Compare Stocks

5 / 10
Try these comparisons:

Stock Comparison

FLOC vs NCSM vs LBRT vs NINE vs PUMP

Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.

Live fundamentals10-year financials5-year price chart
FLOC
Flowco Holdings Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$804M
5Y Perf.-11.3%
NCSM
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNASDAQ • US
Market Cap$105M
5Y Perf.+40.1%
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$5.13B
5Y Perf.+80.8%
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$427M
5Y Perf.+762.9%
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.

Oil & Gas Equipment & Services

EnergyNYSE • US
Market Cap$1.91B
5Y Perf.+76.6%

FLOC vs NCSM vs LBRT vs NINE vs PUMP — Key Financials

Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.

Company Snapshot
FLOC logoFLOC
NCSM logoNCSM
LBRT logoLBRT
NINE logoNINE
PUMP logoPUMP
IndustryOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & ServicesOil & Gas Equipment & Services
Market Cap$804M$105M$5.13B$427M$1.91B
Revenue (TTM)$777M$180M$4.05B$571M$1.18B
Net Income (TTM)$71M$19M$150M$-41M$-12M
Gross Margin24.8%36.7%10.7%11.5%8.3%
Operating Margin19.4%5.2%1.5%2.0%-1.1%
Forward P/E16.1x11.8x3480.2x1993.6x
Total Debt$219M$13M$873M$383M$249M
Cash & Equiv.$5M$37M$28M$18M$91M

FLOC vs NCSM vs LBRT vs NINE vs PUMPLong-Term Stock Performance

Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.

FLOC
NCSM
LBRT
NINE
PUMP
StockJan 25May 26Return
Flowco Holdings Inc. (FLOC)10088.7-11.3%
NCS Multistage Hold… (NCSM)100140.1+40.1%
Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT)100180.8+80.8%
Nine Energy Service… (NINE)100862.9+762.9%
ProPetro Holding Co… (PUMP)100176.6+76.6%

Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.

Quick Verdict: FLOC vs NCSM vs LBRT vs NINE vs PUMP

Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.

Bottom line: NCSM leads in 4 of 7 categories (5-stock set), making it the strongest pick for valuation and capital efficiency and profitability and margin quality. Flowco Holdings Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for growth and revenue expansion and dividend income and shareholder returns. NINE also leads in specific categories worth noting. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLOC
Flowco Holdings Inc.
The Income Pick

FLOC is the #2 pick in this set and the best alternative if income & stability and defensive is your priority.

  • Dividend streak 0 yrs, beta 1.18, yield 1.6%
  • Beta 1.18, yield 1.6%, current ratio 3.34x
  • 41.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
  • 1.6% yield, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Best for: income & stability and defensive
NCSM
NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
The Growth Play

NCSM carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night.

  • Rev growth 13.6%, EPS growth 239.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 5.9%
  • Lower volatility, beta 0.28, Low D/E 9.0%, current ratio 4.27x
  • Lower P/E (11.8x vs 1993.6x)
  • 10.8% margin vs NINE's -7.2%
Best for: growth exposure and sleep-well-at-night
LBRT
Liberty Energy Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder

LBRT is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.

  • 94.1% 10Y total return vs NINE's -62.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
NINE
Nine Energy Service, Inc.
The Momentum Pick

NINE ranks third and is worth considering specifically for momentum.

  • +15.1% vs FLOC's +19.4%
Best for: momentum
PUMP
ProPetro Holding Corp.
The Energy Pick

Among these 5 stocks, PUMP doesn't own a clear edge in any measured category.

