Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLNG vs TNK

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • BM
Market Cap$1.74B
5Y Perf.+600.9%
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.

Oil & Gas Midstream

EnergyNYSE • CA
Market Cap$2.83B
5Y Perf.+367.6%

FLNG vs TNK — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLNG logoFLNG
TNK logoTNK
IndustryOil & Gas MidstreamOil & Gas Midstream
Market Cap$1.74B$2.83B
Revenue (TTM)$348M$952M
Net Income (TTM)$75M$351M
Gross Margin52.9%27.5%
Operating Margin50.6%27.5%
Forward P/E18.5x6.0x
Total Debt$1.85B$55M
Cash & Equiv.$448M$831M

FLNG vs TNKLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLNG
TNK
StockMay 20May 26Return
FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG)100700.9+600.9%
Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)100467.6+367.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLNG vs TNK

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: TNK leads in 4 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. FLEX LNG Ltd. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and capital preservation and lower volatility. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLNG
FLEX LNG Ltd.
The Income Pick

FLNG is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 2 yrs, beta 0.15, yield 9.3%
  • Rev growth -2.4%, EPS growth -36.7%, 3Y rev CAGR -0.0%
  • 240.5% 10Y total return vs TNK's 187.7%
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
TNK
Teekay Tankers Ltd.
The Value Pick

TNK carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for valuation efficiency.

  • PEG 0.19 vs FLNG's 0.33
  • Lower P/E (6.0x vs 18.5x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.33
  • 36.9% margin vs FLNG's 21.5%
Best for: valuation efficiency
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFLNG logoFLNG-2.4% revenue growth vs TNK's -22.6%
ValueTNK logoTNKLower P/E (6.0x vs 18.5x), PEG 0.19 vs 0.33
Quality / MarginsTNK logoTNK36.9% margin vs FLNG's 21.5%
Stability / SafetyFLNG logoFLNGBeta 0.15 vs TNK's 0.35
DividendsFLNG logoFLNG9.3% yield, 2-year raise streak, vs TNK's 2.4%
Momentum (1Y)TNK logoTNK+80.3% vs FLNG's +47.0%
Efficiency (ROA)TNK logoTNK15.7% ROA vs FLNG's 2.9%, ROIC 12.5% vs 6.1%

FLNG vs TNK — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLNGFLEX LNG Ltd.

Segment breakdown not available.

TNKTeekay Tankers Ltd.
FY 2024
Voyage charters
59.3%$1.1B
Voyage Charters - Suezmax
30.4%$547M
Other revenue
7.6%$136M
Time-charter
1.4%$26M
Time Charters - Suezmax
0.7%$13M
Ship-to-ship support services, Other revenue
0.6%$11M

FLNG vs TNK — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLTNKLAGGINGFLNG

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FLNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

TNK is the larger business by revenue, generating $952M annually — 2.7x FLNG's $348M. TNK is the more profitable business, keeping 36.9% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLNG's 21.5%. On growth, FLNG holds the edge at -3.7% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFLNG logoFLNGFLEX LNG Ltd.TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$348M$952M
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$252M$348M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$75M$351M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$133M$113M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+52.9%+27.5%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+50.6%+27.5%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+21.5%+36.9%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+38.4%+11.8%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-3.7%-26.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-52.4%+46.0%
FLNG leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

At 8.0x trailing earnings, TNK trades at a 66% valuation discount to FLNG's 23.4x P/E. Adjusting for growth (PEG ratio), TNK offers better value at 0.26x vs FLNG's 0.42x — a lower PEG means you pay less per unit of expected earnings growth.

MetricFLNG logoFLNGFLEX LNG Ltd.TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
Market CapShares × price$1.7B$2.8B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$3.1B$2.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS23.36x8.05x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.18.53x6.00x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate0.42x0.26x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple12.46x6.80x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue5.02x2.97x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share2.42x1.38x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF12.93x25.09x
TNK leads this category, winning 6 of 7 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

TNK leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

TNK delivers a 17.2% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $17 in annual profit, vs $10 for FLNG. TNK carries lower financial leverage with a 0.03x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLNG's 2.57x.

