| Cash & Equiv. | $691M | $8.85B |
FLNC vs GEV — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
| Stock | Mar 24 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) | 100 | 73.2 | -26.8% |
| GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) | 100 | 800.9 | +700.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLNC vs GEV
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
FLNC is the clearest fit if your priority is momentum.
- +197.9% vs GEV's +173.4%
GEV carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.76, yield 0.1%
- Rev growth 8.9%, EPS growth 217.0%, 3Y rev CAGR 8.7%
- 7.4% 10Y total return vs FLNC's -63.7%
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | 8.9% revenue growth vs FLNC's -16.1% | |
| Quality / Margins | 23.8% margin vs FLNC's -2.0% | |
| Stability / Safety | Beta 1.76 vs FLNC's 3.55 | |
| Dividends | 0.1% yield; 1-year raise streak; the other pay no meaningful dividend | |
| Momentum (1Y) | +197.9% vs GEV's +173.4% | |
| Efficiency (ROA) | 15.2% ROA vs FLNC's -2.3%, ROIC 27.9% vs -12.0% |
FLNC vs GEV — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FLNC vs GEV — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
GEV is the larger business by revenue, generating $39.4B annually — 15.4x FLNC's $2.6B. GEV is the more profitable business, keeping 23.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLNC's -2.0%. On growth, FLNC holds the edge at +154.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $2.6B | $39.4B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | -$12M | $2.2B |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$52M | $9.4B |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | -$195M | $3.6B |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +11.7% | +19.9% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | -1.6% | +3.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.0% | +23.8% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | -7.6% | +9.2% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +154.4% | +16.1% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -6.3% | +18.2% |
Valuation Metrics
FLNC leads this category, winning 3 of 3 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $654M | $294.3B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $354M | $285.5B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -34.30x | 61.91x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | — | 39.40x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | — | 127.38x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 0.29x | 7.73x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 3.01x | 24.58x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | — | 79.31x |
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV leads this category, winning 7 of 7 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
GEV delivers a 79.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $80 in annual profit, vs $-11 for FLNC. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GEV scores 6/9 vs FLNC's 3/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -10.6% | +79.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -2.3% | +15.2% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | -12.0% | +27.9% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | -4.3% | +6.6% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 3 | 6 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 0.71x | — |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | -$300M | -$8.8B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $691M | $8.8B |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $391M | $0 |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | -8.49x | — |
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
GEV leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in GEV five years ago would be worth $83,597 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $3,626 for FLNC. Over the past 12 months, FLNC leads with a +197.9% total return vs GEV's +173.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GEV at 103.0% vs FLNC's -10.9% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -44.9% | +61.3% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | +197.9% | +173.4% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -29.2% | +736.0% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.7% | +736.0% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -63.7% | +736.0% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -10.9% | +103.0% |
Risk & Volatility
GEV leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
GEV is the less volatile stock with a 1.76 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLNC's 3.55 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GEV currently trades 92.7% from its 52-week high vs FLNC's 37.9% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 3.55x | 1.76x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $33.51 | $1181.95 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $3.93 | $387.03 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +37.9% | +92.7% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 38.8 | 61.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 4.2M | 2.4M |
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLNC as "Hold" and GEV as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 50.9% upside for FLNC (target: $19) vs 2.3% for GEV (target: $1120).
| Metric | ||
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Hold | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $19.15 | $1119.95 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 27 | 28 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | +0.1% |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | — | 1 |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | $1.00 |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | 0.0% | +1.1% |
GEV leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLNC leads in 1 (Valuation Metrics).
FLNC vs GEV: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLNC or GEV a better buy right now?
For growth investors, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the stronger pick with 8. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) offers the better valuation at 61. 9x trailing P/E (39. 4x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) a "Buy" — based on 28 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLNC or GEV?
Over the past 5 years, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) delivered a total return of +736. 0%, compared to -63. 7% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GEV returned +736. 0% versus FLNC's -63. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLNC or GEV?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the lower-risk stock at 1. 76β versus Fluence Energy, Inc. 's 3. 55β — meaning FLNC is approximately 102% more volatile than GEV relative to the S&P 500.
04Which is growing faster — FLNC or GEV?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is pulling ahead at 8. 9% versus -16. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: GE Vernova Inc. grew EPS 217. 0% year-over-year, compared to -408. 3% for Fluence Energy, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLNC leads at 23. 6% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLNC or GEV?
GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 8% net margin versus -2. 1% for Fluence Energy, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GEV leads at 3. 6% versus -1. 5% for FLNC. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — GEV leads at 19. 8%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FLNC or GEV more undervalued right now?
Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLNC: 50.
9% to $19. 15.
07Which pays a better dividend — FLNC or GEV?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FLNC or GEV better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, GE Vernova Inc.
(GEV) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (+736. 0% 10Y return). Fluence Energy, Inc. (FLNC) carries a higher beta of 3. 55 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (GEV: +736. 0%, FLNC: -63. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FLNC and GEV?
Both stocks operate in the Utilities sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.