Best for: energy exposure
See the full category breakdown
CategoryWinnerWhy
GrowthFLOC logoFLOC41.9% revenue growth vs NINE's -100.0%
ValueNCSM logoNCSMLower P/E (11.8x vs 1993.6x)
Quality / MarginsNCSM logoNCSM10.8% margin vs NINE's -7.2%
Stability / SafetyNCSM logoNCSMBeta 0.28 vs NINE's 3.21
DividendsFLOC logoFLOC1.6% yield, vs LBRT's 1.0%, (3 stocks pay no dividend)
Momentum (1Y)NINE logoNINE+15.1% vs FLOC's +19.4%
Efficiency (ROA)NCSM logoNCSM11.4% ROA vs NINE's -11.5%, ROIC 7.9% vs 0.7%

FLOC vs NCSM vs LBRT vs NINE vs PUMP — Revenue Breakdown by Segment

How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units

FLOCFlowco Holdings Inc.
FY 2025
Downhole Components
33.9%$258M
Surface Equipment
31.5%$239M
Vapor Recovery
30.1%$229M
Natural Gas, Production
4.4%$34M
NCSMNCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.
FY 2025
Product
69.6%$128M
Service
30.4%$56M
LBRTLiberty Energy Inc.
FY 2025
Service, Other
100.0%$600,000
NINENine Energy Service, Inc.
FY 2025
Service Revenue
38.4%$431M
Cement
18.8%$211M
Tool Revenue
11.6%$131M
Tools
11.6%$131M
Wireline
10.3%$116M
Coiled Tubing
9.3%$104M
PUMPProPetro Holding Corp.
FY 2025
Power Generation
100.0%$2M

FLOC vs NCSM vs LBRT vs NINE vs PUMP — Financial Metrics

Side-by-side numbers across 5 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.

BEST OVERALLNCSMLAGGINGPUMP

Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)

FLOC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

LBRT is the larger business by revenue, generating $4.0B annually — 22.5x NCSM's $180M. NCSM is the more profitable business, keeping 10.8% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to NINE's -7.2%. On growth, FLOC holds the edge at +8.9% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.

MetricFLOC logoFLOCFlowco Holdings I…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …
RevenueTrailing 12 months$777M$180M$4.0B$571M$1.2B
EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax$301M$15M$549M$61M$154M
Net IncomeAfter-tax profit$71M$19M$150M-$41M-$12M
Free Cash FlowCash after capex$205M$24M-$193M-$7M-$11M
Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue+24.8%+36.7%+10.7%+11.5%+8.3%
Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue+19.4%+5.2%+1.5%+2.0%-1.1%
Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue+9.1%+10.8%+3.7%-7.2%-1.1%
FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue+26.3%+13.2%-4.8%-1.2%-0.9%
Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year+8.9%-8.7%+4.5%-4.4%-24.7%
EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year-4.2%-109.3%+16.7%-34.6%-134.2%
FLOC leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Valuation Metrics

NCSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

At 4.6x trailing earnings, NCSM trades at a 100% valuation discount to PUMP's 1993.6x P/E. On an enterprise value basis, FLOC's 3.5x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than NINE's 337.0x.

MetricFLOC logoFLOCFlowco Holdings I…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …
Market CapShares × price$804M$105M$5.1B$427M$1.9B
Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash$1.0B$81M$6.0B$791M$2.1B
Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS53.39x4.60x35.58x-7.88x1993.59x
Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est.16.11x11.82x3480.22x
PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate
EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple3.47x4.57x10.28x337.01x10.67x
Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue1.06x0.57x1.28x1.50x
Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share1.64x0.76x2.53x1.98x
Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF4.81x4.98x363.85x44.88x
NCSM leads this category, winning 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Profitability & Efficiency

NCSM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

NCSM delivers a 14.4% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $14 in annual profit, vs $-1 for PUMP. NCSM carries lower financial leverage with a 0.09x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to LBRT's 0.42x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), FLOC scores 7/9 vs NINE's 1/9, reflecting strong financial health.

