FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$17.64B
5Y Perf.-21.6%
Compare Stocks
2 / 10Try these comparisons:
Stock Comparison
FLUT vs PENN
Revenue, margins, valuation, and 5-year total return — side by side.
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
Gambling, Resorts & Casinos
Market Cap$2.24B
5Y Perf.-48.9%
FLUT vs PENN — Key Financials
Market cap, revenue, margins, and valuation side-by-side.
| Company Snapshot | FLUT | PENN |
|---|---|---|
| Industry | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos | Gambling, Resorts & Casinos |
| Market Cap | $17.64B | $2.24B |
| Revenue (TTM) | $17.02B | $6.96B |
| Net Income (TTM) | $-455M | $-843M |
| Gross Margin | 44.2% | 30.6% |
| Operating Margin | 4.4% | -7.9% |
| Forward P/E | 16.5x | 23.0x |
| Total Debt | $13.35B | $8.38B |
| Cash & Equiv. | $3.83B | $687M |
FLUT vs PENN — Long-Term Stock Performance
Price return indexed to 100 at period start. Dividends excluded.
FLUT
PENN
| Stock | May 20 | May 26 | Return |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flutter Entertainme… (FLUT) | 100 | 78.4 | -21.6% |
| PENN Entertainment,… (PENN) | 100 | 51.1 | -48.9% |
Price return only. Dividends and distributions are not included.
Quick Verdict: FLUT vs PENN
Each card shows where this stock fits in a portfolio — not just who wins on paper.
Bottom line: FLUT leads in 5 of 7 categories, making it the strongest pick for growth and revenue expansion and valuation and capital efficiency. PENN Entertainment, Inc. is the stronger pick specifically for recent price momentum and sentiment. As sector peers, any of these can serve as alternatives in the same allocation.
FLUT
Flutter Entertainment plc
The Income Pick
FLUT carries the broadest edge in this set and is the clearest fit for income & stability and growth exposure.
- Dividend streak 1 yrs, beta 1.23
- Rev growth 16.6%, EPS growth -8.2%, 3Y rev CAGR 20.1%
- Lower volatility, beta 1.23, current ratio 0.95x
Best for: income & stability and growth exposure
PENN
PENN Entertainment, Inc.
The Long-Run Compounder
PENN is the clearest fit if your priority is long-term compounding.
- 11.9% 10Y total return vs FLUT's -22.9%
- +6.7% vs FLUT's -58.3%
Best for: long-term compounding
See the full category breakdown
| Category | Winner | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Growth | FLUT | 16.6% revenue growth vs PENN's 5.8% |
| Value | FLUT | Lower P/E (16.5x vs 23.0x) |
| Quality / Margins | FLUT | -2.7% margin vs PENN's -12.1% |
| Stability / Safety | FLUT | Beta 1.23 vs PENN's 1.34, lower leverage |
| Dividends | Tie | Neither stock pays a meaningful dividend |
| Momentum (1Y) | PENN | +6.7% vs FLUT's -58.3% |
| Efficiency (ROA) | FLUT | -1.6% ROA vs PENN's -5.7%, ROIC 4.5% vs 1.8% |
FLUT vs PENN — Revenue Breakdown by Segment
How each company's revenue is distributed across its business units
FY 2025
FY 2025
FLUT vs PENN — Financial Metrics
Side-by-side numbers across 2 stocks — who leads on profitability, valuation, growth, and risk.
BEST OVERALLFLUTLAGGINGPENN
PENNPENN Entertainment, I…
1leads
FLUTFlutter Entertainment…
3leads
6 Total Categories
CATEGORYLEADERvs PENNMETRICS WON
Income & Cash FlowRevenue, margins, and cash flow strength
FLUT5/6
Valuation MetricsMultiples, price ratios, and targets
FLUT3/5
Profitability & EfficiencyROE, ROIC, leverage, and quality scores
FLUT6/9
Total Returns1Y, 3Y, 5Y total returns with dividends
PENN5/6
Risk & VolatilityBeta, volatility, and downside exposure
Tied
—
Analyst OutlookRatings, price targets, and dividends
—
—
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Income & Cash Flow (Last 12 Months)
FLUT is the larger business by revenue, generating $17.0B annually — 2.4x PENN's $7.0B. FLUT is the more profitable business, keeping -2.7% of every revenue dollar as net income compared to PENN's -12.1%. On growth, FLUT holds the edge at +17.4% YoY revenue growth, suggesting stronger near-term business momentum.
