Compare Stocks

2 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLO vs GIS

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLO
Flowers Foods, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.82B
5Y Perf.-63.5%
GIS
General Mills, Inc.

Packaged Foods

Consumer DefensiveNYSE • US
Market Cap$18.71B
5Y Perf.-44.4%

FLO vs GIS — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLO logoFLO
GIS logoGIS
IndustryPackaged FoodsPackaged Foods
Market Cap$1.82B$18.71B
Revenue (TTM)$5.26B$18.37B
Net Income (TTM)$84M$2.21B
Gross Margin48.1%33.0%
Operating Margin6.0%19.1%
Forward P/E10.4x10.2x
Total Debt$2.33B$15.30B
Cash & Equiv.$12M$364M

FLO vs GISLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLO
GIS
StockMay 20May 26Return
Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO)10036.5-63.5%
General Mills, Inc. (GIS)10055.6-44.4%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLO vs GIS

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: GIS leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Flowers Foods, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLO
Flowers Foods, Inc.
The Income Pick

FLO is the clearest fit if your priority is income & stability and growth exposure.

  • Dividend streak 19 yrs, beta 0.32, yield 11.4%
  • Rev growth 3.0%, EPS growth -65.8%, 3Y rev CAGR 3.0%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.32, current ratio 0.75x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
GIS
General Mills, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

GIS carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for long-term compounding.

  • -9.4% 10Y total return vs FLO's -13.0%
  • Lower P/E (10.2x vs 10.4x)
  • 12.1% margin vs FLO's 1.6%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFLO logoFLO3.0% revenue growth vs GIS's -1.9%
ValueGIS logoGISLower P/E (10.2x vs 10.4x)
Quality / MarginsGIS logoGIS12.1% margin vs FLO's 1.6%
Stability / SafetyGIS logoGISLower D/E ratio (166.1% vs 178.9%)
DividendsFLO logoFLO11.4% yield, 19-year raise streak, vs GIS's 6.8%
Momentum (1Y)GIS logoGIS-31.3% vs FLO's -44.8%
Efficiency (ROA)GIS logoGIS6.8% ROA vs FLO's 2.0%, ROIC 10.6% vs 8.1%

FLO vs GIS — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLOFlowers Foods, Inc.
FY 2024
Branded Retail
63.9%$3.3B
Other
36.1%$1.8B
GISGeneral Mills, Inc.
FY 2025
Snacks
21.5%$4.2B
Cereal
15.8%$3.1B
Convenient meals
14.5%$2.8B
Pet Segment
13.3%$2.6B
Dough
12.2%$2.4B
Baking mixes and ingredients
10.0%$1.9B
Yogurt
7.1%$1.4B
Other (2)
5.7%$1.1B

FLO vs GIS — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLGISLAGGINGFLO

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

GIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

GIS is the larger business by revenue, generating $18.4B annually — 3.5x FLO's $5.3B. GIS is the more profitable business, keeping 12.1% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to FLO's 1.6%. On growth, FLO holds the edge at +11.0% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…GIS logoGISGeneral Mills, In…
RevenueTrailing 12 months$5.3B$18.4B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$482M$3.9B
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$84M$2.2B
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$329M$1.7B
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+48.1%+33.0%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+6.0%+19.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+1.6%+12.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+6.3%+9.0%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+11.0%-8.4%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-2.6%-50.0%
GIS leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

FLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 8.6x trailing earnings, GIS trades at a 60% valuation discount to FLO's 21.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLO's 8.1x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than GIS's 8.8x.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…GIS logoGISGeneral Mills, In…
Market CapShares × price$1.8B$18.7B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$4.1B$33.6B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS21.55x8.55x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.10.37x10.24x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate2.99x
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple8.08x8.75x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue0.35x0.96x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.40x2.12x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF5.70x8.16x
FLO leads this category, winning 4 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

GIS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

GIS delivers a 23.7% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $24 in annual profit, vs $6 for FLO. GIS carries lower financial leverage with a 1.66x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to FLO's 1.79x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), GIS scores 5/9 vs FLO's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…GIS logoGISGeneral Mills, In…
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+6.4%+23.7%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+2.0%+6.8%
ROICReturn on invested capital+8.1%+10.6%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+11.4%+13.3%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–945
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage1.79x1.66x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$2.3B$14.9B
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$12M$364M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$2.3B$15.3B
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense4.52x5.01x
GIS leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

GIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in GIS five years ago would be worth $7,302 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $5,355 for FLO. Over the past 12 months, GIS leads with a -31.3% total return vs FLO's -44.8%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors GIS at -22.2% vs FLO's -26.2% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…GIS logoGISGeneral Mills, In…
YTD ReturnYear-to-date-17.8%-20.6%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months-44.8%-31.3%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-59.7%-53.0%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-46.5%-27.0%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-13.0%-9.4%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-26.2%-22.2%
GIS leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

GIS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

GIS is the less volatile stock with a -0.04 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than FLO's 0.32 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. GIS currently trades 63.4% from its 52-week high vs FLO's 48.8% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…GIS logoGISGeneral Mills, In…
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5000.32x-0.04x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$17.68$55.35
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$7.86$33.58
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+48.8%+63.4%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10049.136.4
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded5.0M8.6M
GIS leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

FLO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.

Wall Street rates FLO as "Hold" and GIS as "Hold". Consensus price targets imply 32.8% upside for GIS (target: $47) vs 16.0% for FLO (target: $10). For income investors, FLO offers the higher dividend yield at 11.45% vs GIS's 6.85%.

MetricFLO logoFLOFlowers Foods, In…GIS logoGISGeneral Mills, In…
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellHoldHold
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$10.00$46.58
# AnalystsCovering analysts2034
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+11.4%+6.8%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises195
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.99$2.40
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+0.3%+6.4%
FLO leads this category, winning 2 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

GIS leads in 4 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Profitability & Efficiency). FLO leads in 2 (Valuation Metrics, Analyst Outlook).

Best OverallGeneral Mills, Inc. (GIS)Leads 4 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLO vs GIS: Frequently Asked Questions

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLO or GIS a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flowers Foods, Inc.

(FLO) is the stronger pick with 3. 0% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -1. 9% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS). General Mills, Inc. (GIS) offers the better valuation at 8. 6x trailing P/E (10. 2x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) a "Hold" — based on 20 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLO or GIS?

On trailing P/E, General Mills, Inc.

(GIS) is the cheapest at 8. 6x versus Flowers Foods, Inc. at 21. 6x. On forward P/E, General Mills, Inc. is actually cheaper at 10. 2x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLO or GIS?

Over the past 5 years, General Mills, Inc.

(GIS) delivered a total return of -27. 0%, compared to -46. 5% for Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: GIS returned -9. 4% versus FLO's -13. 0%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLO or GIS?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), General Mills, Inc.

(GIS) is the lower-risk stock at -0. 04β versus Flowers Foods, Inc. 's 0. 32β — meaning FLO is approximately -1010% more volatile than GIS relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, General Mills, Inc. (GIS) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 166% versus 179% for Flowers Foods, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLO or GIS?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flowers Foods, Inc.

(FLO) is pulling ahead at 3. 0% versus -1. 9% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: General Mills, Inc. grew EPS -4. 9% year-over-year, compared to -65. 8% for Flowers Foods, Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLO leads at 3. 0% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLO or GIS?

General Mills, Inc.

(GIS) is the more profitable company, earning 11. 8% net margin versus 1. 6% for Flowers Foods, Inc. — meaning it keeps 11. 8% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: GIS leads at 17. 0% versus 6. 6% for FLO. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLO leads at 45. 7%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLO or GIS more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, General Mills, Inc.

(GIS) trades at 10. 2x forward P/E versus 10. 4x for Flowers Foods, Inc. — 0. 1x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for GIS: 32. 8% to $46. 58.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLO or GIS?

All stocks in this comparison pay dividends.

Flowers Foods, Inc. (FLO) offers the highest yield at 11. 4%, versus 6. 8% for General Mills, Inc. (GIS).

09

Is FLO or GIS better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, General Mills, Inc.

(GIS) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β -0. 04), 6. 8% yield). Both have compounded well over 10 years (GIS: -9. 4%, FLO: -13. 0%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLO and GIS?

Both stocks operate in the Consumer Defensive sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FLO is a small-cap income-oriented stock; GIS is a mid-cap deep-value stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.

Stocks Like

FLO

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Gross Margin > 28%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

GIS

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Consumer Defensive
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 7%
  • Dividend Yield > 2.7%
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FLO and GIS on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FLO: 11.0% · GIS: -8.4%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FLO: 21.6x · GIS: 8.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.