MetricFLOC logoFLOCFlowco Holdings I…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …
ROE (TTM)Return on equity+5.3%+14.4%+7.4%-1.4%
ROA (TTM)Return on assets+4.1%+11.4%+4.0%-11.5%-1.0%
ROICReturn on invested capital+7.2%+7.9%+2.3%+0.7%+1.4%
ROCEReturn on capital employed+9.7%+8.4%+3.0%+0.9%+1.8%
Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–976415
Debt / EquityFinancial leverage0.16x0.09x0.42x0.30x
Net DebtTotal debt minus cash$215M-$24M$846M$364M$158M
Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets$5M$37M$28M$18M$91M
Total DebtShort + long-term debt$219M$13M$873M$383M$249M
Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense12.43x28.21x5.24x0.24x-0.86x
NCSM leads this category, winning 7 of 9 comparable metrics.

Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)

Evenly matched — LBRT and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

A $10,000 investment in NINE five years ago would be worth $48,522 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $8,377 for FLOC. Over the past 12 months, NINE leads with a +1505.8% total return vs FLOC's +19.4%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors LBRT at 38.6% vs FLOC's -5.7% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.

MetricFLOC logoFLOCFlowco Holdings I…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …
YTD ReturnYear-to-date+29.5%+0.5%+68.2%+2682.5%+58.4%
1-Year ReturnPast 12 months+19.4%+28.1%+186.8%+1505.8%+201.4%
3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.2%+104.9%+166.1%+150.0%+132.8%
5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.2%+51.4%+132.4%+385.2%+41.6%
10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends-16.2%-90.0%+94.1%-62.3%+7.2%
CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return-5.7%+27.0%+38.6%+35.7%+32.5%
Evenly matched — LBRT and NINE each lead in 3 of 6 comparable metrics.

Risk & Volatility

Evenly matched — NCSM and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

NCSM is the less volatile stock with a 0.28 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than NINE's 3.21 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. NINE currently trades 96.3% from its 52-week high vs NCSM's 45.6% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.

MetricFLOC logoFLOCFlowco Holdings I…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …
Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 5001.10x0.16x1.20x3.04x1.02x
52-Week HighHighest price in past year$25.76$87.36$34.41$10.23$18.50
52-Week LowLowest price in past year$14.03$28.64$9.90$0.00$4.51
% of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak+95.3%+45.6%+92.0%+96.3%+84.1%
RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–10055.327.858.782.951.9
Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded721K38K4.2M125K3.5M
Evenly matched — NCSM and NINE each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst Outlook

Evenly matched — FLOC and LBRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.

Analyst consensus: FLOC as "Buy", LBRT as "Buy", NINE as "Hold", PUMP as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 82.7% upside for NINE (target: $18) vs -5.1% for PUMP (target: $15). For income investors, FLOC offers the higher dividend yield at 1.58% vs LBRT's 1.04%.

MetricFLOC logoFLOCFlowco Holdings I…NCSM logoNCSMNCS Multistage Ho…LBRT logoLBRTLiberty Energy In…NINE logoNINENine Energy Servi…PUMP logoPUMPProPetro Holding …
Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sellBuyBuyHoldBuy
Price TargetConsensus 12-month target$29.50$34.00$18.00$14.75
# AnalystsCovering analysts419930
Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price+1.6%+1.0%
Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises041
Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS$0.39$0.33
Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap+1.9%+0.3%+0.5%0.0%0.0%
Evenly matched — FLOC and LBRT each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Key Takeaway

NCSM leads in 2 of 6 categories (Valuation Metrics, Profitability & Efficiency). FLOC leads in 1 (Income & Cash Flow). 3 tied.

Best OverallNCS Multistage Holdings, In… (NCSM)Leads 2 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...

FLOC vs NCSM vs LBRT vs NINE vs PUMP: Key Questions Answered

10 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily

01

Is FLOC or NCSM or LBRT or NINE or PUMP a better buy right now?

For growth investors, Flowco Holdings Inc.

(FLOC) is the stronger pick with 41. 9% revenue growth year-over-year, versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) offers the better valuation at 4. 6x trailing P/E (11. 8x forward), making it the more compelling value choice. Analysts rate Flowco Holdings Inc. (FLOC) a "Buy" — based on 4 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.