| Metric | FLUTFlutter Entertain… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| RevenueTrailing 12 months | $17.0B | $7.0B |
| EBITDAEarnings before interest/tax | $2.0B | -$105M |
| Net IncomeAfter-tax profit | -$455M | -$843M |
| Free Cash FlowCash after capex | $880M | -$169M |
| Gross MarginGross profit ÷ Revenue | +44.2% | +30.6% |
| Operating MarginEBIT ÷ Revenue | +4.4% | -7.9% |
| Net MarginNet income ÷ Revenue | -2.7% | -12.1% |
| FCF MarginFCF ÷ Revenue | +5.2% | -2.4% |
| Rev. Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | +17.4% | +8.2% |
| EPS Growth (YoY)Latest quarter vs prior year | -22.3% | +37.5% |
FLUT leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
FLUT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Valuation Metrics
On an enterprise value basis, FLUT's 10.7x EV/EBITDA is more attractive than PENN's 13.8x.
| Metric | FLUTFlutter Entertain… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| Market CapShares × price | $17.6B | $2.2B |
| Enterprise ValueMkt cap + debt − cash | $27.2B | $9.9B |
| Trailing P/EPrice ÷ TTM EPS | -58.47x | -2.88x |
| Forward P/EPrice ÷ next-FY EPS est. | 16.51x | 22.95x |
| PEG RatioP/E ÷ EPS growth rate | — | — |
| EV / EBITDAEnterprise value multiple | 10.69x | 13.81x |
| Price / SalesMarket cap ÷ Revenue | 1.08x | 0.32x |
| Price / BookPrice ÷ Book value/share | 1.87x | 1.33x |
| Price / FCFMarket cap ÷ FCF | 16.35x | — |
FLUT leads this category, winning 3 of 5 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLUT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Profitability & Efficiency
FLUT delivers a -4.3% return on equity — every $100 of shareholder capital generates $-4 in annual profit, vs $-35 for PENN. FLUT carries lower financial leverage with a 1.38x debt-to-equity ratio, signaling a more conservative balance sheet compared to PENN's 4.58x. On the Piotroski fundamental quality scale (0–9), PENN scores 5/9 vs FLUT's 4/9, reflecting solid financial health.
| Metric | FLUTFlutter Entertain… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| ROE (TTM)Return on equity | -4.3% | -34.7% |
| ROA (TTM)Return on assets | -1.6% | -5.7% |
| ROICReturn on invested capital | +4.5% | +1.8% |
| ROCEReturn on capital employed | +4.6% | +2.0% |
| Piotroski ScoreFundamental quality 0–9 | 4 | 5 |
| Debt / EquityFinancial leverage | 1.38x | 4.58x |
| Net DebtTotal debt minus cash | $9.5B | $7.7B |
| Cash & Equiv.Liquid assets | $3.8B | $687M |
| Total DebtShort + long-term debt | $13.3B | $8.4B |
| Interest CoverageEBIT ÷ Interest expense | 0.04x | -1.02x |
FLUT leads this category, winning 6 of 9 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
PENN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Total Returns (Dividends Reinvested)
A $10,000 investment in FLUT five years ago would be worth $4,935 today (with dividends reinvested), compared to $1,936 for PENN. Over the past 12 months, PENN leads with a +6.7% total return vs FLUT's -58.3%. The 3-year compound annual growth rate (CAGR) favors PENN at -13.5% vs FLUT's -20.1% — a key indicator of consistent wealth creation.
| Metric | FLUTFlutter Entertain… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| YTD ReturnYear-to-date | -53.7% | +12.9% |
| 1-Year ReturnPast 12 months | -58.3% | +6.7% |
| 3-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -49.0% | -35.3% |
| 5-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -50.7% | -80.6% |
| 10-Year ReturnCumulative with dividends | -22.9% | +11.9% |
| CAGR (3Y)Annualised 3-year return | -20.1% | -13.5% |
PENN leads this category, winning 5 of 6 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
Evenly matched — FLUT and PENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Risk & Volatility
FLUT is the less volatile stock with a 1.23 beta — it tends to amplify market swings less than PENN's 1.34 beta. A beta below 1.0 means the stock typically moves less than the S&P 500. PENN currently trades 81.4% from its 52-week high vs FLUT's 32.2% drawdown — a narrower gap to the peak suggests stronger recent price momentum.
| Metric | FLUTFlutter Entertain… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| Beta (5Y)Sensitivity to S&P 500 | 1.23x | 1.34x |
| 52-Week HighHighest price in past year | $313.69 | $20.61 |
| 52-Week LowLowest price in past year | $97.94 | $11.65 |
| % of 52W HighCurrent price vs 52-week peak | +32.2% | +81.4% |
| RSI (14)Momentum oscillator 0–100 | 35.0 | 55.1 |
| Avg Volume (50D)Average daily shares traded | 3.4M | 4.4M |
Evenly matched — FLUT and PENN each lead in 1 of 2 comparable metrics.