MetricFLNG logoFLNGFLEX LNG Ltd.TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+10.4%+17.2%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.9%+15.7%
ROICReturn on invested capital+6.1%+12.5%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+7.1%+10.9%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–944
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage2.57x0.03x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$1.4B-$776M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$448M$831M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$1.8B$55M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense1.81x109.95x
TNK leads this category, winning 8 of 8 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in TNK five years ago would be worth $61,384 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $39,349 for FLNG. Over the past 12 months, TNK leads with a +80.3% total return vs FLNG's +47.0%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors TNK at 33.2% vs FLNG's 8.4% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLNG logoFLNGFLEX LNG Ltd.TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+33.7%+58.3%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+47.0%+80.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+27.6%+136.5%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+293.5%+513.8%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends+240.5%+187.7%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return+8.4%+33.2%
TNK leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — FLNG and TNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

FLNG is the less volatile stock with a 0.15 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than TNK's 0.35 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500.

MetricFLNG logoFLNGFLEX LNG Ltd.TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.15x0.35x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$33.40$83.54
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$21.72$41.05
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+96.5%+97.3%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10057.057.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded617K542K
Evenly matched — FLNG and TNK each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FLNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FLNG as "Hold" and TNK as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 10.7% upside for TNK (target: $90) vs -25.6% for FLNG (target: $24). For income investors, FLNG offers the higher dividend yield at 9.31% vs TNK's 2.44%.

MetricFLNG logoFLNGFLEX LNG Ltd.TNK logoTNKTeekay Tankers Lt…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$24.00$90.00
# AnalystsCovering analysts223
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+9.3%+2.4%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises20
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$3.00$1.98
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap0.0%0.0%
FLNG leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

TNK leads in 3 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FLNG leads in 2 (Income & Cash Flow, Analyst Outlook). 1 tied.

Best OverallTeekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLNG vs TNK: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLNG or TNK a better buy right now?

For growth investors, FLEX LNG Ltd.

(FLNG) is the stronger pick with -2. 4% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) offers the better valuation at 8. 0x trailing P/E (6. 0x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) a "Buy" — based on 23 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLNG or TNK?

On trailing P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the cheapest at 8. 0x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. at 23. 4x. On forward P/E, Teekay Tankers Ltd. is actually cheaper at 6. 0x. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is the most growth-adjusted single valuation metric: Teekay Tankers Ltd. wins at 0. 19x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. 's 0. 33x — a PEG below 1. 0 traditionally signals the market is underpricing earnings growth.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLNG or TNK?

Over the past 5 years, Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) delivered a total return of +513. 8%, compared to +293. 5% for FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: FLNG returned +240. 5% versus TNK's +187. 7%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLNG or TNK?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), FLEX LNG Ltd.

(FLNG) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 15β versus Teekay Tankers Ltd. 's 0. 35β — meaning TNK is approximately 130% more volatile than FLNG relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 3% versus 3% for FLEX LNG Ltd. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLNG or TNK?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), FLEX LNG Ltd.

(FLNG) is pulling ahead at -2. 4% versus -22. 6% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: Teekay Tankers Ltd. grew EPS -13. 0% year-over-year, compared to -36. 7% for FLEX LNG Ltd.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLNG leads at -0. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLNG or TNK?

Teekay Tankers Ltd.

(TNK) is the more profitable company, earning 36. 9% net margin versus 21. 5% for FLEX LNG Ltd. — meaning it keeps 36. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLNG leads at 50. 6% versus 22. 6% for TNK. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLNG leads at 52. 9%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLNG or TNK more undervalued right now?

The PEG ratio (forward P/E divided by expected earnings growth rate) is the most precise measure of undervaluation relative to growth potential.

By this metric, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) is the more undervalued stock at a PEG of 0. 19x versus FLEX LNG Ltd. 's 0. 33x. A PEG below 1. 0 is traditionally considered the threshold for growth-adjusted undervaluation. On forward earnings alone, Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK) trades at 6. 0x forward P/E versus 18. 5x for FLEX LNG Ltd. — 12. 5x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for TNK: 10. 7% to $90. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLNG or TNK?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

FLEX LNG Ltd. (FLNG) offers the highest yield at 9. 3%, versus 2. 4% for Teekay Tankers Ltd. (TNK).

09

Is FLNG or TNK better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, FLEX LNG Ltd.

(FLNG) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 15), 9. 3% yield, +240. 5% 10Y return). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLNG: +240. 5%, TNK: +187. 7%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLNG and TNK?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FLNG is a small-cap income-oriented stock; TNK is a small-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FLNG

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 12%
  • Dividend Yield > 3.7%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

TNK

Dividend Mega-Cap Quality

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 22%
  • Dividend Yield > 0.9%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FLNG and TNK on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FLNG: -3.7% · TNK: -26.4%)
Net Margin>
%
(FLNG: 21.5% · TNK: 36.9%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FLNG: 23.4x · TNK: 8.0x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.