02

Which has the better valuation — FLOC or NCSM or LBRT or NINE or PUMP?

On trailing P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the cheapest at 4. 6x versus ProPetro Holding Corp. at 1993. 6x. On forward P/E, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. is actually cheaper at 11. 8x.

03

Which is the better long-term investment — FLOC or NCSM or LBRT or NINE or PUMP?

Over the past 5 years, Nine Energy Service, Inc.

(NINE) delivered a total return of +385. 2%, compared to -16. 2% for Flowco Holdings Inc. (FLOC). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: LBRT returned +102. 6% versus NCSM's -89. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.

04

Which is safer — FLOC or NCSM or LBRT or NINE or PUMP?

By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the lower-risk stock at 0. 16β versus Nine Energy Service, Inc. 's 3. 04β — meaning NINE is approximately 1782% more volatile than NCSM relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. (NCSM) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 9% versus 42% for Liberty Energy Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.

05

Which is growing faster — FLOC or NCSM or LBRT or NINE or PUMP?

By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flowco Holdings Inc.

(FLOC) is pulling ahead at 41. 9% versus -100. 0% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc. grew EPS 239. 2% year-over-year, compared to -95. 6% for Flowco Holdings Inc.. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLOC leads at 72. 3% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.

06

Which has better profit margins — FLOC or NCSM or LBRT or NINE or PUMP?

NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the more profitable company, earning 12. 9% net margin versus -7. 2% for Nine Energy Service, Inc. — meaning it keeps 12. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLOC leads at 19. 6% versus 1. 5% for PUMP. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — NCSM leads at 38. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.

07

Is FLOC or NCSM or LBRT or NINE or PUMP more undervalued right now?

On forward earnings alone, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) trades at 11. 8x forward P/E versus 3480. 2x for Liberty Energy Inc. — 3468. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for NINE: 82. 7% to $18. 00.

08

Which pays a better dividend — FLOC or NCSM or LBRT or NINE or PUMP?

In this comparison, FLOC (1.

6% yield), LBRT (1. 0% yield) pay a dividend. NCSM, NINE, PUMP do not pay a meaningful dividend and should not be held primarily for income.

09

Is FLOC or NCSM or LBRT or NINE or PUMP better for a retirement portfolio?

For long-horizon retirement investors, NCS Multistage Holdings, Inc.

(NCSM) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 0. 16)). Nine Energy Service, Inc. (NINE) carries a higher beta of 3. 04 — meaning larger drawdowns in market downturns, which matters significantly when you cannot wait years for a recovery. Both have compounded well over 10 years (NCSM: -89. 9%, NINE: -61. 6%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.

10

What are the main differences between FLOC and NCSM and LBRT and NINE and PUMP?

Both stocks operate in the Energy sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.

In terms of investment character: FLOC is a small-cap high-growth stock; NCSM is a small-cap deep-value stock; LBRT is a small-cap quality compounder stock; NINE is a small-cap quality compounder stock; PUMP is a small-cap quality compounder stock. FLOC, LBRT pay a dividend while NCSM, NINE, PUMP do not, making them suitable for different income and tax situations. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.

Find Stocks Like These

Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform all of them.

Stocks Like

FLOC

Income & Dividend Stock

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Revenue Growth > 5%
  • Net Margin > 5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NCSM

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Net Margin > 6%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

LBRT

Stable Dividend Mega-Cap

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
  • Dividend Yield > 0.5%
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

NINE

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Stocks Like

PUMP

Quality Business

  • Sector: Energy
  • Market Cap > $100B
Run This Screen
Custom Screen

Beat Both

Find stocks that outperform FLOC and NCSM and LBRT and NINE and PUMP on the metrics below

Revenue Growth>
%
(FLOC: 8.9% · NCSM: -8.7%)
Net Margin>
%
(FLOC: 9.1% · NCSM: 10.8%)
P/E Ratio<
x
(FLOC: 53.4x · NCSM: 4.6x)

You Might Also Compare

Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.