Analyst Outlook
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Analyst Outlook
Wall Street rates FLUT as "Buy" and PENN as "Buy". Consensus price targets imply 125.2% upside for FLUT (target: $228) vs 18.5% for PENN (target: $20).
| Metric | FLUTFlutter Entertain… | PENNPENN Entertainmen… |
|---|---|---|
| Analyst RatingConsensus buy/hold/sell | Buy | Buy |
| Price TargetConsensus 12-month target | $227.86 | $19.88 |
| # AnalystsCovering analysts | 24 | 47 |
| Dividend YieldAnnual dividend ÷ price | — | — |
| Dividend StreakConsecutive years of raises | 1 | — |
| Dividend / ShareAnnual DPS | — | — |
| Buyback YieldShare repurchases ÷ mkt cap | +6.4% | +15.8% |
Insufficient data to determine a leader in this category.
Key Takeaway
FLUT leads in 3 of 6 categories (Income & Cash Flow, Valuation Metrics). PENN leads in 1 (Total Returns). 1 tied.
Best OverallFlutter Entertainment plc (FLUT)Leads 3 of 6 categories
Loading custom metrics...
FLUT vs PENN: Frequently Asked Questions
9 questions · data-driven answers · updated daily
01Is FLUT or PENN a better buy right now?
For growth investors, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the stronger pick with 16.
6% revenue growth year-over-year, versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Analysts rate Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) a "Buy" — based on 24 analyst ratings — the highest consensus in this comparison. The "better buy" depends entirely on your goals: growth investors should weight revenue trajectory, value investors should weight P/E and PEG, and income investors should weight dividend yield and streak.
02Which is the better long-term investment — FLUT or PENN?
Over the past 5 years, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) delivered a total return of -50.
7%, compared to -80. 6% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). Over 10 years, the gap is even starker: PENN returned +11. 9% versus FLUT's -22. 9%. Past returns do not guarantee future results, and the stock with the higher historical return may already have its best growth priced in.
03Which is safer — FLUT or PENN?
By beta (market sensitivity over 5 years), Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the lower-risk stock at 1.
23β versus PENN Entertainment, Inc. 's 1. 34β — meaning PENN is approximately 9% more volatile than FLUT relative to the S&P 500. On balance sheet safety, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) carries a lower debt/equity ratio of 138% versus 5% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — giving it more financial flexibility in a downturn.
04Which is growing faster — FLUT or PENN?
By revenue growth (latest reported year), Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is pulling ahead at 16.
6% versus 5. 8% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. (PENN). On earnings-per-share growth, the picture is similar: PENN Entertainment, Inc. grew EPS -184. 4% year-over-year, compared to -820. 8% for Flutter Entertainment plc. Over a 3-year CAGR, FLUT leads at 20. 1% annualised revenue growth. Higher growth typically commands a higher valuation multiple — check whether the premium P/E or P/S is justified by the growth rate using the PEG ratio.
05Which has better profit margins — FLUT or PENN?
Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the more profitable company, earning -1.
9% net margin versus -12. 1% for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — meaning it keeps -1. 9% of every revenue dollar as bottom-line profit. Operating margin tells a similar story: FLUT leads at 6. 3% versus 3. 9% for PENN. At the gross margin level — before operating expenses — FLUT leads at 45. 2%, reflecting greater pricing power or product mix advantage. Stronger margins indicate durable pricing power, lower cost of revenue, or higher mix of software/services. They are one of the clearest signs of business quality.
06Is FLUT or PENN more undervalued right now?
On forward earnings alone, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) trades at 16.
5x forward P/E versus 23. 0x for PENN Entertainment, Inc. — 6. 4x cheaper on a one-year earnings basis. Analyst consensus price targets imply the most upside for FLUT: 125. 2% to $227. 86.
07Which pays a better dividend — FLUT or PENN?
None of the stocks in this comparison currently pay a material dividend.
All are effectively zero-yield and should be held for capital appreciation rather than income.
08Is FLUT or PENN better for a retirement portfolio?
For long-horizon retirement investors, Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) is the stronger choice — it scores higher on the combination of lower volatility, dividend reliability, and long-term compounding (low volatility (β 1.
23)). Both have compounded well over 10 years (FLUT: -22. 9%, PENN: +11. 9%), confirming both are viable long-term holds — but the lower-volatility option typically results in less emotional selling during corrections. Retirement portfolios generally favour predictability over maximum returns. Consult a financial advisor before making allocation decisions.
09What are the main differences between FLUT and PENN?
Both stocks operate in the Consumer Cyclical sector, making this a peer-level intra-sector comparison — the same macro tailwinds and headwinds will affect both.
In terms of investment character: FLUT is a mid-cap high-growth stock; PENN is a small-cap quality compounder stock. These fundamental differences mean investors should not choose between them on a single metric — the "better stock" depends entirely on which of these characteristics aligns with your investment strategy.
Find Stocks Like These
Explore pre-built screens for each stock's profile, or build a custom screen to find stocks that outperform both.
Revenue Growth>
%
(FLUT: 17.4% · PENN: 8.2%)You Might Also Compare
Based on how these companies actually compete and overlap — not just which sector they're filed under.